- 01 12月, 2017 40 次提交
-
-
由 antirez 提交于
The approach used is to set a fixed header at the start of every listpack blob (that contains many entries). The header contains a "master" ID and fields, that are initially just obtained from the first entry inserted in the listpack, so that the first enty is always well compressed. Later every new entry is checked against these fields, and if it matches, the SAMEFIELD flag is set in the entry so that we know to just use the master entry flags. The IDs are always delta-encoded against the first entry. This approach avoids cascading effects in which entries are encoded depending on the previous entries, in order to avoid complexity and rewritings of the data when data is removed in the middle (which is a planned feature).
-
由 antirez 提交于
blockForKeys() was not freeing the allocation holding the ID when the key was already found busy. Fortunately the unit test checked explicitly for blocking multiple times for the same key (copying a regression in the blocking lists tests), so the bug was detected by the Redis test leak checker.
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
XADD was suboptimal in the first incarnation of the command, not being able to accept an ID (very useufl for replication), nor options for having capped streams. The keyspace notification for streams was not implemented.
-
由 antirez 提交于
A client may lose a lot of time between invocations of blocking XREAD, for example because it is processing the messages or for any other cause. When it returns back, it may provide a low enough message ID that the server will block to send an unreasonable number of messages in a single call. For this reason we set a COUNT when the client is blocked with XREAD calls, even if no COUNT is given. This is arbitrarily set to 1000 because it's enough to avoid slowing down the reception of many messages, but low enough to avoid to block.
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
With lists we need to signal only on key creation, but streams can provide data to clients listening at every new item added. To make this slightly more efficient we now track different classes of blocked clients to avoid signaling keys when there is nobody listening. A typical case is when the stream is used as a time series DB and accessed only by range with XRANGE.
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
After a few attempts it looked quite saner to just add the last item ID at the end of the serialized listpacks, instead of scanning the last listpack loaded from head to tail just to fetch it. It's a disk space VS CPU-and-simplicity tradeoff basically.
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
-
由 antirez 提交于
Related to #4483. As suggested by @soloestoy, we can retrieve the SHA1 from the body. Given that in the new implementation using AUX fields we ended copying around a lot to create new objects and strings, extremize such concept and trade CPU for space inside the RDB file.
-
由 antirez 提交于
See #4483. This is needed because luaCreateFunction() is now called from RDB loading code outside a client context.
-