mm: numa: do not clear PTE for pte_numa update

The TLB must be flushed if the PTE is updated but change_pte_range is
clearing the PTE while marking PTEs pte_numa without necessarily
flushing the TLB if it reinserts the same entry.  Without the flush,
it's conceivable that two processors have different TLBs for the same
virtual address and at the very least it would generate spurious faults.

This patch only unmaps the pages in change_pte_range for a full
protection change.

[riel@redhat.com: write pte_numa pte back to the page tables]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/mprotect.c

@@ -52,17 +52,19 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 			pte_t ptent;
 			bool updated = false;
 
-			ptent = ptep_modify_prot_start(mm, addr, pte);
 			if (!prot_numa) {
+				ptent = ptep_modify_prot_start(mm, addr, pte);
 				ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot);
 				updated = true;
 			} else {
 				struct page *page;
 
+				ptent = *pte;
 				page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, oldpte);
 				if (page) {
 					if (!pte_numa(oldpte)) {
 						ptent = pte_mknuma(ptent);
+						set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptent);
 						updated = true;
 					}
 				}
@@ -79,7 +81,10 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 
 			if (updated)
 				pages++;
-			ptep_modify_prot_commit(mm, addr, pte, ptent);
+
+			/* Only !prot_numa always clears the pte */
+			if (!prot_numa)
+				ptep_modify_prot_commit(mm, addr, pte, ptent);
 		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION) && !pte_file(oldpte)) {
 			swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(oldpte);