[td-225] fix a typo.

src/util/tests/trefTest.c

@@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ void *addRef(void *param) {
   SRefSpace *pSpace = (SRefSpace *)param;
   int id;
 
-  setThreadName("addRef");
-
   for (int i=0; i < pSpace->steps; ++i) {
     printf("a");
     id = random() % pSpace->refNum; 
@@ -54,8 +52,6 @@ void *removeRef(void *param) {
   SRefSpace *pSpace = (SRefSpace *)param;
   int id, code;
 
-  setThreadName("removeRef");
-
   for (int i=0; i < pSpace->steps; ++i) {
     printf("d");
     id = random() % pSpace->refNum; 
@@ -74,8 +70,6 @@ void *acquireRelease(void *param) {
   SRefSpace *pSpace = (SRefSpace *)param;
   int id;
 
-  setThreadName("acquireRelease");
-
   for (int i=0; i < pSpace->steps; ++i) {
     printf("a");
     
@@ -97,8 +91,6 @@ void myfree(void *p) {
 void *openRefSpace(void *param) {
   SRefSpace *pSpace = (SRefSpace *)param;
 
-  setThreadName("openRefSpace");
-
   printf("c");
   pSpace->rsetId = taosOpenRef(50, myfree);
 

src/vnode/src/vnodeWorker.c

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 
 typedef enum {
   VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_CLEANUP,
-  VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_DESTROUY
+  VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_DESTROY
 } EVMWorkerAction;
 
 typedef struct {
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ int32_t vnodeCleanupInMWorker(SVnodeObj *pVnode) {
 
 int32_t vnodeDestroyInMWorker(SVnodeObj *pVnode) {
   vTrace("vgId:%d, will destroy in vmworker", pVnode->vgId);
-  return vnodeWriteIntoMWorker(pVnode, VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_DESTROUY, NULL);
+  return vnodeWriteIntoMWorker(pVnode, VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_DESTROY, NULL);
 }
 
 static void vnodeFreeMWorkerMsg(SVMWorkerMsg *pMsg) {
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static void vnodeProcessMWorkerMsg(SVMWorkerMsg *pMsg) {
     case VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_CLEANUP:
       vnodeCleanUp(pMsg->pVnode);
       break;
-    case VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_DESTROUY:
+    case VNODE_WORKER_ACTION_DESTROY:
       vnodeDestroy(pMsg->pVnode);
       break;
     default: