提交 39825f4d 编写于 作者: D Dan Carpenter 提交者: John W. Linville

iwlwifi: silence buffer overflow warning

Smatch (and presumably other static checkers) complain that MAX_TID_COUNT is
past the end of the array.  In the resulting discussion, Zhu Yi pointed out
that this value is not used in real life and the assignment was only there to
silence a gcc warning.

If there were a bug in the surrounding code and the value were used, the
WARN_ON(!qc) would print a warning before the crash.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NZhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
上级 c91c3efc
......@@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static void iwl4965_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv,
struct ieee80211_tx_info *info;
struct iwl4965_tx_resp *tx_resp = (void *)&pkt->u.raw[0];
u32 status = le32_to_cpu(tx_resp->u.status);
int tid = MAX_TID_COUNT - 1;
int uninitialized_var(tid);
int sta_id;
int freed;
u8 *qc = NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册