1. 01 11月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      32 bit build fixed on Linux. · d36fb95a
      antirez 提交于
      It failed because of the way jemalloc was compiled (without passing the
      right flags to make, but just to configure). Now the same set of flags
      are also passed to the make command, fixing the issue.
      
      This fixes issue #744
      d36fb95a
  2. 31 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  3. 26 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  4. 24 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  5. 23 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 22 10月, 2012 4 次提交
    • S
      Merge pull request #693 from ghurrell/dict-h-typos · ecd82f59
      Salvatore Sanfilippo 提交于
      Fix (cosmetic) typos in dict.h
      ecd82f59
    • S
      redis-check-dump now understands dumps produced by Redis 2.6 · e5f794ff
      Schuster 提交于
      (Commit message from @antirez as it was missign in the original commits,
      also the patch was modified a bit to still work with 2.4 dumps and to
      avoid if expressions that are always true due to checked types range)
      
      This commit changes redis-check-dump to account for new encodings and
      for the new MSTIME expire format. It also refactors the test for valid
      type into a function.
      
      The code is still compatible with Redis 2.4 generated dumps.
      
      This fixes issue #709.
      e5f794ff
    • A
      Default memory limit for 32bit instanced moved from 3.5 GB to 3 GB. · c2661ed7
      antirez 提交于
      In some system, notably osx, the 3.5 GB limit was too far and not able
      to prevent a crash for out of memory. The 3 GB limit works better and it
      is still a lot of memory within a 4 GB theorical limit so it's not going
      to bore anyone :-)
      
      This fixes issue #711
      c2661ed7
    • A
      Differentiate SCRIPT KILL error replies. · acfe3675
      antirez 提交于
      When calling SCRIPT KILL currently you can get two errors:
      
      * No script in timeout (busy) state.
      * The script already performed a write.
      
      It is useful to be able to distinguish the two errors, but right now both
      start with "ERR" prefix, so string matching (that is fragile) must be used.
      
      This commit introduces two different prefixes.
      
      -NOTBUSY and -UNKILLABLE respectively to reply with an error when no
      script is busy at the moment, and when the script already executed a
      write operation and can not be killed.
      acfe3675
  7. 16 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      Fix MULTI / EXEC rendering in MONITOR output. · a1b1c1ea
      antirez 提交于
      Before of this commit it used to be like this:
      
      MULTI
      EXEC
      ... actual commands of the transaction ...
      
      Because after all that is the natural order of things. Transaction
      commands are queued and executed *only after* EXEC is called.
      
      However this makes debugging with MONITOR a mess, so the code was
      modified to provide a coherent output.
      
      What happens is that MULTI is rendered in the MONITOR output as far as
      possible, instead EXEC is propagated only after the transaction is
      executed, or even in the case it fails because of WATCH, so in this case
      you'll simply see:
      
      MULTI
      EXEC
      
      An empty transaction.
      a1b1c1ea
  8. 12 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 10 10月, 2012 2 次提交
    • S
      Merge pull request #707 from NanXiao/patch-1 · d10a01bb
      Salvatore Sanfilippo 提交于
      Update src/redis-benchmark.c
      d10a01bb
    • 一个手艺人's avatar
      Update src/redis-benchmark.c · 9eb3a7bc
      一个手艺人 提交于
      The code of current implementation:
      
      if (c->pending == 0) clientDone(c);
      In clientDone function, the c's memory has been freed, then the loop will continue: while(c->pending). The memory of c has been freed now, so c->pending is invalid (c is an invalid pointer now), and this will cause memory dump in some platforams(eg: Solaris).
      
      So I think the code should be modified as:
      if (c->pending == 0)
      {
      clientDone(c);
      break;
      }
      and this will not lead to while(c->pending).
      9eb3a7bc
  10. 06 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 05 10月, 2012 5 次提交
    • D
      fixed server install script to rewrite the default configuration file and not... · 34f37fb7
      dvir volk 提交于
      fixed server install script to rewrite the default configuration file and not a template, and removed the old config template
      Conflicts:
      
      	utils/redis.conf.tpl
      34f37fb7
    • A
      Hash function switched to murmurhash2. · da920e75
      antirez 提交于
      The previously used hash function, djbhash, is not secure against
      collision attacks even when the seed is randomized as there are simple
      ways to find seed-independent collisions.
      
