Skip to content

L
linux

Linux-御风守护者 / linux
与 Fork 源项目一致

从无法访问的项目Fork

通知 1
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 21 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 19 9月, 2006 4 次提交
  5. 17 9月, 2006 4 次提交
  7. 16 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 09 9月, 2006 2 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] NFS: large non-page-aligned direct I/O clobbers memory · e9f7bee1
      由 Trond Myklebust 提交于 
      The logic in nfs_direct_read_schedule and nfs_direct_write_schedule can
allow data->npages to be one larger than rpages.  This causes a page
pointer to be written beyond the end of the pagevec in nfs_read_data (or
nfs_write_data).

Fix this by making nfs_(read|write)_alloc() calculate the size of the
pagevec array, and initialise data->npages.

Also get rid of the redundant argument to nfs_commit_alloc().
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e9f7bee1
    • B
      [PATCH] ext3_getblk() should handle HOLE correctly · 3665d0e5
      由 Badari Pulavarty 提交于 
      It has been reported that ext3_getblk() is not doing the right thing and
triggering following WARN():

BUG: warning at fs/ext3/inode.c:1016/ext3_getblk()
 <c01c5140> ext3_getblk+0x98/0x2a6  <c03b2806> md_wakeup_thread+0x26/0x2a
 <c01c536d> ext3_bread+0x1f/0x88  <c01cedf9> ext3_quota_read+0x136/0x1ae
 <c018b683> v1_read_dqblk+0x61/0xac  <c0188f32> dquot_acquire+0xf6/0x107
 <c01ceaba> ext3_acquire_dquot+0x46/0x68  <c01897d4> dqget+0x155/0x1e7
 <c018a97b> dquot_transfer+0x3e0/0x3e9  <c016fe52> dput+0x23/0x13e
 <c01c7986> ext3_setattr+0xc3/0x240  <c0120f66> current_fs_time+0x52/0x6a
 <c017320e> notify_change+0x2bd/0x30d  <c0159246> chown_common+0x9c/0xc5
 <c02a222c> strncpy_from_user+0x3b/0x68  <c0167fe6> do_path_lookup+0xdf/0x266
 <c016841b> __user_walk_fd+0x44/0x5a  <c01592b9> sys_chown+0x4a/0x55
 <c015a43c> vfs_write+0xe7/0x13c  <c01695d4> sys_mkdir+0x1f/0x23
 <c0102a97> syscall_call+0x7/0xb

Looking at the code, it looks like it's not handle HOLE correctly.  It ends
up returning -EIO.  Here is the patch to fix it.

If we really want to be paranoid, we can allow return values 0 (HOLE), 1
(we asked for one block) and return -EIO for more than 1 block.  But I
really don't see a reason for doing it - all we need is the block# here.
(doesn't matter how many blocks are mapped).

ext3_get_blocks_handle() returns number of blocks it mapped.  It returns 0
in case of HOLE.  ext3_getblk() should handle HOLE properly (currently its
dumping warning stack and returning -EIO).
Signed-off-by: NBadari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      3665d0e5
  11. 07 9月, 2006 6 次提交
  13. 02 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 30 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 28 8月, 2006 11 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] /proc/meminfo: don't put spaces in names · f5ef68da
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      None of the other /proc/meminfo lines have a space in the identifier.  This
post-2.6.17 addition has the potential to break existing parsers, so use an
underscore instead (like Committed_AS).

Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f5ef68da
    • D
      [PATCH] fix up lockdep trace in fs/exec.c · 513627d7
      由 Dave Jones 提交于 
      This fixes the locking error noticed by lockdep:

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  ---------------------------------------------
  init/1 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&sighand->siglock){....}, at: [<c047a78a>] flush_old_exec+0x3ae/0x859

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&sighand->siglock){....}, at: [<c047a77a>] flush_old_exec+0x39e/0x859

  other info that might help us debug this:
  2 locks held by init/1:
   #0:  (tasklist_lock){..--}, at: [<c047a76a>] flush_old_exec+0x38e/0x859
   #1:  (&sighand->siglock){....}, at: [<c047a77a>] flush_old_exec+0x39e/0x859

  stack backtrace:
   [<c04051e1>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x54/0xfd
   [<c040579d>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
   [<c04058b6>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
   [<c043b33a>] __lock_acquire+0x773/0x997
   [<c043bacf>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6c
   [<c060630b>] _spin_lock+0x19/0x28
   [<c047a78a>] flush_old_exec+0x3ae/0x859
   [<c0498053>] load_elf_binary+0x4aa/0x1628
   [<c0479cab>] search_binary_handler+0xa7/0x24e
   [<c047b577>] do_execve+0x15b/0x1f9
   [<c04022b4>] sys_execve+0x29/0x4d
   [<c0403faf>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      513627d7
    • I
      [PATCH] lockdep: annotate reiserfs · 4df46240
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      reiserfs seems to have another locking level layer for the i_mutex due to the
xattrs-are-a-directory thing.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4df46240
    • B
      [PATCH] Manage jbd allocations from its own slabs · ea817398
      由 Badari Pulavarty 提交于 
      JBD currently allocates commit and frozen buffers from slabs.  With
CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG, its possible for an allocation to cross the page
boundary causing IO problems.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200127

So, instead of allocating these from regular slabs - manage allocation from
its own slabs and disable slab debug for these slabs.

