提交 8a449718 编写于 作者: A Alexander Duyck 提交者: David S. Miller

arch: Cleanup read_barrier_depends() and comments

This patch is meant to cleanup the handling of read_barrier_depends and
smp_read_barrier_depends.  In multiple spots in the kernel headers
read_barrier_depends is defined as "do {} while (0)", however we then go
into the SMP vs non-SMP sections and have the SMP version reference
read_barrier_depends, and the non-SMP define it as yet another empty
do/while.

With this commit I went through and cleaned out the duplicate definitions
and reduced the number of definitions down to 2 per header.  In addition I
moved the 50 line comments for the macro from the x86 and mips headers that
defined it as an empty do/while to those that were actually defining the
macro, alpha and blackfin.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 c11a9009
......@@ -7,6 +7,57 @@
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("wmb": : :"memory")
/**
* read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
* depend on.
*
* No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
* over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
* to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
* reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
* any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
* rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
* rmb().
*
* These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
* and the compiler.
*
* Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
* not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
* memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
*
* For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
* value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* b = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* p = &b; q = p;
* read_barrier_depends();
* d = *q;
* </programlisting>
*
* because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
* two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
* the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* a = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* b = 3; y = b;
* read_barrier_depends();
* x = a;
* </programlisting>
*
* does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
* the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
* as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
* in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
*/
#define read_barrier_depends() __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
......
......@@ -22,6 +22,57 @@
# define mb() do { barrier(); smp_check_barrier(); smp_mark_barrier(); } while (0)
# define rmb() do { barrier(); smp_check_barrier(); } while (0)
# define wmb() do { barrier(); smp_mark_barrier(); } while (0)
/*
* read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
* depend on.
*
* No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
* over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
* to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
* reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
* any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
* rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
* rmb().
*
* These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
* and the compiler.
*
* Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
* not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
* memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
*
* For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
* value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* b = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* p = &b; q = p;
* read_barrier_depends();
* d = *q;
* </programlisting>
*
* because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
* two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
* the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* a = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* b = 3; y = b;
* read_barrier_depends();
* x = a;
* </programlisting>
*
* does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
* the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
* as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
* in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
*/
# define read_barrier_depends() do { barrier(); smp_check_barrier(); } while (0)
#endif
......
......@@ -35,26 +35,22 @@
* it's (presumably) much slower than mf and (b) mf.a is supported for
* sequential memory pages only.
*/
#define mb() ia64_mf()
#define rmb() mb()
#define wmb() mb()
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define mb() ia64_mf()
#define rmb() mb()
#define wmb() mb()
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
# define smp_mb() mb()
# define smp_rmb() rmb()
# define smp_wmb() wmb()
# define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#else
# define smp_mb() barrier()
# define smp_rmb() barrier()
# define smp_wmb() barrier()
# define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#endif
#define smp_rmb() smp_mb()
#define smp_wmb() smp_mb()
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier()
#define smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier()
......
......@@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ static inline void wmb(void)
wr_fence();
}
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
#define fence() do { } while (0)
#define smp_mb() barrier()
......@@ -82,7 +80,10 @@ static inline void fence(void)
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#endif
#endif
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
......
......@@ -10,58 +10,6 @@
#include <asm/addrspace.h>
/*
* read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
* depend on.
*
* No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
* over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
* to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
* reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
* any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
* rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
* rmb().
*
* These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
* and the compiler.
*
* Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
* not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
* memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
*
* For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
* value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* b = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* p = &b; q = p;
* read_barrier_depends();
* d = *q;
* </programlisting>
*
* because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
* two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
* the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* a = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* b = 3; y = b;
* read_barrier_depends();
* x = a;
* </programlisting>
*
* does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
* the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
* as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
* in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
*/
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
......
......@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
#define mb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
......@@ -50,16 +49,17 @@
#define smp_mb() mb()
#define smp_rmb() __lwsync()
#define smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#else
#define __lwsync() barrier()
#define smp_mb() barrier()
#define smp_rmb() barrier()
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
/*
* This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
* started until the value of the argument x is known. For example, if
......
......@@ -24,11 +24,12 @@
#define rmb() mb()
#define wmb() mb()
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define smp_mb() mb()
#define smp_rmb() rmb()
#define smp_wmb() wmb()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
#define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
......
......@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
#define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
#define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define set_mb(__var, __value) \
do { __var = __value; membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
......@@ -51,7 +50,8 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
#define smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory")
#endif
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
do { \
......
......@@ -24,60 +24,6 @@
#define wmb() asm volatile("sfence" ::: "memory")
#endif
/**
* read_barrier_depends - Flush all pending reads that subsequents reads
* depend on.
*
* No data-dependent reads from memory-like regions are ever reordered
* over this barrier. All reads preceding this primitive are guaranteed
* to access memory (but not necessarily other CPUs' caches) before any
* reads following this primitive that depend on the data return by
* any of the preceding reads. This primitive is much lighter weight than
* rmb() on most CPUs, and is never heavier weight than is
* rmb().
*
* These ordering constraints are respected by both the local CPU
* and the compiler.
*
* Ordering is not guaranteed by anything other than these primitives,
* not even by data dependencies. See the documentation for
* memory_barrier() for examples and URLs to more information.
*
* For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
* value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* b = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* p = &b; q = p;
* read_barrier_depends();
* d = *q;
* </programlisting>
*
* because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
* two reads are separated by a read_barrier_depends(). However,
* the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
*
* <programlisting>
* CPU 0 CPU 1
*
* a = 2;
* memory_barrier();
* b = 3; y = b;
* read_barrier_depends();
* x = a;
* </programlisting>
*
* does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
* the read of "a" and the read of "b". Therefore, on some CPUs, such
* as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0. Use rmb()
* in cases like this where there are no data dependencies.
**/
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define smp_mb() mb()
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE
......@@ -86,16 +32,17 @@
# define smp_rmb() barrier()
#endif
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#define set_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0)
#else /* !SMP */
#define smp_mb() barrier()
#define smp_rmb() barrier()
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
#endif /* SMP */
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
/*
......
......@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
#define smp_mb() mb()
......@@ -42,7 +40,6 @@
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() read_barrier_depends()
#define set_mb(var, value) do { (void)xchg(&var, value); } while (0)
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
......@@ -50,11 +47,13 @@
#define smp_mb() barrier()
#define smp_rmb() barrier()
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
/*
* Stop RDTSC speculation. This is needed when you need to use RDTSC
* (or get_cycles or vread that possibly accesses the TSC) in a defined
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册