提交 314ff785 编写于 作者: I Ingo Molnar

mm/vmacache, sched/headers: Introduce 'struct vmacache' and move it from...

mm/vmacache, sched/headers: Introduce 'struct vmacache' and move it from <linux/sched.h> to <linux/mm_types>

The <linux/sched.h> header includes various vmacache related defines,
which are arguably misplaced.

Move them to mm_types.h and minimize the sched.h impact by putting
all task vmacache state into a new 'struct vmacache' structure.

No change in functionality.
Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 780de9dd
......@@ -360,6 +360,18 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
};
/*
* The per task VMA cache array:
*/
#define VMACACHE_BITS 2
#define VMACACHE_SIZE (1U << VMACACHE_BITS)
#define VMACACHE_MASK (VMACACHE_SIZE - 1)
struct vmacache {
u32 seqnum;
struct vm_area_struct *vmas[VMACACHE_SIZE];
};
struct core_thread {
struct task_struct *task;
struct core_thread *next;
......
......@@ -134,10 +134,6 @@ struct blk_plug;
struct filename;
struct nameidata;
#define VMACACHE_BITS 2
#define VMACACHE_SIZE (1U << VMACACHE_BITS)
#define VMACACHE_MASK (VMACACHE_SIZE - 1)
/*
* These are the constant used to fake the fixed-point load-average
* counting. Some notes:
......@@ -1550,9 +1546,10 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
struct mm_struct *mm, *active_mm;
/* per-thread vma caching */
u32 vmacache_seqnum;
struct vm_area_struct *vmacache[VMACACHE_SIZE];
/* Per-thread vma caching: */
struct vmacache vmacache;
#if defined(SPLIT_RSS_COUNTING)
struct task_rss_stat rss_stat;
#endif
......
......@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
static inline void vmacache_flush(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
memset(tsk->vmacache, 0, sizeof(tsk->vmacache));
memset(tsk->vmacache.vmas, 0, sizeof(tsk->vmacache.vmas));
}
extern void vmacache_flush_all(struct mm_struct *mm);
......
......@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ static void kgdb_flush_swbreak_addr(unsigned long addr)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < VMACACHE_SIZE; i++) {
if (!current->vmacache[i])
if (!current->vmacache.vmas[i])
continue;
flush_cache_range(current->vmacache[i],
flush_cache_range(current->vmacache.vmas[i],
addr, addr + BREAK_INSTR_SIZE);
}
}
......
......@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static void delete_vma_from_mm(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
mm->map_count--;
for (i = 0; i < VMACACHE_SIZE; i++) {
/* if the vma is cached, invalidate the entire cache */
if (curr->vmacache[i] == vma) {
if (curr->vmacache.vmas[i] == vma) {
vmacache_invalidate(mm);
break;
}
......
......@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline bool vmacache_valid_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
void vmacache_update(unsigned long addr, struct vm_area_struct *newvma)
{
if (vmacache_valid_mm(newvma->vm_mm))
current->vmacache[VMACACHE_HASH(addr)] = newvma;
current->vmacache.vmas[VMACACHE_HASH(addr)] = newvma;
}
static bool vmacache_valid(struct mm_struct *mm)
......@@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ static bool vmacache_valid(struct mm_struct *mm)
return false;
curr = current;
if (mm->vmacache_seqnum != curr->vmacache_seqnum) {
if (mm->vmacache_seqnum != curr->vmacache.seqnum) {
/*
* First attempt will always be invalid, initialize
* the new cache for this task here.
*/
curr->vmacache_seqnum = mm->vmacache_seqnum;
curr->vmacache.seqnum = mm->vmacache_seqnum;
vmacache_flush(curr);
return false;
}
......@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vmacache_find(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
return NULL;
for (i = 0; i < VMACACHE_SIZE; i++) {
struct vm_area_struct *vma = current->vmacache[i];
struct vm_area_struct *vma = current->vmacache.vmas[i];
if (!vma)
continue;
......@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vmacache_find_exact(struct mm_struct *mm,
return NULL;
for (i = 0; i < VMACACHE_SIZE; i++) {
struct vm_area_struct *vma = current->vmacache[i];
struct vm_area_struct *vma = current->vmacache.vmas[i];
if (vma && vma->vm_start == start && vma->vm_end == end) {
count_vm_vmacache_event(VMACACHE_FIND_HITS);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册