提交 0cfa5c07 编写于 作者: Y Yuchung Cheng 提交者: David S. Miller

tcp: fix cwnd undo on DSACK in F-RTO

This bug is discovered by an recent F-RTO issue on tcpm list
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg08794.html

The bug is that currently F-RTO does not use DSACK to undo cwnd in
certain cases: upon receiving an ACK after the RTO retransmission in
F-RTO, and the ACK has DSACK indicating the retransmission is spurious,
the sender only calls tcp_try_undo_loss() if some never retransmisted
data is sacked (FLAG_ORIG_DATA_SACKED).

The correct behavior is to unconditionally call tcp_try_undo_loss so
the DSACK information is used properly to undo the cwnd reduction.
Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 2d7a85f4
......@@ -2684,13 +2684,12 @@ static void tcp_process_loss(struct sock *sk, int flag, bool is_dupack)
bool recovered = !before(tp->snd_una, tp->high_seq);
if (tp->frto) { /* F-RTO RFC5682 sec 3.1 (sack enhanced version). */
if (flag & FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED) {
/* Step 3.b. A timeout is spurious if not all data are
* lost, i.e., never-retransmitted data are (s)acked.
*/
tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, true);
/* Step 3.b. A timeout is spurious if not all data are
* lost, i.e., never-retransmitted data are (s)acked.
*/
if (tcp_try_undo_loss(sk, flag & FLAG_ORIG_SACK_ACKED))
return;
}
if (after(tp->snd_nxt, tp->high_seq) &&
(flag & FLAG_DATA_SACKED || is_dupack)) {
tp->frto = 0; /* Loss was real: 2nd part of step 3.a */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册