提交 106dc538 编写于 作者: P Pavel Shilovsky 提交者: Steve French

CIFS: Separate protocol specific lock type handling

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
上级 04a6aa8a
......@@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ struct smb_version_operations {
struct smb_version_values {
char *version_string;
__u32 large_lock_type;
__u32 exclusive_lock_type;
__u32 shared_lock_type;
__u32 unlock_lock_type;
};
struct smb_vol {
......
......@@ -675,12 +675,13 @@ cifs_find_fid_lock_conflict(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, __u64 offset,
struct cifsLockInfo **conf_lock)
{
struct cifsLockInfo *li;
struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink)->ses->server;
list_for_each_entry(li, &cfile->llist, llist) {
if (offset + length <= li->offset ||
offset >= li->offset + li->length)
continue;
else if ((type & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK) &&
else if ((type & server->vals->shared_lock_type) &&
((netfid == cfile->netfid && current->tgid == li->pid)
|| type == li->type))
continue;
......@@ -726,6 +727,7 @@ cifs_lock_test(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, __u64 offset, __u64 length,
int rc = 0;
struct cifsLockInfo *conf_lock;
struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode = CIFS_I(cfile->dentry->d_inode);
struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink)->ses->server;
bool exist;
mutex_lock(&cinode->lock_mutex);
......@@ -736,7 +738,7 @@ cifs_lock_test(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, __u64 offset, __u64 length,
flock->fl_start = conf_lock->offset;
flock->fl_end = conf_lock->offset + conf_lock->length - 1;
flock->fl_pid = conf_lock->pid;
if (conf_lock->type & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK)
if (conf_lock->type & server->vals->shared_lock_type)
flock->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
else
flock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
......@@ -1069,7 +1071,7 @@ cifs_push_locks(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile)
static void
cifs_read_flock(struct file_lock *flock, __u32 *type, int *lock, int *unlock,
bool *wait_flag)
bool *wait_flag, struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
if (flock->fl_flags & FL_POSIX)
cFYI(1, "Posix");
......@@ -1088,24 +1090,27 @@ cifs_read_flock(struct file_lock *flock, __u32 *type, int *lock, int *unlock,
(~(FL_POSIX | FL_FLOCK | FL_SLEEP | FL_ACCESS | FL_LEASE)))
cFYI(1, "Unknown lock flags 0x%x", flock->fl_flags);
*type = LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES;
*type = server->vals->large_lock_type;
if (flock->fl_type == F_WRLCK) {
cFYI(1, "F_WRLCK ");
*type |= server->vals->exclusive_lock_type;
*lock = 1;
} else if (flock->fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
cFYI(1, "F_UNLCK");
*type |= server->vals->unlock_lock_type;
*unlock = 1;
/* Check if unlock includes more than one lock range */
} else if (flock->fl_type == F_RDLCK) {
cFYI(1, "F_RDLCK");
*type |= LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
*type |= server->vals->shared_lock_type;
*lock = 1;
} else if (flock->fl_type == F_EXLCK) {
cFYI(1, "F_EXLCK");
*type |= server->vals->exclusive_lock_type;
*lock = 1;
} else if (flock->fl_type == F_SHLCK) {
cFYI(1, "F_SHLCK");
*type |= LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK;
*type |= server->vals->shared_lock_type;
*lock = 1;
} else
cFYI(1, "Unknown type of lock");
......@@ -1119,6 +1124,7 @@ cifs_getlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock, __u32 type,
__u64 length = 1 + flock->fl_end - flock->fl_start;
struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = (struct cifsFileInfo *)file->private_data;
struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
__u16 netfid = cfile->netfid;
if (posix_lck) {
......@@ -1128,7 +1134,7 @@ cifs_getlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock, __u32 type,
if (!rc)
return rc;
if (type & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK)
if (type & server->vals->shared_lock_type)
posix_lock_type = CIFS_RDLCK;
else
posix_lock_type = CIFS_WRLCK;
......@@ -1152,23 +1158,22 @@ cifs_getlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock, __u32 type,
flock->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
if (rc != 0)
cERROR(1, "Error unlocking previously locked "
"range %d during test of lock", rc);
"range %d during test of lock", rc);
return 0;
}
if (type & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK) {
if (type & server->vals->shared_lock_type) {
flock->fl_type = F_WRLCK;
return 0;
}
rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, current->tgid, length,
flock->fl_start, 0, 1,
type | LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK, 0, 0);
type | server->vals->shared_lock_type, 0, 0);
if (rc == 0) {
rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, current->tgid,
length, flock->fl_start, 1, 0,
type | LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK,
0, 0);
type | server->vals->shared_lock_type, 0, 0);
flock->fl_type = F_RDLCK;
if (rc != 0)
cERROR(1, "Error unlocking previously locked "
......@@ -1307,6 +1312,7 @@ cifs_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock, __u32 type,
__u64 length = 1 + flock->fl_end - flock->fl_start;
struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = (struct cifsFileInfo *)file->private_data;
struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
__u16 netfid = cfile->netfid;
if (posix_lck) {
......@@ -1316,7 +1322,7 @@ cifs_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock, __u32 type,
if (!rc || rc < 0)
return rc;
if (type & LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK)
if (type & server->vals->shared_lock_type)
posix_lock_type = CIFS_RDLCK;
else
posix_lock_type = CIFS_WRLCK;
......@@ -1380,11 +1386,13 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd, struct file_lock *flock)
"end: %lld", cmd, flock->fl_flags, flock->fl_type,
flock->fl_start, flock->fl_end);
cifs_read_flock(flock, &type, &lock, &unlock, &wait_flag);
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
cfile = (struct cifsFileInfo *)file->private_data;
tcon = tlink_tcon(cfile->tlink);
cifs_read_flock(flock, &type, &lock, &unlock, &wait_flag,
tcon->ses->server);
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
netfid = cfile->netfid;
cinode = CIFS_I(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
......
......@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "cifsglob.h"
#include "cifsproto.h"
#include "cifs_debug.h"
#include "cifspdu.h"
/*
* An NT cancel request header looks just like the original request except:
......@@ -65,4 +66,8 @@ struct smb_version_operations smb1_operations = {
struct smb_version_values smb1_values = {
.version_string = SMB1_VERSION_STRING,
.large_lock_type = LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES,
.exclusive_lock_type = 0,
.shared_lock_type = LOCKING_ANDX_SHARED_LOCK,
.unlock_lock_type = 0,
};
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册