提交 99c84dbd 编写于 作者: F FUJITA Tomonori 提交者: Linus Torvalds

iommu sg merging: call dma_set_seg_boundary in __scsi_alloc_queue()

This is a one-line patch to add the following to __scsi_alloc_queue():

dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);

This is the simplest approach but the result looks odd,
__scsi_alloc_queue() does:

blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, shost->dma_boundary);
dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));

I think that it would be better to set up segment boundary in the same
way as we did for the maximum segment size. That is, removing
shost->dma_boundary and LLDs call pci_set_dma_seg_boundary (or its
friends).

Then __scsi_alloc_queue() can set up both limits in the same way:

blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, dma_get_seg_boundary(dev));
blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));

killing dma_boundary in scsi_host_template needs a large patch for
libata (dma_boundary is used by only libata and sym53c8xx). I'll send
a patch to do that if it is acceptable. James and Jeff?
Signed-off-by: NFUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 681cc5cd
......@@ -1584,6 +1584,7 @@ struct request_queue *__scsi_alloc_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost,
blk_queue_max_sectors(q, shost->max_sectors);
blk_queue_bounce_limit(q, scsi_calculate_bounce_limit(shost));
blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, shost->dma_boundary);
dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, dma_get_max_seg_size(dev));
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册