提交 ab896722 编写于 作者: J Joerg Roedel

AMD IOMMU: use dev_name instead of self-build print_devid

Impact: use generic dev_name instead of own function
Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
上级 1ac4cbbc
......@@ -389,18 +389,6 @@ extern int amd_iommu_isolate;
*/
extern bool amd_iommu_unmap_flush;
/* takes a PCI device id and prints it out in a readable form */
static inline void print_devid(u16 devid, int nl)
{
int bus = devid >> 8;
int dev = devid >> 3 & 0x1f;
int fn = devid & 0x07;
printk("%02x:%02x.%x", bus, dev, fn);
if (nl)
printk("\n");
}
/* takes bus and device/function and returns the device id
* FIXME: should that be in generic PCI code? */
static inline u16 calc_devid(u8 bus, u8 devfn)
......
......@@ -1074,8 +1074,7 @@ static int get_device_resources(struct device *dev,
*domain = &dma_dom->domain;
attach_device(*iommu, *domain, *bdf);
printk(KERN_INFO "AMD IOMMU: Using protection domain %d for "
"device ", (*domain)->id);
print_devid(_bdf, 1);
"device %s\n", (*domain)->id, dev_name(dev));
}
if (domain_for_device(_bdf) == NULL)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册