1. 08 5月, 2013 6 次提交
  2. 07 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  3. 03 5月, 2013 5 次提交
  4. 02 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  5. 30 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • A
      Sentinel: changes to tilt mode. · e5ef85c4
      antirez 提交于
      Tilt mode was too aggressive (not processing INFO output), this
      resulted in a few problems:
      
      1) Redirections were not followed when in tilt mode. This opened a
         window to misinform clients about the current master when a Sentinel
         was in tilt mode and a fail over happened during the time it was not
         able to update the state.
      
      2) It was possible for a Sentinel exiting tilt mode to detect a false
         fail over start, if a slave rebooted with a wrong configuration
         about at the same time. This used to happen since in tilt mode we
         lose the information that the runid changed (reboot).
      
         Now instead the Sentinel in tilt mode will still remove the instance
         from the list of slaves if it changes state AND runid at the same
         time.
      
      Both are edge conditions but the changes should overall improve the
      reliability of Sentinel.
      e5ef85c4
    • A
      ef05a78e
  6. 29 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 26 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      Sentinel: only demote old master into slave under certain conditions. · 48ede0d8
      antirez 提交于
      We used to always turn a master into a slave if the DEMOTE flag was set,
      as this was a resurrecting master instance.
      
      However the following race condition is possible for a Sentinel that
      got partitioned or internal issues (tilt mode), and was not able to
      refresh the state in the meantime:
      
      1) Sentinel X is running, master is instance "A".
      3) "A" fails, sentinels will promote slave "B" as master.
      2) Sentinel X goes down because of a network partition.
      4) "A" returns available, Sentinels will demote it as a slave.
      5) "B" fails, other Sentinels will promote slave "A" as master.
      6) At this point Sentinel X comes back.
      
      When "X" comes back he thinks that:
      
      "B" is the master.
      "A" is the slave to demote.
      
      We want to avoid that Sentinel "X" will demote "A" into a slave.
      We also want that Sentinel "X" will detect that the conditions changed
      and will reconfigure itself to monitor the right master.
      
      There are two main ways for the Sentinel to reconfigure itself after
      this event:
      
      1) If "B" is reachable and already configured as a slave by other
      sentinels, "X" will perform a redirection to "A".
      2) If there are not the conditions to demote "A", the fact that "A"
      reports to be a master will trigger a failover detection in "X", that
      will end into a reconfiguraiton to monitor "A".
      
      However if the Sentinel was not reachable, its state may not be updated,
      so in case it titled, or was partiitoned from the master instance of the
      slave to demote, the new implementation waits some time (enough to
      guarantee we can detect the new INFO, and new DOWN conditions).
      
      If after some time still there are not the right condiitons to demote
      the instance, the DEMOTE flag is cleared.
      48ede0d8
  8. 24 4月, 2013 4 次提交
    • A
      Sentinel: always redirect on master->slave transition. · 1965e22a
      antirez 提交于
      Sentinel redirected to the master if the instance changed runid or it
      was the first time we got INFO, and a role change was detected from
      master to slave.
      
      While this is a good idea in case of slave->master, since otherwise we
      could detect a failover without good reasons just after a reboot with a
      slave with a wrong configuration, in the case of master->slave
      transition is much better to always perform the redirection for the
      following reasons:
      
      1) A Sentinel may go down for some time. When it is back online there is
      no other way to understand there was a failover.
      2) Pointing clients to a slave seems to be always the wrong thing to do.
      3) There is no good rationale about handling things differently once an
      instance is rebooted (runid change) in that case.
      1965e22a
    • A
      d264122f
    • A
      AOF: sync data on disk every 32MB when rewriting. · 336d722f
      antirez 提交于
      This prevents the kernel from putting too much stuff in the output
      buffers, doing too heavy I/O all at once. So the goal of this commit is
      to split the disk pressure due to the AOF rewrite process into smaller
      spikes.
      
      Please see issue #1019 for more information.
      336d722f
    • A
      91f4213d
  9. 23 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      Test: fix RDB test checking file permissions. · c4656119
      antirez 提交于
      When the test is executed using the root account, setting the permission
      to 222 does not work as expected, as root can read files with 222
      permission.
      
      Now we skip the test if root is detected.
      
      This fixes issue #1034 and the duplicated #1040 issue.
      
      Thanks to Jan-Erik Rediger (@badboy on Github) for finding a way to reproduce the issue.
      c4656119
  10. 22 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 19 4月, 2013 3 次提交
  12. 18 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      Redis/Jemalloc Gitignore were too aggressive. · d04afd62
      antirez 提交于
      Redis gitignore was too aggressive since simply broken.
      
      Jemalloc gitignore was too agressive because it is conceived to just
      keep the files that allow to generate all the rest in development
      environments (so for instance the "configure" file is excluded).
      d04afd62
  13. 11 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • A
      redis-cli: raise error on bad command line switch. · f8ae70cf
      antirez 提交于
      Previously redis-cli never tried to raise an error when an unrecognized
      switch was encountered, as everything after the initial options is to be
      transmitted to the server.
      
      However this is too liberal, as there are no commands starting with "-".
      So the new behavior is to produce an error if there is an unrecognized
      switch starting with "-". This should not break past redis-cli usages
      but should prevent broken options to be silently discarded.
      
      As far the first token not starting with "-" is encountered, all the
      rest is considered to be part of the command, so you cna still use
      strings starting with "-" as values, like in:
      
          redis-cli --port 6380 set foo --my-value
      f8ae70cf
    • A
      redis-cli: --latency-history mode implemented. · 0280c2f2
      antirez 提交于
      0280c2f2
  14. 09 4月, 2013 5 次提交
  15. 04 4月, 2013 3 次提交