提交 1ee11844 编写于 作者: O Oleg Nesterov 提交者: Linus Torvalds

ptrace_untrace: fix the SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED check

This bug is ancient too. ptrace_untrace() must not resume the task
if the group stop in progress, we should set TASK_STOPPED instead.

Unfortunately, we still have problems here:

	- if the process/thread was traced, SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED
	  does not necessary means this thread group is stopped.

	- ptrace breaks the bookkeeping of ->group_stop_count.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 95a3540d
......@@ -60,11 +60,15 @@ static void ptrace_untrace(struct task_struct *child)
{
spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock);
if (task_is_traced(child)) {
if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED) {
/*
* If the group stop is completed or in progress,
* this thread was already counted as stopped.
*/
if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED ||
child->signal->group_stop_count)
__set_task_state(child, TASK_STOPPED);
} else {
else
signal_wake_up(child, 1);
}
}
spin_unlock(&child->sighand->siglock);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册