- 28 6月, 2005 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rajesh Shah 提交于
When a pci child bus is created, add it to the parent's children list immediately rather than waiting till pci_bus_add_devices(). For hot-plug bridges/devices, pci_bus_add_devices() may be called much later, after they have been properly configured. In the meantime, this allows us to use the normal pci bus search functions for the hot-plug bridges/buses. Signed-off-by: NRajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Rajesh Shah 提交于
With root bridge and pci bridge hot-plug, new buses and devices can be added or removed at run time. Protect the pci bus and device lists with the pci lock when doing so. Signed-off-by: NRajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Rajesh Shah 提交于
When hot-plugging a root bridge, as we try to assign bus numbers we may find that the hotplugged hieratchy has more PCI to PCI bridges (i.e. bus requirements) than available. Make sure we don't step over an existing bus when that happens. Signed-off-by: NRajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Rajesh Shah 提交于
When you hot-plug a (root) bridge hierarchy, it may have p2p bridges and devices attached to it that have not been configured by firmware. In this case, we need to configure the devices before starting them. This patch separates device start from device scan so that we can introduce the configuration step in the middle. I kept the existing semantics for pci_scan_bus() since there are a huge number of callers to that function. Also, I have no way of testing the changes I made to the parisc files, so this needs review by those folks. Sorry for the massive cross-post, this touches files in many different places. Signed-off-by: NRajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 14 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Olof Johansson 提交于
On 64-bit machines, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK and other mask constants passed to pci_size() are 64-bit (for example ~0x0fUL). However, pci_size does comparisons between the u32 arguments and the mask, which will fail even though any result from pci_size is still just 32-bit. Changing the mask argument to u32 seems the obvious thing to do, since all arithmetic in the function is 32-bit and having a larger mask makes no sense. This triggered on a PPC64 system here where an adapter (VGA, as it happened) had a memory region base of 0xfe000000 and a sz of the same, matching the if (max == maxbase ...) test at the bottom of pci_size but failing the mask comparison. Quite a corner case which I guess explains why we haven't seen it until now. Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: NGreg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 04 5月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg KH 提交于
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-