提交 114e9fc9 编写于 作者: T Theodore Ts'o

ext4: Remove outdated comment about lock_super()

ext4_fill_super() is no longer called by read_super(), and it is no
longer called with the superblock locked.  The
unlock_super()/lock_super() is no longer present, so this comment is
entirely superfluous.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
上级 8df9675f
......@@ -2828,14 +2828,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
goto failed_mount4;
};
/*
* akpm: core read_super() calls in here with the superblock locked.
* That deadlocks, because orphan cleanup needs to lock the superblock
* in numerous places. Here we just pop the lock - it's relatively
* harmless, because we are now ready to accept write_super() requests,
* and aviro says that's the only reason for hanging onto the
* superblock lock.
*/
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state |= EXT4_ORPHAN_FS;
ext4_orphan_cleanup(sb, es);
EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state &= ~EXT4_ORPHAN_FS;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册