提交 98b8e4e5 编写于 作者: R Rafael J. Wysocki 提交者: Darren Hart (VMware)

platform/x86: wmi: Call acpi_wmi_init() later

Calling acpi_wmi_init() at the subsys_initcall() level causes ordering
issues to appear on some systems and they are difficult to reproduce,
because there is no guaranteed ordering between subsys_initcall()
calls, so they may occur in different orders on different systems.

In particular, commit 86d9f485 (mm/slab: fix kmemcg cache
creation delayed issue) exposed one of these issues where genl_init()
and acpi_wmi_init() are both called at the same initcall level, but
the former must run before the latter so as to avoid a NULL pointer
dereference.

For this reason, move the acpi_wmi_init() invocation to the
initcall_sync level which should still be early enough for things
to work correctly in the WMI land.

Link: https://marc.info/?t=151274596700002&r=1&w=2Reported-by: NJonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Reported-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Tested-by: NJonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
上级 532298b9
......@@ -1458,5 +1458,5 @@ static void __exit acpi_wmi_exit(void)
class_unregister(&wmi_bus_class);
}
subsys_initcall(acpi_wmi_init);
subsys_initcall_sync(acpi_wmi_init);
module_exit(acpi_wmi_exit);
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册