Skip to content

L
linux

Linux-御风守护者 / linux
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 1
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 09 8月, 2015 6 次提交
    • Z
      btrfs: Bypass unrelated items before accessing its contents in scrub · d7cad238
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      When we access extent_root in scrub_stripe() and
scrub_raid56_parity(), we need bypass unrelated tree item firstly
before using its contents to do other condition.

It is not a bug fix, only making code sequence in logic.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d7cad238
    • Z
      btrfs: Load only necessary csums into list in scrub · fe8cf654
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      We need not load csum of whole strip in scrub because strip is trimed
before use, it is to say, what we really need to calculate csum is
data between [extent_logical, extent_len).

This patch changed to use above segment for btrfs_lookup_csums_range()
in scrub_stripe()
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      fe8cf654
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix calculate typo caused by ambiguous meaning of logic_end · a0dd59de
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      For example, in scrub_raid56_parity(), following lines are used
to judge is all data processed:
 place1: if (key.objectid > logic_end) ...
 place2: if (logic_start >= logic_end) ...
 ...
 (place2 is typo, is should be ">", it is copied from other
  place, where logic_end's meaning is different, long story...)

We can fix above typo directly, but the root reason is ambiguous
meaning of logic_end in scrub raid56 parity.

In other place, XXX_end is pointed to data which is not included,
and we need to process segment of [XXX_start, XXX_end).

But for scrub raid56 parity, logic_end is pointed to lattest data
need to process, and introduced many "+ 1" and "- 1" in code as
below:
 length = sparity->logic_end - sparity->logic_start + 1
 logic_end - logic_start + 1
 stripe_logical + increment - 1

This patch changed logic_end's meaning to make it in normal understanding
in raid56 parity functions and data struct alone with above bugfix.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a0dd59de
    • Z
      btrfs: Free checksum list on scrub_extent() fail · 6fa96d72
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      When scrub_extent() failed, we need to free previois created
checksum list.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      6fa96d72
    • Z
      btrfs: Check cancel and pause in interval of scrub operation · f2f66a2f
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      Old code checking cancel and pause request inside scrub stripe
operation, like:
  loop() {
    if (parity) {
      scrub_parity_stripe();
      continue;
    }

    check_cancel_and_pause()

    scrub_normal_stripe();
  }

Reason is when introduce raid56 stripe scrub, new code is inserted
simplely to front of loop.

Better to:
  loop() {
    check_cancel_and_pause()

    if (parity)
      scrub_parity_stripe();
    else
      scrub_normal_stripe();
  }

This patch adjusted code place to realize above sequence.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f2f66a2f
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix scrub panic when leaf crosses stripes · a323e813
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      Scrub panic in following operation:
  mkfs.ext4 /dev/vdh
  btrfs-convert /dev/vdh
  mount /dev/vdh /mnt/tmp1
  btrfs scrub start -B /dev/vdh
  (panic)

Reason:
  1: In some case, leaf created by btrfs-convert was splited into 2
     strips.
  2: Scrub bypassed part of above wrong leaf data, but remain data
     caused panic in scrub_checksum_tree_block().

For reason 1:
  we can get following information after some simple operation.
  a. mkfs.ext4 /dev/vdh
     btrfs-convert /dev/vdh
  b. btrfs-debug-tree /dev/vdh
     we can see following item in extent tree:
     item 25 key (27054080 METADATA_ITEM 0) itemoff 15083 itemsize 33
     Its logical address is [27054080, 27070464)
     and acrossed 2 strips:
     [27000832, 27066368)
     [27066368, 27131904)
  Will be fixed in btrfs-progs(btrfs-convert, btrfsck, ...)

For reason 2:
  Scrub is trying to do a "bypass" in this case, but the result is
  "panic", because current code lacks of some condition in bypass,
  and let some wrong leaf data escaped.

This patch fixed above scrub code.

