提交 7ef90146 编写于 作者: N NeilBrown

Don't unconditionally set in_sync on newly added device in raid5_reshape

When a reshape finds that it can add spare devices into the array,
those devices might already be 'in_sync' if they are beyond the old
size of the array, or they might not if they are within the array.

The first case happens when we change an N-drive RAID5 to an
N+1-drive RAID5.
The second happens when we convert an N-drive RAID5 to an
N+1-drive RAID6.

So set the flag more carefully.
Also, ->recovery_offset is only meaningful when the flag is clear,
so only set it in that case.

This change needs the preceding two to ensure that the non-in_sync
device doesn't get evicted from the array when it is stopped, in the
case where v0.90 metadata is used.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
上级 0261cd9f
......@@ -5361,9 +5361,11 @@ static int raid5_start_reshape(mddev_t *mddev)
!test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
if (raid5_add_disk(mddev, rdev) == 0) {
char nm[20];
set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
if (rdev->raid_disk >= conf->previous_raid_disks)
set_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
else
rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
added_devices++;
rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
sprintf(nm, "rd%d", rdev->raid_disk);
if (sysfs_create_link(&mddev->kobj,
&rdev->kobj, nm))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册