      The new hash function appears to be safe (or much harder to exploit at
      least) in this case, and has better distribution.
      
      Better distribution does not always means that's better. For instance in
      a fast benchmark with "DEBUG POPULATE 1000000" I obtained the following
      results:
      
          1.6 seconds with djbhash
          2.0 seconds with murmurhash2
      
      This is due to the fact that djbhash will hash objects that follow the
      pattern `prefix:<id>` and where the id is numerically near, to near
      buckets. This improves the locality.
      
      However in other access patterns with keys that have no relation
      murmurhash2 has some (apparently minimal) speed advantage.
      
      On the other hand a better distribution should significantly
      improve the quality of the distribution of elements returned with
      dictGetRandomKey() that is used in SPOP, SRANDMEMBER, RANDOMKEY, and
      other commands.
      
      Everything considered, and under the suspect that this commit fixes a
      security issue in Redis, we are switching to the new hash function.
      If some serious speed regression will be found in the future we'll be able
      to step back easiliy.
      
      This commit fixes issue #663.
      da920e75
    • A
      Warn when configured maxmemory value seems odd. · c43aea7e
      antirez 提交于
      This commit warns the user with a log at "warning" level if:
      
      1) After the server startup the maxmemory limit was found to be < 1MB.
      2) After a CONFIG SET command modifying the maxmemory setting the limit
      is set to a value that is smaller than the currently used memory.
      
      The behaviour of the Redis server is unmodified, and this wil not make
      the CONFIG SET command or a wrong configuration in redis.conf less
      likely to create problems, but at least this will make aware most users
      about a possbile error they committed without resorting to external
      help.
      
      However no warning is issued if, as a result of loading the AOF or RDB
      file, we are very near the maxmemory setting, or key eviction will be
      needed in order to go under the specified maxmemory setting. The reason
      is that in servers configured as a cache with an aggressive
      maxmemory-policy most of the times restarting the server will cause this
      condition to happen if persistence is not switched off.
      
      This fixes issue #429.
      c43aea7e
    • A
      Include time.h in ae.c as we now use time(). · 2b73b350
      antirez 提交于
      2b73b350
    • J
      Force expire all timer events when system clock skew is detected. · b7b2a1cc
      Jokea 提交于
      When system time changes back, the timer will not worker properly
      hence some core functionality of redis will stop working(e.g. replication,
      bgsave, etc). See issue #633 for details.
      
      The patch saves the previous time and when a system clock skew is detected,
      it will force expire all timers.
      
      Modiifed by @antirez: the previous time was moved into the eventLoop
      structure to make sure the library is still thread safe as long as you
      use different event loops into different threads (otherwise you need
      some synchronization). More comments added about the reasoning at the
      base of the patch, that's worth reporting here:
      
      /* If the system clock is moved to the future, and then set back to the
       * right value, time events may be delayed in a random way. Often this
       * means that scheduled operations will not be performed soon enough.
       *
       * Here we try to detect system clock skews, and force all the time
       * events to be processed ASAP when this happens: the idea is that
       * processing events earlier is less dangerous than delaying them
       * indefinitely, and practice suggests it is. */
      b7b2a1cc
  12. 04 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      "Timeout receiving bulk data" error message modified. · f0b9f803
      antirez 提交于
      The new message now contains an hint about modifying the repl-timeout
      configuration directive if the problem persists.
      
      This should normally not be needed, because while the master generates
      the RDB file it makes sure to send newlines to the replication channel
      to prevent timeouts. However there are times when masters running on
      very slow systems can completely stop for seconds during the RDB saving
      process. In such a case enlarging the timeout value can fix the problem.
      
