enh: adjust the number of vnode threads so that one vnode has one write thread

source/dnode/mgmt/mgmt_vnode/src/vmWorker.c

@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ int32_t vmAllocQueue(SVnodeMgmt *pMgmt, SVnodeObj *pVnode) {
   SMultiWorkerCfg wcfg = {.max = 1, .name = "vnode-write", .fp = (FItems)vnodeProposeWriteMsg, .param = pVnode->pImpl};
   SMultiWorkerCfg scfg = {.max = 1, .name = "vnode-sync", .fp = (FItems)vmProcessSyncQueue, .param = pVnode};
   SMultiWorkerCfg sccfg = {.max = 1, .name = "vnode-sync-ctrl", .fp = (FItems)vmProcessSyncQueue, .param = pVnode};
-  SMultiWorkerCfg acfg = {.max = 1, .name = "vnode-apply", .fp = (FItems)vnodeApplyWriteMsg, .param = pVnode};
+  SMultiWorkerCfg acfg = {.max = 1, .name = "vnode-apply", .fp = (FItems)vnodeApplyWriteMsg, .param = pVnode->pImpl};
   (void)tMultiWorkerInit(&pVnode->pWriteW, &wcfg);
   (void)tMultiWorkerInit(&pVnode->pSyncW, &scfg);
   (void)tMultiWorkerInit(&pVnode->pSyncCtrlW, &sccfg);

source/dnode/vnode/src/vnd/vnodeSync.c

@@ -244,6 +244,16 @@ int32_t vnodeProcessSyncMsg(SVnode *pVnode, SRpcMsg *pMsg, SRpcMsg **pRsp) {
 }
 
 static int32_t vnodeSyncEqCtrlMsg(const SMsgCb *msgcb, SRpcMsg *pMsg) {
+  if (pMsg == NULL || pMsg->pCont == NULL) {
+    return -1;
+  }
+
+  if (msgcb == NULL || msgcb->putToQueueFp == NULL) {
+    rpcFreeCont(pMsg->pCont);
+    pMsg->pCont = NULL;
+    return -1;
+  }
+
   int32_t code = tmsgPutToQueue(msgcb, SYNC_CTRL_QUEUE, pMsg);
   if (code != 0) {
     rpcFreeCont(pMsg->pCont);
@@ -253,6 +263,16 @@ static int32_t vnodeSyncEqCtrlMsg(const SMsgCb *msgcb, SRpcMsg *pMsg) {
 }
 
 static int32_t vnodeSyncEqMsg(const SMsgCb *msgcb, SRpcMsg *pMsg) {
+  if (pMsg == NULL || pMsg->pCont == NULL) {
+    return -1;
+  }
+
+  if (msgcb == NULL || msgcb->putToQueueFp == NULL) {
+    rpcFreeCont(pMsg->pCont);
+    pMsg->pCont = NULL;
+    return -1;
+  }
+
   int32_t code = tmsgPutToQueue(msgcb, SYNC_QUEUE, pMsg);
   if (code != 0) {
     rpcFreeCont(pMsg->pCont);