Before patch:
  # btrfs scrub start -B /dev/vdh
  (panic)

After patch:
  # btrfs scrub start -B /dev/vdh
  scrub done for 353cec8f-da31-4a94-aa35-be72d997b06e
  ...
  # dmesg
  ...
  [   59.088697] BTRFS error (device vdh): scrub: tree block 27054080 spanning stripes, ignored. logical=27000832
  [   59.089929] BTRFS error (device vdh): scrub: tree block 27054080 spanning stripes, ignored. logical=27066368
  #
Reported-by: NChris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a323e813
  3. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 10 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • Z
      btrfs: Fix lockdep warning of wr_ctx->wr_lock in scrub_free_wr_ctx() · 20b2e302
      由 Zhao Lei 提交于 
      lockdep report following warning in test:
 [25176.843958] =================================
 [25176.844519] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 [25176.845047] 4.1.0-rc3 #22 Tainted: G        W
 [25176.845591] ---------------------------------
 [25176.846153] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
 [25176.846713] fsstress/26661 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
 [25176.847246]  (&wr_ctx->wr_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa04cdc6d>] scrub_free_ctx+0x2d/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [25176.847838] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
 [25176.848396]   [<ffffffff810bf460>] __lock_acquire+0x6a0/0xe10
 [25176.848955]   [<ffffffff810bfd1e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
 [25176.849491]   [<ffffffff816489af>] mutex_lock_nested+0x7f/0x410
 [25176.850029]   [<ffffffffa04d04ff>] scrub_stripe+0x4df/0x1080 [btrfs]
 [25176.850575]   [<ffffffffa04d11b1>] scrub_chunk.isra.19+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
 [25176.851110]   [<ffffffffa04d144c>] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x27c/0x510 [btrfs]
 [25176.851660]   [<ffffffffa04d3b87>] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1c7/0x6c0 [btrfs]
 [25176.852189]   [<ffffffffa04e918e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x36e/0x450 [btrfs]
 [25176.852771]   [<ffffffffa04a98e0>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1e10/0x2d20 [btrfs]
 [25176.853315]   [<ffffffff8121c5b8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570
 [25176.853868]   [<ffffffff8121c851>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
 [25176.854406]   [<ffffffff8164da17>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
 [25176.854935] irq event stamp: 51506
 [25176.855511] hardirqs last  enabled at (51506): [<ffffffff810d4ce5>] vprintk_emit+0x225/0x5e0
 [25176.856059] hardirqs last disabled at (51505): [<ffffffff810d4b77>] vprintk_emit+0xb7/0x5e0
 [25176.856642] softirqs last  enabled at (50886): [<ffffffff81067a23>] __do_softirq+0x363/0x640
 [25176.857184] softirqs last disabled at (50949): [<ffffffff8106804d>] irq_exit+0x10d/0x120
 [25176.857746]
 other info that might help us debug this:
 [25176.858845]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
 [25176.859981]        CPU0
 [25176.860537]        ----
 [25176.861059]   lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
 [25176.861705]   <Interrupt>
 [25176.862272]     lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
 [25176.862881]
  *** DEADLOCK ***

Reason:
 Above warning is caused by:
 Interrupt
 -> bio_endio()
 -> ...
 -> scrub_put_ctx()
 -> scrub_free_ctx() *1
 -> ...
 -> mutex_lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);

 scrub_put_ctx() is allowed to be called in end_bio interrupt, but
 in code design, it will never call scrub_free_ctx(sctx) in interrupe
 context(above *1), because btrfs_scrub_dev() get one additional
 reference of sctx->refs, which makes scrub_free_ctx() only called
 withine btrfs_scrub_dev().

 Now the code runs out of our wish, because free sequence in
 scrub_pending_bio_dec() have a gap.

 Current code:
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 scrub_pending_bio_dec()            |  btrfs_scrub_dev
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
 wake_up(&sctx->list_wait);         |
                                    | scrub_put_ctx()
                                    | -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
 scrub_put_ctx(sctx);               |
 -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
 -> scrub_free_ctx()                |
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------

 We expected:
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 scrub_pending_bio_dec()            |  btrfs_scrub_dev
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
 wake_up(&sctx->list_wait);         |
 scrub_put_ctx(sctx);               |
 -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
                                    | scrub_put_ctx()
                                    | -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
                                    | -> scrub_free_ctx()
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------

Fix:
 Move scrub_pending_bio_dec() to a workqueue, to avoid this function run
 in interrupt context.
 Tested by check tracelog in debug.

