提交 7dea9665 编写于 作者: M Matthew Garrett 提交者: Linus Torvalds

hfsplus: fix bless ioctl when used with hardlinks

HFS+ doesn't really implement hard links - instead, hardlinks are indicated
by a magic file type which refers to an indirect node in a hidden
directory. The spec indicates that stat() should return the inode number
of the indirect node, but it turns out that this doesn't satisfy the
firmware when it's looking for a bootloader - it wants the catalog ID of
the hardlink file instead. Fix up this case.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 a6dc8c04
......@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static int hfsplus_ioctl_bless(struct file *file, int __user *user_flags)
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(inode->i_sb);
struct hfsplus_vh *vh = sbi->s_vhdr;
struct hfsplus_vh *bvh = sbi->s_backup_vhdr;
u32 cnid = (unsigned long)dentry->d_fsdata;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
......@@ -41,8 +42,12 @@ static int hfsplus_ioctl_bless(struct file *file, int __user *user_flags)
vh->finder_info[0] = bvh->finder_info[0] =
cpu_to_be32(parent_ino(dentry));
/* Bootloader */
vh->finder_info[1] = bvh->finder_info[1] = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_ino);
/*
* Bootloader. Just using the inode here breaks in the case of
* hard links - the firmware wants the ID of the hard link file,
* but the inode points at the indirect inode
*/
vh->finder_info[1] = bvh->finder_info[1] = cpu_to_be32(cnid);
/* Per spec, the OS X system folder - same as finder_info[0] here */
vh->finder_info[5] = bvh->finder_info[5] =
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册