提交 0701c53e 编写于 作者: M Marc Zyngier 提交者: Thomas Gleixner

genirq/msi: Do not use pci_msi_[un]mask_irq as default methods

When we create a generic MSI domain, that MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS
is set, and that any of .mask or .unmask are NULL in the irq_chip
structure, we set them to pci_msi_[un]mask_irq.

This is a bad idea for at least two reasons:
- PCI_MSI might not be selected, kernel fails to build (yes, this is
  legitimate, at least on arm64!)
- This may not be a PCI/MSI domain at all (platform MSI, for example)

Either way, this looks wrong. Move the overriding of mask/unmask to
the PCI counterpart, and panic is any of these two methods is not
set in the core code (they really should be present).
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444760085-27857-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
上级 25cb62b7
......@@ -1243,6 +1243,10 @@ static void pci_msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
BUG_ON(!chip);
if (!chip->irq_write_msi_msg)
chip->irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg;
if (!chip->irq_mask)
chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
if (!chip->irq_unmask)
chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
}
/**
......
......@@ -228,11 +228,7 @@ static void msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
{
struct irq_chip *chip = info->chip;
BUG_ON(!chip);
if (!chip->irq_mask)
chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
if (!chip->irq_unmask)
chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
BUG_ON(!chip || !chip->irq_mask || !chip->irq_unmask);
if (!chip->irq_set_affinity)
chip->irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册