Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI EC that is used in MSI laptops knows some non-standard
commands for changing the screen brighntess and a few other things,
which are used by the msi-laptop.c driver. Unfortunately for these
commands no GPE events for IBF and OBF are triggered. Since nowadays
the EC code uses the ec_intr=1 mode by default, this causes these
operations to timeout, although they don't fail. In result, all
operations that you can do with the msi-laptop.c driver take more or
less 1s to complete, which is awfully slow.

In one of the more recent kernels (2.6.20?) the EC subsystem has been
revamped. With that change the EC timeout has been increased. before
that increase the MSI EC accesses were slow -- but not *that* slow,
hence I took notice of this limitation of the MSI EC hardware only very
recently.

The standard EC operations on the MSI EC as defined in the ACPI spec
support GPE events properly.

The following patch adds a new argument "force_poll" to the
ec_transaction() function (and friends). If set to 1, the function
will poll for IBF/OBF even if ec_intr=1 is enabled. If set to 0 the
current behaviour is used. The msi-laptop driver is modified to make
use of this new flag, so that OBF/IBF is polled for the special MSI EC
transactions -- but only for them.
Signed-off-by: NLennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
Acked-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Delay the read of the EC status register until
after the event that caused it occurs -- otherwise
it is possible to read and act on stale status that was
associated with the previous event.

Do this with a perpetually incrementing "event_count" to detect
when a new event occurs and it is safe to read status.

There is no workaround for polling mode -- it is inherently
exposed to reading and acting on stale status, since it
doesn't have an interrupt to tell it the event completed.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8110Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Cosmetic only.

Except in a single case, #define ACPI_*_DRIVER_NAME
were invoked 0 or 1 times.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

It was erroneously used as a description rather than a name.

ie. turn this:

lenb@se7525gp2:/sys> ls bus/acpi/drivers
ACPI AC Adapter Driver  ACPI Embedded Controller Driver  ACPI Power Resource Driver
ACPI Battery Driver     ACPI Fan Driver                  ACPI Processor Driver
ACPI Button Driver      ACPI PCI Interrupt Link Driver   ACPI Thermal Zone Driver
ACPI container driver   ACPI PCI Root Bridge Driver      hpet

into this:

lenb@se7525gp2:~> ls /sys/bus/acpi/drivers
ac  battery  button  container  ec  fan  hpet  pci_link  pci_root  power  processor  thermal
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

cosmetic only

Make "module name" actually match the file name.
Invoke with ';' as leaving it off confuses Lindent and gcc doesn't care.
Fix indentation where Lindent did get confused.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

if somebody uses "ec_intr=", lets be sure to
capture that in the dmesg even in the non-debug case.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The recent EC cleanup left a printk enabled on handler evaluation
resulting in a bunch of messages on normal operation, like so:

ACPI: EC: evaluating _Q60
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

dispatch_gpe() level.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7466Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Temporary measure until resume sequence is right.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Check for transaction attributes, not command index to decide on event to
expect.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>