Changelog v1->v2:
 Use workqueue instead of adjust function call sequence in v1,
 because v1 will introduce a bug pointed out by:
 Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      20b2e302
  7. 04 3月, 2015 7 次提交
  9. 17 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 15 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: scrub, fix sleep in atomic context · f55985f4
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      My previous patch "Btrfs: fix scrub race leading to use-after-free"
introduced the possibility to sleep in an atomic context, which happens
when the scrub_lock mutex is held at the time scrub_pending_bio_dec()
is called - this function can be called under an atomic context.
Chris ran into this in a debug kernel which gave the following trace:

[ 1928.950319] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:621
[ 1928.967334] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 149670, name: fsstress
[ 1928.981324] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 1928.989244] CPU: 24 PID: 149670 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W     3.19.0-rc7-mason+ #41
[ 1929.006418] Hardware name: ZTSYSTEMS Echo Ridge T4  /A9DRPF-10D, BIOS 1.07 05/10/2012
[ 1929.022207]  ffffffff81a22cf8 ffff881076e03b78 ffffffff816b8dd9 ffff881076e03b78
[ 1929.037267]  ffff880d8e828710 ffff881076e03ba8 ffffffff810856c4 ffff881076e03bc8
[ 1929.052315]  0000000000000000 000000000000026d ffffffff81a22cf8 ffff881076e03bd8
[ 1929.067381] Call Trace:
[ 1929.072344]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff816b8dd9>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x6e
[ 1929.083968]  [<ffffffff810856c4>] ___might_sleep+0x174/0x230
[ 1929.095352]  [<ffffffff810857d2>] __might_sleep+0x52/0x90
[ 1929.106223]  [<ffffffff816bb68f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x3b0
[ 1929.117951]  [<ffffffff810ab37d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 1929.129708]  [<ffffffffa05dc838>] scrub_pending_bio_dec+0x38/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1929.143370]  [<ffffffffa05dd0e0>] scrub_parity_bio_endio+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1929.157191]  [<ffffffff812fa603>] bio_endio+0x53/0xa0
[ 1929.167382]  [<ffffffffa05f96bc>] rbio_orig_end_io+0x7c/0xa0 [btrfs]
[ 1929.180161]  [<ffffffffa05f97ba>] raid_write_parity_end_io+0x5a/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 1929.194318]  [<ffffffff812fa603>] bio_endio+0x53/0xa0
[ 1929.204496]  [<ffffffff8130401b>] blk_update_request+0x1eb/0x450
[ 1929.216569]  [<ffffffff81096e58>] ? trigger_load_balance+0x78/0x500
[ 1929.229176]  [<ffffffff8144c74d>] scsi_end_request+0x3d/0x1f0
[ 1929.240740]  [<ffffffff8144ccac>] scsi_io_completion+0xac/0x5b0
[ 1929.252654]  [<ffffffff81441c50>] scsi_finish_command+0xf0/0x150
[ 1929.264725]  [<ffffffff8144d317>] scsi_softirq_done+0x147/0x170
[ 1929.276635]  [<ffffffff8130ace6>] blk_done_softirq+0x86/0xa0
[ 1929.288014]  [<ffffffff8105d92e>] __do_softirq+0xde/0x600
[ 1929.298885]  [<ffffffff8105df6d>] irq_exit+0xbd/0xd0
(...)

Fix this by using a reference count on the scrub context structure
instead of locking the scrub_lock mutex.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f55985f4
  13. 03 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix scrub race leading to use-after-free · de554a4f
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      While running a scrub on a kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y, I got
the following trace:

[68127.807663] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8803f8947a50
[68127.807663] IP: [<ffffffff8107da31>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0x122
[68127.807663] PGD 3003067 PUD 43e1f5067 PMD 43e030067 PTE 80000003f8947060
[68127.807663] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[68127.807663] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic btrfs xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop parport_pc processor parpo
[68127.807663] CPU: 2 PID: 3081 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc6-btrfs-next-3+ #4
[68127.807663] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[68127.807663] Workqueue: btrfs-btrfs-scrub btrfs_scrub_helper [btrfs]
[68127.807663] task: ffff880101fc5250 ti: ffff8803f097c000 task.ti: ffff8803f097c000
[68127.807663] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8107da31>]  [<ffffffff8107da31>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0x122
[68127.807663] RSP: 0018:ffff8803f097fbb8  EFLAGS: 00010093
[68127.807663] RAX: 0000000028dd386c RBX: ffff8803f8947a50 RCX: 0000000028dd3854
[68127.807663] RDX: 0000000000000018 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000001
[68127.807663] RBP: ffff8803f097fbd8 R08: 0000000000000004 R09: 0000000000000001
[68127.807663] R10: ffff880102620980 R11: ffff8801f3e8c900 R12: 000000000001d390
[68127.807663] R13: 00000000cabd13c8 R14: ffff8803f8947800 R15: ffff88037c574f00
[68127.807663] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88043dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[68127.807663] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[68127.807663] CR2: ffff8803f8947a50 CR3: 00000000b6481000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[68127.807663] Stack:
[68127.807663]  ffffffff823942a8 ffff8803f8947a50 ffff8802a3416f80 0000000000000000
[68127.807663]  ffff8803f097fc18 ffffffff8141e7c0 ffffffff81072948 000000000034f314
[68127.807663]  ffff8803f097fc08 0000000000000292 ffff8803f097fc48 ffff8803f8947a50
[68127.807663] Call Trace:
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff8141e7c0>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x55
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff81072948>] ? __wake_up+0x22/0x4b
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff81072948>] __wake_up+0x22/0x4b
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffffa0392327>] scrub_pending_bio_dec+0x32/0x36 [btrfs]
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffffa0395e70>] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x5a3/0x5c9 [btrfs]
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff810e0c7c>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x15/0x28
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff81078106>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x4c/0xb9
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffffa0372a7c>] normal_work_helper+0xf1/0x238 [btrfs]
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffffa0372d3d>] btrfs_scrub_helper+0x12/0x14 [btrfs]
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff810582d2>] process_one_work+0x1e4/0x3b6
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff81078180>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff81058dc9>] worker_thread+0x1fb/0x2a8
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff81058bce>] ? rescuer_thread+0x219/0x219
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff8105cd75>] kthread+0xdb/0xe3
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff8105cc9a>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x67/0x67
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff8141f1ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[68127.807663]  [<ffffffff8105cc9a>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x67/0x67
[68127.807663] Code: 39 c2 75 14 8d 8a 00 00 01 00 89 d0 f0 0f b1 0b 39 d0 0f 84 81 00 00 00 4c 69 2d 27 86 99 00 fa 00 00 00 45 31 e4 4d 39 ec 74 2b <8b> 13 89 d0 c1 e8 10 66 39 c2 75
[68127.807663] RIP  [<ffffffff8107da31>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x94/0x122
[68127.807663]  RSP <ffff8803f097fbb8>
[68127.807663] CR2: ffff8803f8947a50
[68127.807663] ---[ end trace d7045aac00a66cd8 ]---

This is due to a race that can happen in a very tiny time window and is
illustrated by the following sequence diagram:

         CPU 1                                                     CPU 2

                                                                btrfs_scrub_dev()
scrub_bio_end_io_worker()
   scrub_pending_bio_dec()
       atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight)
                                                                   wait sctx->bios_in_flight == 0
                                                                   wait sctx->workers_pending == 0
                                                                   mutex_lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock)
                                                                   (...)
                                                                   mutex_lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock)
                                                                   scrub_free_ctx(sctx)
                                                                      kfree(sctx)
       wake_up(&sctx->list_wait)
          __wake_up()
              spin_lock_irqsave(&sctx->list_wait->lock, flags)

Another variation of this scenario that results in the same use-after-free
issue is:

         CPU 1                                                     CPU 2

                                                                btrfs_scrub_dev()
                                                                   wait sctx->bios_in_flight == 0
scrub_bio_end_io_worker()
   scrub_pending_bio_dec()
       __wake_up(&sctx->list_wait)
          spin_lock_irqsave(&sctx->list_wait->lock, flags)
          default_wake_function()
              wake up task at CPU 2
                                                                   wait sctx->workers_pending == 0
                                                                   mutex_lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock)
                                                                   (...)
                                                                   mutex_lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock)
                                                                   scrub_free_ctx(sctx)
                                                                      kfree(sctx)
          spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sctx->list_wait->lock, flags)

Fix this by holding the scrub lock while doing the wakeup.