      See issue #695 for an example of this problem in an EC2 deployment.
      f0b9f803
  13. 03 10月, 2012 2 次提交
    • A
      "SORT by nosort" (skip sorting) respect sorted set ordering. · 9a914a63
      antirez 提交于
      When SORT is called with the option BY set to a string constant not
      inclduing the wildcard character "*", there is no way to sort the output
      so any ordering is valid. This allows the SORT internals to optimize its
      work and don't really sort the output at all.
      
      However it was odd that this option was not able to retain the natural
      order of a sorted set. This feature was requested by users multiple
      times as sometimes to call SORT with GET against sorted sets as a way to
      mass-fetch objects can be handy.
      
      This commit introduces two things:
      
      1) The ability of SORT to return sorted sets elements in their natural
      ordering when `BY nosort` is specified, accordingly to `DESC / ASC` options.
      2) The ability of SORT to optimize this case further if LIMIT is passed
      as well, avoiding to really fetch the whole sorted set, but directly
      obtaining the specified range.
      
      Because in this case the sorting is always deterministic, no
      post-sorting activity is performed when SORT is called from a Lua
      script.
      
      This commit fixes issue #98.
      9a914a63
    • G
      Fix (cosmetic) typos in dict.h · 4b1f6ad3
      Greg Hurrell 提交于
      4b1f6ad3
  14. 01 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 28 9月, 2012 2 次提交
    • A
      Scripting: add helper functions redis.error_reply() and redis.status_reply(). · 9c21b72b
      antirez 提交于
      A previous commit introduced Redis.NIL. This commit adds similar helper
      functions to return tables with a single field set to the specified
      string so that instead of using 'return {err="My Error"}' it is possible
      to use a more idiomatic form:
      
          return redis.error_reply("My Error")
          return redis.status_reply("OK")
      9c21b72b
    • A
      Scripting: redis.NIL to return nil bulk replies. · 6dd1693c
      antirez 提交于
      Lua arrays can't contain nil elements (see
      http://www.lua.org/pil/19.1.html for more information), so Lua scripts
      were not able to return a multi-bulk reply containing nil bulk
      elements inside.
      
      This commit introduces a special conversion: a table with just
      a "nilbulk" field set to a boolean value is converted by Redis as a nil
      bulk reply, but at the same time for Lua this type is not a "nil" so can
      be used inside Lua arrays.
      
      This type is also assigned to redis.NIL, so the following two forms
      are equivalent and will be able to return a nil bulk reply as second
      element of a three elements array:
      
          EVAL "return {1,redis.NIL,3}" 0
          EVAL "return {1,{nilbulk=true},3}" 0
      
      The result in redis-cli will be:
      
          1) (integer) 1
          2) (nil)
          3) (integer) 3
      6dd1693c
  16. 27 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 21 9月, 2012 3 次提交
    • A
      Test for SRANDMEMBER with <count>. · 0ee3f055
      antirez 提交于
      0ee3f055
    • A
      SRANDMEMBER <count> leak fixed. · 578c9459
      antirez 提交于
      For "CASE 4" (see code) we need to free the element if it's already in
      the result dictionary and adding it failed.
      578c9459
    • A
      Added the SRANDMEMBER key <count> variant. · be90c803
      antirez 提交于
      SRANDMEMBER called with just the key argument can just return a single
      random element from a Redis Set. However many users need to return
      multiple unique elements from a Set, this is not a trivial problem to
      handle in the client side, and for truly good performance a C
      implementation was required.
      
      After many requests for this feature it was finally implemented.
      
      The problem implementing this command is the strategy to follow when
      the number of elements the user asks for is near to the number of
      elements that are already inside the set. In this case asking random
      elements to the dictionary API, and trying to add it to a temporary set,
      may result into an extremely poor performance, as most add operations
      will be wasted on duplicated elements.
      
      For this reason this implementation uses a different strategy in this
      case: the Set is copied, and random elements are returned to reach the
      specified count.
      
      The code actually uses 4 different algorithms optimized for the
      different cases.
      