[akpm@osdl.org: cleanups]
Signed-off-by: NBadari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ea817398
    • M
      [PATCH] eventpoll.c compile fix · 45f17e0c
      由 Masoud Asgharifard Sharbiani 提交于 
      Fix two compile failures in eventpoll.c code which would happen if
DEBUG_EPOLL is bigger than zero.
Signed-off-by: NMasoud Sharbiani <masouds@google.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      45f17e0c
    • E
      [PATCH] ufs: truncate correction · ecdc6394
      由 Evgeniy Dushistov 提交于 
      1) When we allocated last fragment in ufs_truncate, we read page, check
   if block mapped to address, and if not trying to allocate it.  This is
   wrong behaviour, fragment may be NOT allocated, but mapped, this
   happened because of "block map" function not checked allocated fragment
   or not, it just take address of the first fragment in the block, add
   offset of fragment and return result, this is correct behaviour in
   almost all situation except call from ufs_truncate.

2) Almost all implementation of UFS, which I can investigate have such
   "defect": if you have full disk, and try truncate file, for example 3GB
   to 2MB, and have hole in this region, truncate return -ENOSPC.  I tried
   evade from this problem, but "block allocation" algorithm is tied to
   right value of i_lastfrag, and fix of this corner case may slow down of
   ordinaries scenarios, so this patch makes behavior of "truncate"
   operations similar to what other UFS implementations do.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ecdc6394
    • E
      [PATCH] ufs: write to hole in big file · c37336b0
      由 Evgeniy Dushistov 提交于 
      On UFS, this scenario:
	open(O_TRUNC)
	lseek(1024 * 1024 * 80)
	write("A")
	lseek(1024 * 2)
	write("A")

may cause access to invalid address.

This happened because of "goal" is calculated in wrong way in block
allocation path, as I see this problem exists also in 2.4.

We use construction like this i_data[lastfrag], i_data array of pointers to
direct blocks, indirect and so on, it has ceratain size ~20 elements, and
lastfrag may have value for example 40000.

Also this patch fixes related to handling such scenario issues, wrong
zeroing metadata, in case of block(not fragment) allocation, and wrong goal
calculation, when we allocate block
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      c37336b0
    • M
      [PATCH] ext3 filesystem bogus ENOSPC with reservation fix · 08fb306f
      由 Mingming Cao 提交于 
      To handle the earlier bogus ENOSPC error caused by filesystem full of block
reservation, current code falls back to non block reservation, starts to
allocate block(s) from the goal allocation block group as if there is no
block reservation.

Current code needs to re-load the corresponding block group descriptor for
the initial goal block group in this case.  The patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      08fb306f
    • A
      [PATCH] ext2: prevent div-by-zero on corrupted fs · 607eb266
      由 Andries Brouwer 提交于 
      Mounting an ext2 filesystem with zero s_inodes_per_group will cause a
divide error.
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      607eb266
    • A
      [PATCH] Fix for minix crash · f5fb09fa
      由 Andries Brouwer 提交于 
      Mounting a (corrupt) minix filesystem with zero s_zmap_blocks
gives a spectacular crash on my 2.6.17.8 system, no doubt
because minix/inode.c does an unconditional
	minix_set_bit(0,sbi->s_zmap[0]->b_data);

[akpm@osdl.org: make labels conistent while we're there]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f5fb09fa
    • P
      [PATCH] lockdep: fix blkdev_open() warning · 6946bd63
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 07:57 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> ---------------------------------------------
> parted/7929 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<c105eb8d>] __blkdev_put+0x1e/0x13c
>
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<c105eec6>] do_open+0x72/0x3a8
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 1 lock held by parted/7929:
>  #0:  (&bdev->bd_mutex){--..}, at: [<c105eec6>] do_open+0x72/0x3a8
> stack backtrace:
>  [<c1003aad>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x15b
>  [<c100495f>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
>  [<c1004979>] dump_stack+0x17/0x1a
>  [<c102dee5>] __lock_acquire+0x753/0x99c
>  [<c102e3b0>] lock_acquire+0x4a/0x6a
>  [<c1204501>] mutex_lock_nested+0xc8/0x20c
>  [<c105eb8d>] __blkdev_put+0x1e/0x13c
>  [<c105ecc4>] blkdev_put+0xa/0xc
>  [<c105f18a>] do_open+0x336/0x3a8
>  [<c105f21b>] blkdev_open+0x1f/0x4c
>  [<c1057b40>] __dentry_open+0xc7/0x1aa
>  [<c1057c91>] nameidata_to_filp+0x1c/0x2e
>  [<c1057cd1>] do_filp_open+0x2e/0x35
>  [<c1057dd7>] do_sys_open+0x38/0x68
>  [<c1057e33>] sys_open+0x16/0x18
>  [<c1002845>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d

OK, I'm having a look here; its all new to me so bear with me.

blkdev_open() calls
  do_open(bdev, ...,BD_MUTEX_NORMAL) and takes
    mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_mutex, BD_MUTEX_NORMAL)

then something fails, and we're thrown to:

out_first: where
    if (bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
      blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains) which is
        __blkdev_put(bdev->bd_contains, BD_MUTEX_NORMAL) which does
          mutex_lock_nested(&bdev->bd_contains->bd_mutex, BD_MUTEX_NORMAL) <--- lockdep trigger

When going to out_first, dbev->bd_contains is either bdev or whole, and
since we take the branch it must be whole. So it seems to me the
following patch would be the right one:

[akpm@osdl.org: compile fix]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      6946bd63
  19. 27 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 25 8月, 2006 8 次提交