提交 24e8ecff 编写于 作者: G Glauber Costa 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86: split safe_smp_processor_id

This implementation in x86_64 is clean and consistent, but we
sacrifice it for the sake of being equal to i386 (since the other
way around would be harder).
Signed-off-by: NGlauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 b23dab08
......@@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ static inline int num_booting_cpus(void)
return cpus_weight(cpu_callout_map);
}
#define safe_smp_processor_id() smp_processor_id()
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
#define stack_smp_processor_id() 0
#define safe_smp_processor_id() 0
#endif /* !CONFIG_SMP */
#define safe_smp_processor_id() smp_processor_id()
#endif
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册