- 15 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We should update reserve space if it is delalloc buffer and that is indicated by EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE flag. So use EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE in place of EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When we fallocate a region of the file which we had recently written, and which is still in the page cache marked as delayed allocated blocks we need to make sure we don't do the quota update on writepage path. This is because the needed quota updated would have already be done by fallocate. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 23 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We need to release the journal before we do a write_inode. Otherwise we could deadlock. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In the past, ext4_calc_metadata_amount(), and its sub-functions ext4_ext_calc_metadata_amount() and ext4_indirect_calc_metadata_amount() badly over-estimated the number of metadata blocks that might be required for delayed allocation blocks. This didn't matter as much when functions which managed the reserved metadata blocks were more aggressive about dropping reserved metadata blocks as delayed allocation blocks were written, but unfortunately they were too aggressive. This was fixed in commit 0637c6f4, but as a result the over-estimation by ext4_calc_metadata_amount() would lead to reserving 2-3 times the number of pending delayed allocation blocks as potentially required metadata blocks. So if there are 1 megabytes of blocks which have been not yet been allocation, up to 3 megabytes of space would get reserved out of the user's quota and from the file system free space pool until all of the inode's data blocks have been allocated. This commit addresses this problem by much more accurately estimating the number of metadata blocks that will be required. It will still somewhat over-estimate the number of blocks needed, since it must make a worst case estimate not knowing which physical blocks will be needed, but it is much more accurate than before. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Commit 0637c6f4 had a typo which caused the reserved metadata blocks to not be released correctly. Fix this. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 31 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
As reported in Kernel Bugzilla #14936, commit d21cd8f1 triggered a BUG in the function ext4_da_update_reserve_space() found in fs/ext4/inode.c. The root cause of this BUG() was caused by the fact that ext4_calc_metadata_amount() can severely over-estimate how many metadata blocks will be needed, especially when using direct block-mapped files. In addition, it can also badly *under* estimate how much space is needed, since ext4_calc_metadata_amount() assumes that the blocks are contiguous, and this is not always true. If the application is writing blocks to a sparse file, the number of metadata blocks necessary can be severly underestimated by the functions ext4_da_reserve_space(), ext4_da_update_reserve_space() and ext4_da_release_space(). This was the cause of the dq_claim_space reports found on kerneloops.org. Unfortunately, doing this right means that we need to massively over-estimate the amount of free space needed. So in some cases we may need to force the inode to be written to disk asynchronously in to avoid spurious quota failures. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Kennedy 提交于
When ext4_da_writepages increases the nr_to_write in writeback_control then it must always re-base the return value. Originally there was a (misguided) attempt prevent wbc.nr_to_write from going negative. In fact, it's necessary to allow nr_to_write to be negative so that wb_writeback() can correctly calculate how many pages were actually written. Signed-off-by: NRichard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 12月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Creating many small files in rapid succession on a small filesystem can lead to spurious ENOSPC; on a 104MB filesystem: for i in `seq 1 22500`; do echo -n > $SCRATCH_MNT/$i echo XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > $SCRATCH_MNT/$i done leads to ENOSPC even though after a sync, 40% of the fs is free again. This is because we reserve worst-case metadata for delalloc writes, and when data is allocated that worst-case reservation is not usually needed. When freespace is low, kicking off an async writeback will start converting that worst-case space usage into something more realistic, almost always freeing up space to continue. This resolves the testcase for me, and survives all 4 generic ENOSPC tests in xfstests. We'll still need a hard synchronous sync to squeeze out the last bit, but this fixes things up to a large degree. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Unlock i_block_reservation_lock before vfs_dq_reserve_block(). This patch fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14739 CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
