Skip to content

L
linux

Linux-御风守护者 / linux
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 1
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 02 8月, 2005 5 次提交
    • I
      [PATCH] remove sys_set_zone_reclaim() · 6cb54819
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      This removes sys_set_zone_reclaim() for now.  While i'm sure Martin is
trying to solve a real problem, we must not hard-code an incomplete and
insufficient approach into a syscall, because syscalls are pretty much
for eternity.  I am quite strongly convinced that this syscall must not
hit v2.6.13 in its current form.

Firstly, the syscall lacks basic syscall design: e.g. it allows the
global setting of VM policy for unprivileged users. (!) [ Imagine an
Oracle installation and a SAP installation on the same NUMA box fighting
over the 'optimal' setting for this flag. What will they do? Will they
try to set the flag to their own preferred value every second or so? ]

Secondly, it was added based on a single datapoint from Martin:

 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=111763597218177&w=2

where Martin characterizes the numbers the following way:

 ' Run-to-run variability for "make -j" is huge, so these numbers aren't
   terribly useful except to see that with reclaim the benchmark still
   finishes in a reasonable amount of time. '

in other words: the fundamental problem has likely not been solved, only
a tendential move into the right direction has been observed, and a
handful of numbers were picked out of a set of hugely variable results,
without showing the variability data. How much variance is there
run-to-run?

I'd really suggest to first walk the walk and see what's needed to get
stable & predictable kernel compilation numbers on that NUMA box, before
adding random syscalls to tune a particular aspect of the VM ... which
approach might not even matter once the whole picture has been analyzed
and understood!

The third, most important point is that the syscall exposes VM tuning
internals in a completely unstructured way. What sense does it make to
have a _GLOBAL_ per-node setting for 'should we go to another node for
reclaim'? If then it might make sense to do this per-app, via numalib or
so.

The change is minimalistic in that it doesnt remove the syscall and the
underlying infrastructure changes, only the user-visible changes.  We
could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack, a'ka
/proc/sys/vm/swappiness, but even that looks quite counterproductive
when the generic approach is that we are trying to reduce the number of
external factors in the VM balance picture.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      6cb54819
    • D
      [PATCH] pcmcia: fix multiple insertion of multifunction cards · 5d546f54
      由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于 
      The ordering of setting and clearing device_add_pending went wrong on some
occasions, causing multifunction cards only to be handled correctly on the
first insertion, not on subsequent ones.
Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5d546f54
    • D
      [PATCH] pcmcia: defer ide-cs initialization after other IDE drivers started up · 2b8d4669
      由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于 
      Avoid registering PCMCIA CF cards before other IDE stuff. This means the risk
of /dev/hd* being re-ordered is lessened. The _sane_ thing to assert any
ordering is to use udev, nameif and so on, of course.
Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      2b8d4669
    • J
      [PATCH] inotify: fix race between the kernel and user space · b9c55d29
      由 John McCutchan 提交于 
      When you rm a watch, an IN_IGNORED event is sent down the event queue
with the watch descriptor that you just rm'd.

If you then add a watch you could get the ignored watch's wd and if you
haven't read the entire event queue, user space will think that it's
newly created watch was just ignored.

To avoid this problem we just use idr_get_new_above instead of
idr_get_new.
Signed-off-by: NJohn McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Signed-off-by: NRobert Love <rml@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b9c55d29
    • J
      [PATCH] inotify: fix file deletion by rename detection · 75449536
      由 John McCutchan 提交于 
      When a file is moved over an existing file that you are watching,
inotify won't send you a DELETE_SELF event and it won't unref the inode
until the inotify instance is closed by the application.
Signed-off-by: NJohn McCutchan <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>
Signed-off-by: NRobert Love <rml@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      75449536
  3. 01 8月, 2005 3 次提交
  5. 31 7月, 2005 30 次提交
  7. 30 7月, 2005 2 次提交