提交 83436a05 编写于 作者: D Dan Williams

dmaengine: kill some dubious WARN_ONCEs

dma_find_channel and dma_issue_pending_all are good places to warn about
improper api usage.  However, warning correctly means synchronizing with
dma_list_mutex, i.e. too much overhead for these fast-path calls.
Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
上级 169d5f66
......@@ -329,9 +329,6 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_find_channel(enum dma_transaction_type tx_type)
struct dma_chan *chan;
int cpu;
WARN_ONCE(dmaengine_ref_count == 0,
"client called %s without a reference", __func__);
cpu = get_cpu();
chan = per_cpu_ptr(channel_table[tx_type], cpu)->chan;
put_cpu();
......@@ -348,9 +345,6 @@ void dma_issue_pending_all(void)
struct dma_device *device;
struct dma_chan *chan;
WARN_ONCE(dmaengine_ref_count == 0,
"client called %s without a reference", __func__);
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(device, &dma_device_list, global_node) {
if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PRIVATE, device->cap_mask))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册