提交 96710098 编写于 作者: M Mel Gorman 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm: revert "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures"

Jiri Slaby reported the following:

	(It's an effective revert of "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages
	reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures".) Given kswapd
	had hours of runtime in ps/top output yesterday in the morning
	and after the revert it's now 2 minutes in sum for the last 24h,
	I would say, it's gone.

The intention of the patch in question was to compensate for the loss of
lumpy reclaim.  Part of the reason lumpy reclaim worked is because it
aggressively reclaimed pages and this patch was meant to be a sane
compromise.

When compaction fails, it gets deferred and both compaction and
reclaim/compaction is deferred avoid excessive reclaim.  However, since
commit c6543459 ("mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD"), kswapd is woken up
each time and continues reclaiming which was not taken into account when
the patch was developed.

Attempts to address the problem ended up just changing the shape of the
problem instead of fixing it.  The release window gets closer and while
a THP allocation failing is not a major problem, kswapd chewing up a lot
of CPU is.

This patch reverts commit 83fde0f2 ("mm: vmscan: scale number of
pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction based on failures") and will be
revisited in the future.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NValdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 2ca3cb50
......@@ -1760,28 +1760,6 @@ static bool in_reclaim_compaction(struct scan_control *sc)
return false;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
/*
* If compaction is deferred for sc->order then scale the number of pages
* reclaimed based on the number of consecutive allocation failures
*/
static unsigned long scale_for_compaction(unsigned long pages_for_compaction,
struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec);
if (zone->compact_order_failed <= sc->order)
pages_for_compaction <<= zone->compact_defer_shift;
return pages_for_compaction;
}
#else
static unsigned long scale_for_compaction(unsigned long pages_for_compaction,
struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
return pages_for_compaction;
}
#endif
/*
* Reclaim/compaction is used for high-order allocation requests. It reclaims
* order-0 pages before compacting the zone. should_continue_reclaim() returns
......@@ -1829,9 +1807,6 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct lruvec *lruvec,
* inactive lists are large enough, continue reclaiming
*/
pages_for_compaction = (2UL << sc->order);
pages_for_compaction = scale_for_compaction(pages_for_compaction,
lruvec, sc);
inactive_lru_pages = get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
if (nr_swap_pages > 0)
inactive_lru_pages += get_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册