The caller allocated it, the caller should free it.

The only issue so far is that we could change the flp pointer even on an
error return if the fl_change callback failed.  But we can simply move
the flp assignment after the fl_change invocation, as the callers don't
care about the flp return value if the setlease call failed.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We modified setlease to require the caller to allocate the new lease in
the case of creating a new lease, but forgot to fix up the filesystem
methods.

Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We're depending on setlease to free the passed-in lease on failure.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Removing a lock shouldn't require any allocations; a failure due to
ENOMEM leaves the caller with a choice between retrying or giving up and
leaking an unused lease.

Next we should split the other lease calls into add and delete cases.
I wanted to start with just the bugfix.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Nothing depends on lock_flocks using the BKL
any more, so we can do the switch over to
a private spinlock.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

You currently cannot use "fasync_helper()" in an atomic environment to
insert a new fasync entry, because it will need to allocate the new
"struct fasync_struct".

Yet fcntl_setlease() wants to call this under lock_flocks(), which is in
the process of being converted from the BKL to a spinlock.

In order to fix this, this abstracts out the actual fasync list
insertion and the fasync allocations into functions of their own, and
teaches fs/locks.c to pre-allocate the fasync_struct entry.  That way
the actual list insertion can happen while holding the required
spinlock.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[bfields@redhat.com: rebase on top of my changes to Arnd's patch]
Tested-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

As suggested by Christoph Hellwig, this moves allocation
of new file locks out of generic_setlease into the
callers, nfs4_open_delegation and fcntl_setlease in order
to allow GFP_KERNEL allocations when lock_flocks has
become a spinlock.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The lock number in /proc/locks (first field) is implemented by a counter
(private field of struct seq_file) which is incremented at each call of
locks_show() and reset to 1 in locks_start() whatever the offset is.  It
should be reset according to the actual position in the list.  Because of
this, the numbering erratically restarts at 1 several times when reading a
long /proc/locks file.

Moreover, locks_show() can be called twice to print a single line thus
skipping a number.  The counter should be incremented in locks_next().

And last, pos is a loff_t, which can be bigger than a pointer, so we don't
use the pointer as an integer anymore, and allocate a loff_t instead.
Signed-off-by: NJerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This prepares the removal of the big kernel lock from the
file locking code. We still use the BKL as long as fs/lockd
uses it and ceph might sleep, but we can flip the definition
to a private spinlock as soon as that's done.
All users outside of fs/lockd get converted to use
lock_flocks() instead of lock_kernel() where appropriate.

Based on an earlier patch to use a spinlock from Matthew
Wilcox, who has attempted this a few times before, the
earliest patch from over 10 years ago turned it into
a semaphore, which ended up being slower than the BKL
and was subsequently reverted.

Someone should do some serious performance testing when
this becomes a spinlock, since this has caused problems
before. Using a spinlock should be at least as good
as the BKL in theory, but who knows...
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

... instead of mixing FMODE_ and O_
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Some comments misspell "should" or "shouldn't"; this fixes them. No code changes.
Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fs/locks.c:flock_lock_file() is the only user of
cond_resched_bkl()

This helper doesn't do anything more than cond_resched(). The
latter naming is enough to explain that we are rescheduling if
needed.

The bkl suffix suggests another semantics but it's actually a
synonym of cond_resched().
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1247725694-6082-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Pass posix-translated lock operations to security_file_lock
when invoked via sys_flock.
Signed-off-by: NSten Spans <Sten_Spans@genua.de>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

For every lock request lockd creates a new file_lock object
in nlmsvc_setgrantargs() by copying the passed in file_lock with
locks_copy_lock(). A filesystem can attach it's own lock_operations
vector to the file_lock. It has to be cleaned up at the end of the
file_lock's life. However, lockd doesn't do it today, yet it
asserts in nlmclnt_release_lockargs() that the per-filesystem
state is clean.
This patch fixes it by exporting locks_release_private() and adding
it to nlmsvc_freegrantargs(), to be symmetrical to creating a
file_lock in nlmsvc_setgrantargs().
Signed-off-by: NFelix Blyakher <felixb@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>

Wrap access to task credentials so that they can be separated more easily from
the task_struct during the introduction of COW creds.

Change most current->(|e|s|fs)[ug]id to current_(|e|s|fs)[ug]id().

