Skip to content

L
linux

Linux-御风守护者 / linux
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 1
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 13 10月, 2007 12 次提交
  3. 16 8月, 2007 9 次提交
  5. 15 8月, 2007 12 次提交
  7. 14 8月, 2007 7 次提交
    • S
      [GFS2] Revert remounting w/o acl option leaves acls enabled · d18c4d68
      由 Steven Whitehouse 提交于 
      This reverts commit 569a7b6c. The
code was correct originally. The default setting for ACLs after a
remount should be to be the same as before the remount.
Signed-off-by: NAbhijith Das <adas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      d18c4d68
    • S
      [GFS2] Fix setting of inherit jdata attr · b9af7ca6
      由 Steven Whitehouse 提交于 
      Due to a mix up between the jdata attribute and inherit jdata attribute
it has not been possible to set the inherit jdata attribute on
directories. This is now fixed and the ioctl will report the inherit
jdata attribute for directories rather than the jdata attribute as it
did previously. This stems from our need to have the one bit in the
ioctl attr flags mean two different things according to whether the
underlying inode is a directory or not.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      b9af7ca6
    • S
      [GFS2] Fix incorrect error path in prepare_write() · a867bb28
      由 Steven Whitehouse 提交于 
      The error path in prepare_write() was incorrect in the (very rare) event
that the transaction fails to start. The following prevents a NULL
pointer dereference,
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      a867bb28
    • S
      [GFS2] Fix incorrect return code in rgrp.c · 6eefaf61
      由 Steven Whitehouse 提交于 
      The following patch fixes a bug where 0 was being used as a return code
to indicate "nothing to do" when in fact 0 was a valid block location
which might be returned by the function.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      6eefaf61
    • B
      [GFS2] soft lockup in rgblk_search · 24c73873
      由 Bob Peterson 提交于 
      This patch seems to fix the problem described in bugzilla bug 246114.
It was written by Steve Whitehouse with some tweaking by me.

The code was looping in the relatively new section of code designed to
search for and reuse unlinked inodes.  In cases where it was finding an
appropriate inode to reuse, it was looping around and finding the same
block over and over because a "<=" check should have been a "<" when
comparing the goal block to the last unlinked block found.
Signed-off-by: NBob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      24c73873
    • B
      [GFS2] soft lockup detected in databuf_lo_before_commit · bdcb8856
      由 Bob Peterson 提交于 
      This is part 2 of the patch for bug #245832, part 1 of which is already
in the git tree.

The problem was that sdp->sd_log_num_databuf was not always being
protected by the gfs2_log_lock spinlock, but the sd_log_le_databuf
(which it is supposed to reflect) was protected.  That meant there
was a timing window during which gfs2_log_flush called
databuf_lo_before_commit and the count didn't match what was
really on the linked list in that window.  So when it ran out of
items on the linked list, it decremented total_dbuf from 0 to -1 and
thus never left the "while(total_dbuf)" loop.

The solution is to protect the variable sdp->sd_log_num_databuf so
that the value will always match the contents of the linked list,
and therefore the number will never go negative, and therefore, the
loop will be exited properly.
Signed-off-by: NBob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      bdcb8856
    • D
      [DLM] fix basts for granted PR waiting CW · 36509258
      由 David Teigland 提交于 
      Fix a long standing bug where a blocking callback would be missed
when there's a granted lock in PR mode and waiting locks in both
PR and CW modes (and the PR lock was added to the waiting queue
before the CW lock).  The logic simply compared the numerical values
of the modes to determine if a blocking callback was required, but in
the one case of PR and CW, the lower valued CW mode blocks the higher
valued PR mode.  We just need to add a special check for this PR/CW
case in the tests that decide when a blocking callback is needed.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      36509258