提交 063d006f 编写于 作者: E Eric Sandeen 提交者: Josef Bacik

btrfs: ensure we don't overrun devices_info[] in __btrfs_alloc_chunk

WARN_ON isn't enough, we need to stop the loop if for any reason
we would overrun the devices_info array.

I tried to track down the connection between the length of
the alloc_devices list and the rw_devices counter but
it wasn't immediately obvious, so be defensive about it.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
上级 1971e917
......@@ -3734,12 +3734,16 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (max_avail < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN * dev_stripes)
continue;
if (ndevs == fs_devices->rw_devices) {
WARN(1, "%s: found more than %llu devices\n",
__func__, fs_devices->rw_devices);
break;
}
devices_info[ndevs].dev_offset = dev_offset;
devices_info[ndevs].max_avail = max_avail;
devices_info[ndevs].total_avail = total_avail;
devices_info[ndevs].dev = device;
++ndevs;
WARN_ON(ndevs > fs_devices->rw_devices);
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册