We have to delay vfs_dq_claim_space() until allocation context destruction. Currently we have following call-trace: ext4_mb_new_blocks() /* task is already holding ac->alloc_semp */ ->ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used ->vfs_dq_claim_space() /* acquire dqptr_sem here. Possible deadlock */ ->ext4_mb_release_context() /* drop ac->alloc_semp here */ Let's move quota claiming to ext4_da_update_reserve_space() ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.32-rc7 #18 ------------------------------------------------------- write-truncate-/3465 is trying to acquire lock: (&s->s_dquot.dqptr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c025e73b>] dquot_claim_space+0x3b/0x1b0 but task is already holding lock: (&meta_group_info[i]->alloc_sem){++++..}, at: [<c02ce962>] ext4_mb_load_buddy+0xb2/0x370 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&meta_group_info[i]->alloc_sem){++++..}: [<c017d04b>] __lock_acquire+0xd7b/0x1260 [<c017d5ea>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xd0 [<c0527191>] down_read+0x51/0x90 [<c02ce962>] ext4_mb_load_buddy+0xb2/0x370 [<c02d0c1c>] ext4_mb_free_blocks+0x46c/0x870 [<c029c9d3>] ext4_free_blocks+0x73/0x130 [<c02c8cfc>] ext4_ext_truncate+0x76c/0x8d0 [<c02a8087>] ext4_truncate+0x187/0x5e0 [<c01e0f7b>] vmtruncate+0x6b/0x70 [<c022ec02>] inode_setattr+0x62/0x190 [<c02a2d7a>] ext4_setattr+0x25a/0x370 [<c022ee81>] notify_change+0x151/0x340 [<c021349d>] do_truncate+0x6d/0xa0 [<c0221034>] may_open+0x1d4/0x200 [<c022412b>] do_filp_open+0x1eb/0x910 [<c021244d>] do_sys_open+0x6d/0x140 [<c021258e>] sys_open+0x2e/0x40 [<c0103100>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 -> #2 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}: [<c017d04b>] __lock_acquire+0xd7b/0x1260 [<c017d5ea>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xd0 [<c0527191>] down_read+0x51/0x90 [<c02a5787>] ext4_get_blocks+0x47/0x450 [<c02a74c1>] ext4_getblk+0x61/0x1d0 [<c02a7a7f>] ext4_bread+0x1f/0xa0 [<c02bcddc>] ext4_quota_write+0x12c/0x310 [<c0262d23>] qtree_write_dquot+0x93/0x120 [<c0261708>] v2_write_dquot+0x28/0x30 [<c025d3fb>] dquot_commit+0xab/0xf0 [<c02be977>] ext4_write_dquot+0x77/0x90 [<c02be9bf>] ext4_mark_dquot_dirty+0x2f/0x50 [<c025e321>] dquot_alloc_inode+0x101/0x180 [<c029fec2>] ext4_new_inode+0x602/0xf00 [<c02ad789>] ext4_create+0x89/0x150 [<c0221ff2>] vfs_create+0xa2/0xc0 [<c02246e7>] do_filp_open+0x7a7/0x910 [<c021244d>] do_sys_open+0x6d/0x140 [<c021258e>] sys_open+0x2e/0x40 [<c0103100>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7/4){+.+...}: [<c017d04b>] __lock_acquire+0xd7b/0x1260 [<c017d5ea>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xd0 [<c0526505>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x2d0 [<c0260c9d>] vfs_load_quota_inode+0x4bd/0x5a0 [<c02610af>] vfs_quota_on_path+0x5f/0x70 [<c02bc812>] ext4_quota_on+0x112/0x190 [<c026345a>] sys_quotactl+0x44a/0x8a0 [<c0103100>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32 -> #0 (&s->s_dquot.dqptr_sem){++++..}: [<c017d361>] __lock_acquire+0x1091/0x1260 [<c017d5ea>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xd0 [<c0527191>] down_read+0x51/0x90 [<c025e73b>] dquot_claim_space+0x3b/0x1b0 [<c02cb95f>] ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x36f/0x380 [<c02d210a>] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x34a/0x530 [<c02c83fb>] ext4_ext_get_blocks+0x122b/0x13c0 [<c02a5966>] ext4_get_blocks+0x226/0x450 [<c02a5ff3>] mpage_da_map_blocks+0xc3/0xaa0 [<c02a6ed6>] ext4_da_writepages+0x506/0x790 [<c01de272>] do_writepages+0x22/0x50 [<c01d766d>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x6d/0x80 [<c01d7b9b>] filemap_flush+0x2b/0x30 [<c02a40ac>] ext4_alloc_da_blocks+0x5c/0x60 [<c029e595>] ext4_release_file+0x75/0xb0 [<c0216b59>] __fput+0xf9/0x210 [<c0216c97>] fput+0x27/0x30 [<c02122dc>] filp_close+0x4c/0x80 [<c014510e>] put_files_struct+0x6e/0xd0 [<c01451b7>] exit_files+0x47/0x60 [<c0146a24>] do_exit+0x144/0x710 [<c0147028>] do_group_exit+0x38/0xa0 [<c0159abc>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2ac/0x410 [<c0102849>] do_notify_resume+0xb9/0x890 [<c01032d2>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x21 other info that might help us debug this: 3 locks held by write-truncate-/3465: #0: (jbd2_handle){+.+...}, at: [<c02e1f8f>] start_this_handle+0x38f/0x5c0 #1: (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}, at: [<c02a57f6>] ext4_get_blocks+0xb6/0x450 #2: (&meta_group_info[i]->alloc_sem){++++..