提交 defbd3b4 编写于 作者: D David Brownell 提交者: Linus Torvalds

atmel_spi: don't always deselect chip between messages

Update chipselect handling for atmel_spi:

  * Teach it how to leave chipselect active between messages; this
    helps various drivers work better.

  * Cope with at91rm0200 errata:  nCS0 can't be managed with GPIOs.
    The MR.PCS value is now updated whenever a chipselect changes.
    (This requires SPI pinmux init for that controller to change,
    and also testing on rm9200; doesn't break at91sam9 or avr32.)

  * Fix minor glitches:  spi_setup() must leave chipselects inactive,
    as must removal of the spi_device.

Also tweak diagnostic messaging to be a bit more useful.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: NHaavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 8da0859a
......@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct atmel_spi {
struct clk *clk;
struct platform_device *pdev;
unsigned new_1:1;
struct spi_device *stay;
u8 stopping;
struct list_head queue;
......@@ -62,29 +63,62 @@ struct atmel_spi {
/*
* Earlier SPI controllers (e.g. on at91rm9200) have a design bug whereby
* they assume that spi slave device state will not change on deselect, so
* that automagic deselection is OK. Not so! Workaround uses nCSx pins
* as GPIOs; or newer controllers have CSAAT and friends.
* that automagic deselection is OK. ("NPCSx rises if no data is to be
* transmitted") Not so! Workaround uses nCSx pins as GPIOs; or newer
* controllers have CSAAT and friends.
*
* Since the CSAAT functionality is a bit weird on newer controllers
* as well, we use GPIO to control nCSx pins on all controllers.
* Since the CSAAT functionality is a bit weird on newer controllers as
* well, we use GPIO to control nCSx pins on all controllers, updating
* MR.PCS to avoid confusing the controller. Using GPIOs also lets us
* support active-high chipselects despite the controller's belief that
* only active-low devices/systems exists.
*
* However, at91rm9200 has a second erratum whereby nCS0 doesn't work
* right when driven with GPIO. ("Mode Fault does not allow more than one
* Master on Chip Select 0.") No workaround exists for that ... so for
* nCS0 on that chip, we (a) don't use the GPIO, (b) can't support CS_HIGH,
* and (c) will trigger that first erratum in some cases.
*/
static inline void cs_activate(struct spi_device *spi)
static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
{
unsigned gpio = (unsigned) spi->controller_data;
unsigned active = spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH;
u32 mr;
mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr);
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "activate %u%s, mr %08x\n",
gpio, active ? " (high)" : "",
mr);
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "activate %u%s\n", gpio, active ? " (high)" : "");
gpio_set_value(gpio, active);
if (!(cpu_is_at91rm9200() && spi->chip_select == 0))
gpio_set_value(gpio, active);
spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
}
static inline void cs_deactivate(struct spi_device *spi)
static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
{
unsigned gpio = (unsigned) spi->controller_data;
unsigned active = spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH;
u32 mr;
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "DEactivate %u%s\n", gpio, active ? " (low)" : "");
gpio_set_value(gpio, !active);
/* only deactivate *this* device; sometimes transfers to
* another device may be active when this routine is called.
*/
mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
if (~SPI_BFEXT(PCS, mr) & (1 << spi->chip_select)) {
mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, 0xf, mr);
spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
}
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "DEactivate %u%s, mr %08x\n",
gpio, active ? " (low)" : "",
mr);
if (!(cpu_is_at91rm9200() && spi->chip_select == 0))
gpio_set_value(gpio, !active);
}
/*
......@@ -140,6 +174,7 @@ static void atmel_spi_next_xfer(struct spi_master *master,
/* REVISIT: when xfer->delay_usecs == 0, the PDC "next transfer"
* mechanism might help avoid the IRQ latency between transfers
* (and improve the nCS0 errata handling on at91rm9200 chips)
*
* We're also waiting for ENDRX before we start the next
* transfer because we need to handle some difficult timing
......@@ -169,17 +204,25 @@ static void atmel_spi_next_message(struct spi_master *master)
{
struct atmel_spi *as = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
struct spi_message *msg;
u32 mr;
struct spi_device *spi;
BUG_ON(as->current_transfer);
msg = list_entry(as->queue.next, struct spi_message, queue);
spi = msg->spi;
/* Select the chip */
mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << msg->spi->chip_select), mr);
spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
cs_activate(msg->spi);
dev_dbg(master->cdev.dev, "start message %p for %s\n",
msg, spi->dev.bus_id);
/* select chip if it's not still active */
if (as->stay) {
if (as->stay != spi) {
cs_deactivate(as, as->stay);
cs_activate(as, spi);
}
as->stay = NULL;
} else
cs_activate(as, spi);
atmel_spi_next_xfer(master, msg);
}
......@@ -232,9 +275,13 @@ static void atmel_spi_dma_unmap_xfer(struct spi_master *master,
static void
atmel_spi_msg_done(struct spi_master *master, struct atmel_spi *as,
struct spi_message *msg, int status)
struct spi_message *msg, int status, int stay)
{
cs_deactivate(msg->spi);
if (!stay || status < 0)
cs_deactivate(as, msg->spi);
else
as->stay = msg->spi;
list_del(&msg->queue);
msg->status = status;
......@@ -324,7 +371,7 @@ atmel_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
/* Clear any overrun happening while cleaning up */
spi_readl(as, SR);
atmel_spi_msg_done(master, as, msg, -EIO);
atmel_spi_msg_done(master, as, msg, -EIO, 0);
} else if (pending & SPI_BIT(ENDRX)) {
ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
......@@ -342,12 +389,13 @@ atmel_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (msg->transfers.prev == &xfer->transfer_list) {
/* report completed message */
atmel_spi_msg_done(master, as, msg, 0);
atmel_spi_msg_done(master, as, msg, 0,
xfer->cs_change);
} else {
if (xfer->cs_change) {
cs_deactivate(msg->spi);
cs_deactivate(as, msg->spi);
udelay(1);
cs_activate(msg->spi);
cs_activate(as, msg->spi);
}
/*
......@@ -410,6 +458,14 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
return -EINVAL;
}
/* see notes above re chipselect */
if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()
&& spi->chip_select == 0
&& (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)) {
dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "setup: can't be active-high\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* speed zero convention is used by some upper layers */
bus_hz = clk_get_rate(as->clk);
if (spi->max_speed_hz) {
......@@ -446,6 +502,14 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
return ret;
spi->controller_state = (void *)npcs_pin;
gpio_direction_output(npcs_pin, !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, flags);
if (as->stay == spi)
as->stay = NULL;
cs_deactivate(as, spi);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, flags);
}
dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
......@@ -502,6 +566,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)
}
}
#ifdef VERBOSE
list_for_each_entry(xfer, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
dev_dbg(controller,
" xfer %p: len %u tx %p/%08x rx %p/%08x\n",
......@@ -509,6 +574,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)
xfer->tx_buf, xfer->tx_dma,
xfer->rx_buf, xfer->rx_dma);
}
#endif
msg->status = -EINPROGRESS;
msg->actual_length = 0;
......@@ -524,8 +590,21 @@ static int atmel_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)
static void atmel_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
{
if (spi->controller_state)
gpio_free((unsigned int)spi->controller_data);
struct atmel_spi *as = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
unsigned gpio = (unsigned) spi->controller_data;
unsigned long flags;
if (!spi->controller_state)
return;
spin_lock_irqsave(&as->lock, flags);
if (as->stay == spi) {
as->stay = NULL;
cs_deactivate(as, spi);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&as->lock, flags);
gpio_free(gpio);
}
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册