Change some task->e?[ug]id to task_e?[ug]id().  In some places it makes more
sense to use RCU directly rather than a convenient wrapper; these will be
addressed by later patches.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Kmem cache passed to constructor is only needed for constructors that are
themselves multiplexeres.  Nobody uses this "feature", nor does anybody uses
passed kmem cache in non-trivial way, so pass only pointer to object.

Non-trivial places are:
	arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
	arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c

This is flag day, yes.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Acked-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jon Tollefson <kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix mm/slab.c]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix ubifs]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Allow filesystem's ->lock() method to call posix_lock_file() instead of
posix_lock_file_wait(), and return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED.  This makes it
possible to implement a such a ->lock() function, that works with the lock
manager, which needs the call to be asynchronous.

Now the vfs_lock_file() helper can be used, so this is a cleanup as well.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Extract common code into a function.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use a special error value FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED to mean that a locking
operation returned asynchronously.  This is returned by

  posix_lock_file() for sleeping locks to mean that the lock has been
  queued on the block list, and will be woken up when it might become
  available and needs to be retried (either fl_lmops->fl_notify() is
  called or fl_wait is woken up).

  f_op->lock() to mean either the above, or that the filesystem will
  call back with fl_lmops->fl_grant() when the result of the locking
  operation is known.  The filesystem can do this for sleeping as well
  as non-sleeping locks.

This is to make sure, that return values of -EAGAIN and -EINPROGRESS by
filesystems are not mistaken to mean an asynchronous locking.

This also makes error handling in fs/locks.c and lockd/svclock.c slightly
cleaner.
Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fl_insert and fl_remove are not used right now in the kernel. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

It acts exactly like a regular 'cond_resched()', but will not get
optimized away when CONFIG_PREEMPT is set.

Normal kernel code is already preemptable in the presense of
CONFIG_PREEMPT, so cond_resched() is optimized away (see commit
02b67cc3 "sched: do not do
cond_resched() when CONFIG_PREEMPT").

But when wanting to conditionally reschedule while holding a lock, you
need to use "cond_sched_lock(lock)", and the new function is the BKL
equivalent of that.

Also make fs/locks.c use it.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fcntl_setlk()/close() race prevention has a subtle hole - we need to
make sure that if we *do* have an fcntl/close race on SMP box, the
access to descriptor table and inode->i_flock won't get reordered.

As it is, we get STORE inode->i_flock, LOAD descriptor table entry vs.
STORE descriptor table entry, LOAD inode->i_flock with not a single
lock in common on both sides.  We do have BKL around the first STORE,
but check in locks_remove_posix() is outside of BKL and for a good
reason - we don't want BKL on common path of close(2).

Solution is to hold ->file_lock around fcheck() in there; that orders
us wrt removal from descriptor table that preceded locks_remove_posix()
on close path and we either come first (in which case eviction will be
handled by the close side) or we'll see the effect of close and do
eviction ourselves.  Note that even though it's read-only access,
we do need ->file_lock here - rcu_read_lock() won't be enough to
order the things.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Initial splitoff of the low-level stuff; taken to fdtable.h
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Commit 1a747ee0 ("locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return of
conflicting locks") changed fs/lockd/svclock.c to call
__locks_copy_lock() instead of locks_copy_lock(), but lockd can be built
as a module and __locks_copy_lock() is not exported, which causes a
build error

    ERROR: "__locks_copy_lock" [fs/lockd/lockd.ko] undefined!

with CONFIG_LOCKD=m.

Fix this by exporting __locks_copy_lock().
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The file_lock structure is used both as a heavy-weight representation of
an active lock, with pointers to reference-counted structures, etc., and
as a simple container for parameters that describe a file lock.

The conflicting lock returned from __posix_lock_file is an example of
the latter; so don't call the filesystem or lock manager callbacks when
copying to it.  This also saves the need for an unnecessary
locks_init_lock in the nfsv4 server.

