Skip to content

L
linux

Linux-御风守护者 / linux
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 1
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 14 11月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 19 4月, 2008 2 次提交
  7. 15 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  9. 02 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  11. 23 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  13. 22 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • A
      Detach sched.h from mm.h · e8edc6e0
      由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于 
      First thing mm.h does is including sched.h solely for can_do_mlock() inline
function which has "current" dereference inside. By dealing with can_do_mlock()
mm.h can be detached from sched.h which is good. See below, why.

This patch
a) removes unconditional inclusion of sched.h from mm.h
b) makes can_do_mlock() normal function in mm/mlock.c
c) exports can_do_mlock() to not break compilation
d) adds sched.h inclusions back to files that were getting it indirectly.
e) adds less bloated headers to some files (asm/signal.h, jiffies.h) that were
   getting them indirectly

Net result is:
a) mm.h users would get less code to open, read, preprocess, parse, ... if
   they don't need sched.h
b) sched.h stops being dependency for significant number of files:
   on x86_64 allmodconfig touching sched.h results in recompile of 4083 files,
   after patch it's only 3744 (-8.3%).

Cross-compile tested on

	all arm defconfigs, all mips defconfigs, all powerpc defconfigs,
	alpha alpha-up
	arm
	i386 i386-up i386-defconfig i386-allnoconfig
	ia64 ia64-up
	m68k
	mips
	parisc parisc-up
	powerpc powerpc-up
	s390 s390-up
	sparc sparc-up
	sparc64 sparc64-up
	um-x86_64
	x86_64 x86_64-up x86_64-defconfig x86_64-allnoconfig

as well as my two usual configs.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e8edc6e0
  15. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] lockdep: annotate nfsd4 recover code · 4b75f78e
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      > =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 2.6.18-1.2724.lockdepPAE #1
> ---------------------------------------------
> nfsd/6884 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c04811e5>] vfs_rmdir+0x73/0xf4
>
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<f8dfa621>]
> nfsd4_clear_clid_dir+0x1f/0x3d [nfsd]
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 3 locks held by nfsd/6884:
>  #0:  (hash_sem){----}, at: [<f8de05eb>] nfsd+0x181/0x2ea [nfsd]
>  #1:  (client_mutex){--..}, at: [<f8df6d19>]
> nfsd4_setclientid_confirm+0x3b/0x2cf [nfsd]
>  #2:  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<f8dfa621>]
> nfsd4_clear_clid_dir+0x1f/0x3d [nfsd]
>
> stack backtrace:
>  [<c040524d>] dump_trace+0x69/0x1af
>  [<c04053ab>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x18/0x2c
>  [<c040595f>] show_trace+0xf/0x11
>  [<c0405a53>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
>  [<c043ca7a>] __lock_acquire+0x110/0x9b6
>  [<c043d91e>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x7a
>  [<c061a41b>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xde/0x234
>  [<c04811e5>] vfs_rmdir+0x73/0xf4
>  [<f8dfa62b>] nfsd4_clear_clid_dir+0x29/0x3d [nfsd]
>  [<f8dfa733>] nfsd4_remove_clid_dir+0xb8/0xf8 [nfsd]
>  [<f8df6e90>] nfsd4_setclientid_confirm+0x1b2/0x2cf [nfsd]
>  [<f8def19a>] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x137a/0x166c [nfsd]
>  [<f8de00d5>] nfsd_dispatch+0xc5/0x180 [nfsd]
>  [<f8d09d83>] svc_process+0x3bd/0x631 [sunrpc]
>  [<f8de0604>] nfsd+0x19a/0x2ea [nfsd]
>  [<c0404e27>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> Leftover inexact backtrace:
>  =======================