}, at: [<c02ce962>] ext4_mb_load_buddy+0xb2/0x370 stack backtrace: Pid: 3465, comm: write-truncate- Not tainted 2.6.32-rc7 #18 Call Trace: [<c0524cb3>] ? printk+0x1d/0x22 [<c017ac9a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0 [<c017d361>] __lock_acquire+0x1091/0x1260 [<c016bca2>] ? sched_clock_local+0xd2/0x170 [<c0178fd0>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x20/0xd0 [<c017d5ea>] lock_acquire+0xba/0xd0 [<c025e73b>] ? dquot_claim_space+0x3b/0x1b0 [<c0527191>] down_read+0x51/0x90 [<c025e73b>] ? dquot_claim_space+0x3b/0x1b0 [<c025e73b>] dquot_claim_space+0x3b/0x1b0 [<c02cb95f>] ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used+0x36f/0x380 [<c02d210a>] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x34a/0x530 [<c02c601d>] ? ext4_ext_find_extent+0x25d/0x280 [<c02c83fb>] ext4_ext_get_blocks+0x122b/0x13c0 [<c016bca2>] ? sched_clock_local+0xd2/0x170 [<c016be60>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x120/0x160 [<c016beef>] ? cpu_clock+0x4f/0x60 [<c0178fd0>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x20/0xd0 [<c052712c>] ? down_write+0x8c/0xa0 [<c02a5966>] ext4_get_blocks+0x226/0x450 [<c016be60>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x120/0x160 [<c016beef>] ? cpu_clock+0x4f/0x60 [<c017908b>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0x10 [<c02a5ff3>] mpage_da_map_blocks+0xc3/0xaa0 [<c01d69cc>] ? find_get_pages_tag+0x16c/0x180 [<c01d6860>] ? find_get_pages_tag+0x0/0x180 [<c02a73bd>] ? __mpage_da_writepage+0x16d/0x1a0 [<c01dfc4e>] ? pagevec_lookup_tag+0x2e/0x40 [<c01ddf1b>] ? write_cache_pages+0xdb/0x3d0 [<c02a7250>] ? __mpage_da_writepage+0x0/0x1a0 [<c02a6ed6>] ext4_da_writepages+0x506/0x790 [<c016beef>] ? cpu_clock+0x4f/0x60 [<c016bca2>] ? sched_clock_local+0xd2/0x170 [<c016be60>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x120/0x160 [<c016be60>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x120/0x160 [<c02a69d0>] ? ext4_da_writepages+0x0/0x790 [<c01de272>] do_writepages+0x22/0x50 [<c01d766d>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x6d/0x80 [<c01d7b9b>] filemap_flush+0x2b/0x30 [<c02a40ac>] ext4_alloc_da_blocks+0x5c/0x60 [<c029e595>] ext4_release_file+0x75/0xb0 [<c0216b59>] __fput+0xf9/0x210 [<c0216c97>] fput+0x27/0x30 [<c02122dc>] filp_close+0x4c/0x80 [<c014510e>] put_files_struct+0x6e/0xd0 [<c01451b7>] exit_files+0x47/0x60 [<c0146a24>] do_exit+0x144/0x710 [<c017b163>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x33/0x210 [<c0528137>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x30 [<c0147028>] do_group_exit+0x38/0xa0 [<c017babb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 [<c0159abc>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2ac/0x410 [<c0102849>] do_notify_resume+0xb9/0x890 [<c0178fd0>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x20/0xd0 [<c017b163>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x33/0x210 [<c0165b50>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 [<c017ba54>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x134/0x190 [<c017babb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 [<c0300ba4>] ? security_file_permission+0x14/0x20 [<c0215761>] ? vfs_write+0x131/0x190 [<c0214f50>] ? do_sync_write+0x0/0x120 [<c0103115>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x27/0x32 [<c01032d2>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x21 CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
This patch also fixes write vs chown race condition. Acked-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 09 12月, 2009 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We cannot rely on buffer dirty bits during fsync because pdflush can come before fsync is called and clear dirty bits without forcing a transaction commit. What we do is that we track which transaction has last changed the inode and which transaction last changed allocation and force it to disk on fsync. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Inside ->setattr() call both ATTR_UID and ATTR_GID may be valid This means that we may end-up with transferring all quotas. Add we have to reserve QUOTA_DEL_BLOCKS for all quotas, as we do in case of QUOTA_INIT_BLOCKS. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Currently all quota block reservation macros contains hard-coded "2" aka MAXQUOTAS value. This is no good because in some places it is not obvious to understand what does this digit represent. Let's introduce new macro with self descriptive name. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Acked-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When ext4_write_begin fails after allocating some blocks or generic_perform_write fails to copy data to write, we truncate blocks already instantiated beyond i_size. Although these blocks were never inside i_size, we have to truncate the pagecache of these blocks so that corresponding buffers get unmapped. Otherwise subsequent __block_prepare_write (called because we are retrying the write) will find the buffers mapped, not call ->get_block, and thus the page will be backed by already freed blocks leading to filesystem and data corruption. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 12月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 André Goddard Rosa 提交于