Thanks to Trond for pointing out the error.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

fcntl_setlease() has a struct dentry* that is used only once; this patch
removes it.
Signed-off-by: NDavid M. Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

In generic_setlease(), the struct file_lock is allocated after tests for the
presence of conflicting readers/writers is done, despite the fact that the
allocation might block; this patch moves the allocation earlier.  A subsequent
set of patches will rely on this behavior to properly serialize between a
modified __break_lease() and generic_setlease().
Signed-off-by: NDavid M. Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

In generic_setlease(), we don't need to allocate a new struct file_lock
or check for readers or writers when called with F_UNLCK.
Signed-off-by: NDavid M. Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

Fixes a return-value mixup from 85c59580
"locks: Fix potential OOPS in generic_setlease()", in which -ENOMEM replaced
what had been intended to stay -EAGAIN in the variable "error".
Signed-off-by: NDavid M. Richter <richterd@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

None of these files use any of the functionality promised by
asm/semaphore.h.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>

Miklos Szeredi found the bug:

	"Basically what happens is that on the server nlm_fopen() calls
	nfsd_open() which returns -EACCES, to which nlm_fopen() returns
	NLM_LCK_DENIED.

	"On the client this will turn into a -EAGAIN (nlm_stat_to_errno()),
	which in will cause fcntl_setlk() to retry forever."

So, for example, opening a file on an nfs filesystem, changing
permissions to forbid further access, then trying to lock the file,
could result in an infinite loop.

And Trond Myklebust identified the culprit, from Marc Eshel and I:

	7723ec97 "locks: factor out
	generic/filesystem switch from setlock code"

That commit claimed to just be reshuffling code, but actually introduced
a behavioral change by calling the lock method repeatedly as long as it
returned -EAGAIN.

We assumed this would be safe, since we assumed a lock of type SETLKW
would only return with either success or an error other than -EAGAIN.
However, nfs does can in fact return -EAGAIN in this situation, and
independently of whether that behavior is correct or not, we don't
actually need this change, and it seems far safer not to depend on such
assumptions about the filesystem's ->lock method.

Therefore, revert the problematic part of the original commit.  This
leaves vfs_lock_file() and its other callers unchanged, while returning
fcntl_setlk and fcntl_setlk64 to their former behavior.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Tested-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Fix kernel-doc notation warnings in fs/.

Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/super.c:560): missing initial short description on line:
 *	mark_files_ro
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/locks.c:1277): missing initial short description on line:
 *	lease_get_mtime
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/locks.c:1277): missing initial short description on line:
 *	lease_get_mtime
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/namei.c:1368): missing initial short description on line:
 * lookup_one_len:  filesystem helper to lookup single pathname component
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/buffer.c:3221): missing initial short description on line:
 * bh_uptodate_or_lock: Test whether the buffer is uptodate
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/buffer.c:3240): missing initial short description on line:
 * bh_submit_read: Submit a locked buffer for reading
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:30): missing initial short description on line:
 * writeback_acquire: attempt to get exclusive writeback access to a device
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:47): missing initial short description on line:
 * writeback_in_progress: determine whether there is writeback in progress
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/fs-writeback.c:58): missing initial short description on line:
 * writeback_release: relinquish exclusive writeback access against a device.
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//include/linux/jbd.h:351): contents before sections
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//include/linux/jbd.h:561): contents before sections
Warning(mmotm-2008-0314-1449//fs/jbd/transaction.c:1935): missing initial short description on line:
 * void journal_invalidatepage()
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Some time ago the xxx_vnr() calls (e.g.  pid_vnr or find_task_by_vpid) were
_all_ converted to operate on the current pid namespace.  After this each call
like xxx_nr_ns(foo, current->nsproxy->pid_ns) is nothing but a xxx_vnr(foo)
one.

Switch all the xxx_nr_ns() callers to use the xxx_vnr() calls where
appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fcntl(F_GETLK,..) can return pid of process for not current pid namespace
(if process is belonged to the several namespaces).  It is true also for
pids in /proc/locks.  So correct behavior is saving pointer to the struct
pid of the process lock owner.
Signed-off-by: NVitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

interruptible_sleep_on_locked() is just an open-coded
wait_event_interruptible_timeout(), with the one difference that
interruptible_sleep_on_locked() doesn't bother to check the condition on
which it is waiting, depending instead on the BKL to avoid the case
where it blocks after the wakeup has already been called.

locks_block_on_timeout() is only used in one place, so it's actually
simpler to inline it into its caller.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

For such a short function (with such a long comment),
posix_locks_deadlock() seems to cause a lot of confusion.  Attempt to
make it a bit clearer:

	- Remove the initial posix_same_owner() check, which can never
	  pass (since this is only called in the case that block_fl and
	  caller_fl conflict)
	- Use an explicit loop (and a helper function) instead of a goto.
	- Rewrite the comment, attempting a clearer explanation, and
	  removing some uninteresting historical detail.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>