save_model.md 3.7 KB
Newer Older
H
Helin Wang 已提交
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
# Design Doc: Save Model

## Overview

The model is the output of the training process. There are two
ways from which user can obtain a model:

- Save model triggered by user code: user code asks PaddlePaddle to
  save a model.
H
Helin Wang 已提交
10 11 12 13
- Convert model from the checkpoint: model being converted from
  pservers' periodic checkpoint. In this way, the user can cancel a
  job at any time, and still have a relatively fresh model (we
  checkpoint around every 5 minutes).
H
Helin Wang 已提交
14

H
Helin Wang 已提交
15
### Trainer Saving Model vs. Pservers Saving Model
H
Helin Wang 已提交
16 17 18 19 20

Both trainers and pservers have access to the model. So the model can
be saved from a trainer or pservers. We need to decide on where the
model is saved from.

H
Helin Wang 已提交
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
#### Dense Update vs. Sparse Update

There are two types of model update methods: dense update and sparse
update (when the parameter is configured to be sparse).

- Dense update

  Every trainer has it's own full copy of the model. Every model
  update will update the entire model.

- Sparse update

  The training input is sparse, and the trainer does not have the
  entire model. It will only download the sub-model necessary related
  to the input. When updating the model, only the sub-model related to
  the training input is updated.
H
Helin Wang 已提交
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44


#### Pservers Saving Model

The benefit of letting pservers save model is they have the entire
model all the time. However, since pservers are on different nodes, it
requires a merging process to merge model shards into the same
model. Thus requires the pservers to write models to a distributed
H
Helin Wang 已提交
45
filesystem, making the checkpoint shards visible to the merge program.
H
Helin Wang 已提交
46 47 48 49 50

#### Trainer Saving Model

The benefit of letting one trainer to save the model is it does not
require a distributed filesystem. And it's reusing the same save model
H
Helin Wang 已提交
51 52 53
logic when the trainer is training locally - except when doing sparse
update, the trainer needs to download the entire model during the
saving process.
H
Helin Wang 已提交
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61

#### Conclusion

Given trainer saving model does not require a distributed filesystem,
and is an intuitive extension to training locally, we decide to let
the trainer save the model.


H
Helin Wang 已提交
62
### Convert Model from Checkpoint
H
Helin Wang 已提交
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98

TODO


## Timeline

We first implement trainer save the model. Converting the latest
snapshot to a model will be a TODO for future.


## Trainer Save Model

### Trainer Election

One trainer will be elected as the one to save the model. When using
etcd, trainer ID is a randomly generated UUID, we will utilize etcd to
elect one trainer. When not using etcd, unique trainer IDs will be
given by the administrator, the trainer whose ID is "0" is elected to
save the model.

### Model Save Path

Each trainer will be given the directory to save the model. The
elected trainer will save the model to
`given-directory/trainerID`. Since the tainerID is unique, this would
prevent concurrent save to the same file when multiple trainers are
elected to save the model when split-brain problem happens.

### What Happens When Model Is Saving

It takes some time to save model, we need to define what will happen
when save model is taking place.

When saving a dense model, the trainer uses the local model. Pservers
does not need to pause model update.

H
Helin Wang 已提交
99 100 101 102
When doing sparse update. The trainer needs to download the entire
model while saving. To get the most accurate model, the model update
needs to be paused before the download starts and resumed after the
download finishes. Otherwise, the trainer gets a model that is
H
Helin Wang 已提交
103 104 105 106 107
"polluted": some part of the model is old, some part of the model is
new.

It's unclear that the "polluted" model will be inferiod due to the
stochastic nature of deep learning, and pausing the model update will
H
Helin Wang 已提交
108
add more complexity to the system. Since supporting sparse update is a
H
Helin Wang 已提交
109 110
TODO item. We defer the evaluation of pause the model update or not
during saving model to the future.