That is "success", "unknown", "through", "performance", "[re|un]mapping" , "access", "default", "reasonable", "[con]currently", "temperature" , "channel", "[un]used", "application", "example","hierarchy", "therefore" , "[over|under]flow", "contiguous", "threshold", "enough" and others. Signed-off-by: NAndré Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于
This patch was generated by git grep -E -i -l 'offest' | xargs -r perl -p -i -e 's/offest/offset/' Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 11月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add the facility for ext4_forget() to be called from ext4_free_blocks(). This simplifies the code in a large number of places, and centralizes most of the work of calling ext4_forget() into a single place. Also fix a bug in the extents migration code; it wasn't calling ext4_forget() when releasing the indirect blocks during the conversion. As a result, if the system cashed during or shortly after the extents migration, and the released indirect blocks get reused as data blocks, the journal replay would corrupt the data blocks. With this new patch, fixing this bug was as simple as adding the EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET flags to the call to ext4_free_blocks(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Convert the last two callers of ext4_journal_forget() to use ext4_forget() instead, and then fold ext4_journal_forget() into ext4_forget(). This reduces are code complexity and shortens our call stack. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The ext4_forget() function better belongs in ext4_jbd2.c. This will allow us to do some cleanup of the ext4_journal_revoke() and ext4_journal_forget() functions, as well as giving us better error reporting since we can report the caller of ext4_forget() when things go wrong. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When an error happened in ext4_splice_branch we failed to notice that in ext4_ind_get_blocks and mapped the buffer anyway. Fix the problem by checking for error properly. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 16 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The block validity checks used by ext4_data_block_valid() wasn't correctly written to check file systems with the meta_bg feature. Fix this. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
We need to be testing the i_flags field in the ext4 specific portion of the inode, instead of the (confusingly aliased) i_flags field in the generic struct inode. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 23 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
When an inode gets unlinked, the functions ext4_clear_blocks() and ext4_remove_blocks() call ext4_forget() for all the buffer heads corresponding to the deleted inode's data blocks. If the inode is a directory or a symlink, the is_metadata parameter must be non-zero so ext4_forget() will revoke them via jbd2_journal_revoke(). Otherwise, if these blocks are reused for a data file, and the system crashes before a journal checkpoint, the journal replay could end up corrupting these data blocks. Thanks to Curt Wohlgemuth for pointing out potential problems in this area. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
One of the invalid error paths in ext4_iget() forgot to brelse() the inode buffer head. Fix it by adding a brelse() in the common error return path, which also simplifies function. Thanks to Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> reporting the problem. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
The ext4_debug() call in ext4_end_io_dio() should be moved after the check to make sure that io_end is non-NULL. The comment above ext4_get_block_dio_write() ("Maximum number of blocks...") is a duplicate; the original and correct comment is above the #define DIO_MAX_BLOCKS up above. Based on review comments from Curt Wohlgemuth. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 11月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming 提交于
At the end of direct I/O operation, ext4_ext_direct_IO() always called ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(), regardless of whether there were any unwritten extents involved in the I/O or not. This commit adds a state flag so that ext4_ext_direct_IO() only calls ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() when necessary. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming 提交于