Some nesting annotation to the nfsd4 recovery code.
The vfs operations called will take dentry->d_inode->i_mutex.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4b75f78e
  17. 04 11月, 2006 1 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] NFS4: fix for recursive locking problem · 7ef55b8a
      由 Srinivasa Ds 提交于 
      When I was performing some operations on NFS, I got below error on server
side.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  2.6.19-prep #1
  ---------------------------------------------
  nfsd4/3525 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by nfsd4/3525:
   #0:  (client_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
   #1:  (&inode->i_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24

  stack backtrace:
   [<c04051ed>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x16a
   [<c04057fa>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c0405913>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c043b6f1>] __lock_acquire+0x778/0x99c
   [<c043be86>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
   [<c0611ceb>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x20a
   [<c0611e5a>] mutex_lock+0x21/0x24
   [<c047fd7e>] vfs_rmdir+0x76/0xf8
   [<f94b7ce9>] nfsd4_clear_clid_dir+0x2c/0x41 [nfsd]
   [<f94b7de9>] nfsd4_remove_clid_dir+0xb1/0xe8 [nfsd]
   [<f94b307b>] laundromat_main+0x9b/0x1c3 [nfsd]
   [<c04333d6>] run_workqueue+0x7a/0xbb
   [<c0433d0b>] worker_thread+0xd2/0x107
   [<c0436285>] kthread+0xc3/0xf2
   [<c0402005>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xb
  ===================================================================

Cause for this problem was,2 successive mutex_lock calls on 2 diffrent inodes ,as shown below

	static int
	nfsd4_clear_clid_dir(struct dentry *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
	{
	        int status;

	        /* For now this directory should already be empty, but we empty it of
        	 * any regular files anyway, just in case the directory was created by
	         * a kernel from the future.... */
        	nfsd4_list_rec_dir(dentry, nfsd4_remove_clid_file);
	        mutex_lock(&dir->d_inode->i_mutex);
	        status = vfs_rmdir(dir->d_inode, dentry);
	...

	int vfs_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
	{
	        int error = may_delete(dir, dentry, 1);

	        if (error)
	                return error;

	        if (!dir->i_op || !dir->i_op->rmdir)
        	        return -EPERM;

	        DQUOT_INIT(dir);

	        mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
	...

So I have developed the patch to overcome this problem.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivasa DS <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      7ef55b8a
  19. 21 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 03 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] VFS: Make filldir_t and struct kstat deal in 64-bit inode numbers · afefdbb2
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      These patches make the kernel pass 64-bit inode numbers internally when
communicating to userspace, even on a 32-bit system.  They are required
because some filesystems have intrinsic 64-bit inode numbers: NFS3+ and XFS
for example.  The 64-bit inode numbers are then propagated to userspace
automatically where the arch supports it.

Problems have been seen with userspace (eg: ld.so) using the 64-bit inode
number returned by stat64() or getdents64() to differentiate files, and
failing because the 64-bit inode number space was compressed to 32-bits, and
so overlaps occur.

This patch:

Make filldir_t take a 64-bit inode number and struct kstat carry a 64-bit
inode number so that 64-bit inode numbers can be passed back to userspace.

The stat functions then returns the full 64-bit inode number where
available and where possible.  If it is not possible to represent the inode
number supplied by the filesystem in the field provided by userspace, then
error EOVERFLOW will be issued.

Similarly, the getdents/readdir functions now pass the full 64-bit inode
number to userspace where possible, returning EOVERFLOW instead when a
directory entry is encountered that can't be properly represented.

Note that this means that some inodes will not be stat'able on a 32-bit
system with old libraries where they were before - but it does mean that
there will be no ambiguity over what a 32-bit inode number refers to.

Note similarly that directory scans may be cut short with an error on a
32-bit system with old libraries where the scan would work before for the
same reasons.

It is judged unlikely that this situation will occur because modern glibc
uses 64-bit capable versions of stat and getdents class functions
exclusively, and that older systems are unlikely to encounter
unrepresentable inode numbers anyway.

[akpm: alpha build fix]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      afefdbb2
  23. 21 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  25. 19 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  27. 10 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  29. 02 9月, 2005 2 次提交
  31. 08 7月, 2005 3 次提交
  33. 24 6月, 2005 4 次提交