提交 8d1e5a1a 编写于 作者: S Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 提交者: Ingo Molnar

locking/rtmutex: Avoid a NULL pointer dereference on deadlock

With task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() returning early -EDEADLK we never
add the waiter to the waitqueue. Later, we try to remove it via
remove_waiter() and go boom in rt_mutex_top_waiter() because
rb_entry() gives a NULL pointer.

( Tested on v3.18-RT where rtmutex is used for regular mutex and I
  tried to get one twice in a row. )

Not sure when this started but I guess 397335f0 ("rtmutex: Fix
deadlock detector for real") or commit 3d5c9340 ("rtmutex:
Handle deadlock detection smarter").
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for v3.16 and later kernels
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1424187823-19600-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 e07e0d4c
......@@ -1193,7 +1193,8 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册