After a direct I/O request covering an uninitalized extent (i.e., created using the fallocate system call) or a hole in a file, ext4 will convert the uninitialized extent so it is marked as initialized by calling ext4_convert_unwritten_extents(). This function returns zero on success. This return value was getting returned by ext4_direct_IO(); however the file system's direct_IO function is supposed to return the number of bytes read or written on a success. By returning zero, it confused the direct I/O code into falling back to buffered I/O unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
When restart a transaction during a truncate operation, we drop and reacquire i_data_sem. After reacquiring i_data_sem, we need to discard any inode-based preallocation that might have been grabbed while we released i_data_sem (for example, if pdflush is allocating blocks and racing against the truncate). Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 10月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
On a 256M filesystem, doing this in a loop: xfs_io -F -f -d -c 'pwrite 0 64m' test rm -f test eventually leads to ENOSPC. (the xfs_io command does a 64m direct IO write to the file "test") As with other block allocation callers, it looks like we need to potentially retry the allocations on the initial ENOSPC. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
This fixes the following warning: fs/ext4/inode.c: In function 'ext4_dirty_inode': fs/ext4/inode.c:5615: warning: unused variable 'current_handle' We remove the jbd_debug() statement which does use current_handle, as it's not terribly important in the grand scheme of things. Thanks to Stephen Rothwell for pointing this out. Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In ext4_num_dirty_pages() we were calling page_buffers() before checking to see if the page actually had pages attached to it; this would cause a BUG check crash in the inline function page_buffers(). Thanks to Markus Trippelsdorf for reporting this bug. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于
This patch a problem that ext4_dirty_inode() was not calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() if the current_handle is not valid, which it is the case in no journal mode. It also removes a test for non-matching transaction which can never happen. Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 29 9月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Mayhar 提交于
This is a cleanup of commit 91ac6f43. Since ext4_mark_inode_dirty() has already called ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(), which in turn calls ext4_do_update_inode(), it's not necessary to have ext4_write_inode() call ext4_do_update_inode() in no journal mode. Indeed, it would be duplicated work. Reviewed-by: N"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
For async direct IO that covers holes or fallocate, the end_io callback function now queued the convertion work on workqueue but don't flush the work rightaway as it might take too long to afford. But when fsync is called after all the data is completed, user expects the metadata also being updated before fsync returns. Thus we need to flush the conversion work when fsync() is called. This patch keep track of a listed of completed async direct io that has a work queued on workqueue. When fsync() is called, it will go through the list and do the conversion. Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
Currently the DIO VFS code passes create = 0 when writing to the middle of file. It does this to avoid block allocation for holes, so as not to expose stale data out when there is a parallel buffered read (which does not hold the i_mutex lock). Direct I/O writes into holes falls back to buffered IO for this reason. Since preallocated extents are treated as holes when doing a get_block() look up (buffer is not mapped), direct IO over fallocate also falls back to buffered IO. Thus ext4 actually silently falls back to buffered IO in above two cases, which is undesirable. To fix this, this patch creates unitialized extents when a direct I/O write into holes in sparse files, and registering an end_io callback which converts the uninitialized extent to an initialized extent after the I/O is completed. Singed-Off-By: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
When writing into an unitialized extent via direct I/O, and the direct I/O doesn't exactly cover the unitialized extent, split the extent into uninitialized and initialized extents before submitting the I/O. This avoids needing to deal with an ENOSPC error in the end_io callback that gets used for direct I/O. When the IO is complete, the written extent will be marked as initialized. Singed-Off-By: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-