1. 27 4月, 2007 4 次提交
  2. 15 2月, 2007 1 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.h · cd354f1a
      Tim Schmielau 提交于
      After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h
      recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes.
      There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need
      anything defined in there.  Presumably these includes were once needed for
      macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the
      course of cleaning it up.
      
      To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only
      removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble.
      
      Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha,
      arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig,
      allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all
      configs in arch/arm/configs on arm.  I also checked that no new warnings were
      introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted
      by unnecessarily included header files).
      Signed-off-by: NTim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
      Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cd354f1a
  3. 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 12 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 03 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] VFS: Make filldir_t and struct kstat deal in 64-bit inode numbers · afefdbb2
      David Howells 提交于
      These patches make the kernel pass 64-bit inode numbers internally when
      communicating to userspace, even on a 32-bit system.  They are required
      because some filesystems have intrinsic 64-bit inode numbers: NFS3+ and XFS
      for example.  The 64-bit inode numbers are then propagated to userspace
      automatically where the arch supports it.
      
      Problems have been seen with userspace (eg: ld.so) using the 64-bit inode
      number returned by stat64() or getdents64() to differentiate files, and
      failing because the 64-bit inode number space was compressed to 32-bits, and
      so overlaps occur.
      
      This patch:
      
      Make filldir_t take a 64-bit inode number and struct kstat carry a 64-bit
      inode number so that 64-bit inode numbers can be passed back to userspace.
      
      The stat functions then returns the full 64-bit inode number where
      available and where possible.  If it is not possible to represent the inode
      number supplied by the filesystem in the field provided by userspace, then
      error EOVERFLOW will be issued.
      
      Similarly, the getdents/readdir functions now pass the full 64-bit inode
      number to userspace where possible, returning EOVERFLOW instead when a
      directory entry is encountered that can't be properly represented.
      
      Note that this means that some inodes will not be stat'able on a 32-bit
      system with old libraries where they were before - but it does mean that
      there will be no ambiguity over what a 32-bit inode number refers to.
      
      Note similarly that directory scans may be cut short with an error on a
      32-bit system with old libraries where the scan would work before for the
      same reasons.
      
      It is judged unlikely that this situation will occur because modern glibc
      uses 64-bit capable versions of stat and getdents class functions
      exclusively, and that older systems are unlikely to encounter
      unrepresentable inode numbers anyway.
      
      [akpm: alpha build fix]
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      afefdbb2
  7. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 29 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] fix possible PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT overflows · 54b21a79
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      We've had two instances recently of overflows when doing
      
      	64_bit_value = (32_bit_value << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)
      
      I did a tree-wide grep of `<<.*PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT' and this is the result.
      
      - afs_rxfs_fetch_descriptor.offset is of type off_t, which seems broken.
      
      - jfs and jffs are limited to 4GB anyway.
      
      - reiserfs map_block_for_writepage() takes an unsigned long for the block -
        it should take sector_t.  (It'll fail for huge filesystems with
        blocksize<PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
      
      - cramfs_read() needs to use sector_t (I think cramsfs is busted on large
        filesystems anyway)
      
      - affs is limited in file size anyway.
      
      - I generally didn't fix 32-bit overflows in directory operations.
      
      - arm's __flush_dcache_page() is peculiar.  What if the page lies beyond 4G?
      
      - gss_wrap_req_priv() needs checking (snd_buf->page_base)
      
      Cc: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Cc: <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
      Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      54b21a79
  10. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4