      If the count is negative, the command changes behavior and allows for
      duplicated elements in the returned subset.
      be90c803
  18. 17 9月, 2012 3 次提交
    • A
      Fix compilation on FreeBSD. Thanks to @koobs on twitter. · d310fbed
      antirez 提交于
      d310fbed
    • A
      .gitignore modified to be more general with less entries. · b5b2acea
      antirez 提交于
      b5b2acea
    • A
      A reimplementation of blocking operation internals. · 7eb850ef
      antirez 提交于
      Redis provides support for blocking operations such as BLPOP or BRPOP.
      This operations are identical to normal LPOP and RPOP operations as long
      as there are elements in the target list, but if the list is empty they
      block waiting for new data to arrive to the list.
      
      All the clients blocked waiting for th same list are served in a FIFO
      way, so the first that blocked is the first to be served when there is
      more data pushed by another client into the list.
      
      The previous implementation of blocking operations was conceived to
      serve clients in the context of push operations. For for instance:
      
      1) There is a client "A" blocked on list "foo".
      2) The client "B" performs `LPUSH foo somevalue`.
      3) The client "A" is served in the context of the "B" LPUSH,
      synchronously.
      
      Processing things in a synchronous way was useful as if "A" pushes a
      value that is served by "B", from the point of view of the database is a
      NOP (no operation) thing, that is, nothing is replicated, nothing is
      written in the AOF file, and so forth.
      
      However later we implemented two things:
      
      1) Variadic LPUSH that could add multiple values to a list in the
      context of a single call.
      2) BRPOPLPUSH that was a version of BRPOP that also provided a "PUSH"
      side effect when receiving data.
      
      This forced us to make the synchronous implementation more complex. If
      client "B" is waiting for data, and "A" pushes three elemnents in a
      single call, we needed to propagate an LPUSH with a missing argument
      in the AOF and replication link. We also needed to make sure to
      replicate the LPUSH side of BRPOPLPUSH, but only if in turn did not
      happened to serve another blocking client into another list ;)
      
      This were complex but with a few of mutually recursive functions
      everything worked as expected... until one day we introduced scripting
      in Redis.
      
      Scripting + synchronous blocking operations = Issue #614.
      
      Basically you can't "rewrite" a script to have just a partial effect on
      the replicas and AOF file if the script happened to serve a few blocked
      clients.
      
      The solution to all this problems, implemented by this commit, is to
      change the way we serve blocked clients. Instead of serving the blocked
      clients synchronously, in the context of the command performing the PUSH
      operation, it is now an asynchronous and iterative process:
      
      1) If a key that has clients blocked waiting for data is the subject of
      a list push operation, We simply mark keys as "ready" and put it into a
      queue.
      2) Every command pushing stuff on lists, as a variadic LPUSH, a script,
      or whatever it is, is replicated verbatim without any rewriting.
      3) Every time a Redis command, a MULTI/EXEC block, or a script,
      completed its execution, we run the list of keys ready to serve blocked
      clients (as more data arrived), and process this list serving the
      blocked clients.
      4) As a result of "3" maybe more keys are ready again for other clients
      (as a result of BRPOPLPUSH we may have push operations), so we iterate
      back to step "3" if it's needed.
      
      The new code has a much simpler semantics, and a simpler to understand
      implementation, with the disadvantage of not being able to "optmize out"
      a PUSH+BPOP as a No OP.
      
      This commit will be tested with care before the final merge, more tests
      will be added likely.
      7eb850ef
  19. 11 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      Make sure that SELECT argument is an integer or return an error. · bfc197c3
      antirez 提交于
      Unfortunately we had still the lame atoi() without any error checking in
      place, so "SELECT foo" would work as "SELECT 0". This was not an huge
      problem per se but some people expected that DB can be strings and not
      just numbers, and without errors you get the feeling that they can be
      numbers, but not the behavior.
      
      Now getLongFromObjectOrReply() is used as almost everybody else across
      the code, generating an error if the number is not an integer or
      overflows the long type.
      
      Thanks to @mipearson for reporting that on Twitter.
      bfc197c3