This isn't a recent regression, the issue as been around since the scrub
feature was added (2011, commit a2de733c).
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      de554a4f
  15. 28 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 22 1月, 2015 12 次提交
  19. 20 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 15 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  23. 03 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 03 12月, 2014 4 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs, raid56: fix use-after-free problem in the final device replace procedure on raid56 · 4245215d
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      The commit c404e0dc (Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing
procedure of the device replace) fixed a use-after-free problem
which happened when removing the source device at the end of device
replace, but at that time, btrfs didn't support device replace
on raid56, so we didn't fix the problem on the raid56 profile.
Currently, we implemented device replace for raid56, so we need
kick that problem out before we enable that function for raid56.

The fix method is very simple, we just increase the bio per-cpu
counter before we submit a raid56 io, and decrease the counter
when the raid56 io ends.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      4245215d
    • M
      Btrfs, replace: write raid56 parity into the replace target device · 76035976
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      This function reused the code of parity scrub, and we just write
the right parity or corrected parity into the target device before
the parity scrub end.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      76035976
    • M
      Btrfs, raid56: support parity scrub on raid56 · 5a6ac9ea
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      The implementation is:
- Read and check all the data with checksum in the same stripe.
  All the data which has checksum is COW data, and we are sure
  that it is not changed though we don't lock the stripe. because
  the space of that data just can be reclaimed after the current
  transction is committed, and then the fs can use it to store the
  other data, but when doing scrub, we hold the current transaction,
  that is that data can not be recovered, it is safe that read and check
  it out of the stripe lock.
- Lock the stripe
- Read out all the data without checksum and parity
  The data without checksum and the parity may be changed if we don't
  lock the stripe, so we need read it in the stripe lock context.
- Check the parity
- Re-calculate the new parity and write back it if the old parity
  is not right
- Unlock the stripe

If we can not read out the data or the data we read is corrupted,
we will try to repair it. If the repair fails. we will mark the
horizontal sub-stripe(pages on the same horizontal) as corrupted
sub-stripe, and we will skip the parity check and repair of that
horizontal sub-stripe.

And in order to skip the horizontal sub-stripe that has no data, we
introduce a bitmap. If there is some data on the horizontal sub-stripe,
we will the relative bit to 1, and when we check and repair the
parity, we will skip those horizontal sub-stripes that the relative
bits is 0.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      5a6ac9ea
    • M
      Btrfs, scrub: repair the common data on RAID5/6 if it is corrupted · af8e2d1d
      由 Miao Xie 提交于 
      This patch implement the RAID5/6 common data repair function, the
implementation is similar to the scrub on the other RAID such as
RAID1, the differentia is that we don't read the data from the
mirror, we use the data repair function of RAID5/6.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      af8e2d1d
  27. 21 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • G
      btrfs: fix dead lock while running replace and defrag concurrently · 32159242
      由 Gui Hecheng 提交于 
      This can be reproduced by fstests: btrfs/070

The scenario is like the following:

replace worker thread		defrag thread
---------------------		-------------
copy_nocow_pages_worker		btrfs_defrag_file
  copy_nocow_pages_for_inode	    ...
				  btrfs_writepages
  |A| lock_extent_bits		    extent_write_cache_pages
				|B|   lock_page
					__extent_writepage
		...			  writepage_delalloc
					    find_lock_delalloc_range
				|B| 	      lock_extent_bits
  find_or_create_page
    pagecache_get_page
  |A| lock_page

This leads to an ABBA pattern deadlock. To fix it,
o we just change it to an AABB pattern which means to @unlock_extent_bits()
  before we @lock_page(), and in this way the @extent_read_full_page_nolock()
  is no longer in an locked context, so change it back to @extent_read_full_page()
  to regain protection.

o Since we @unlock_extent_bits() earlier, then before @write_page_nocow(),
  the extent may not really point at the physical block we want, so we
  have to check it before write.
Signed-off-by: NGui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      32159242