Introducing XINFO STREAM <key> FULL

See issue #7105.

Streams items are similar to dictionaries, however they preserve both
the order, and allow for duplicated field names. So a map is not a
semantically sounding way to deal with this.

https://twitter.com/antirez/status/1248261087553880069

propagate_last_id is declared outside of the loop but used
only from within the loop. Once it's '1' it will never go
back to '0' and will replicate XSETID even for IDs that
don't actually change the last_id.
While not a serious bug (XSETID always used group->last_id
so there's no risk), it does causes redundant traffic
between master and its replicas

First, we must parse the IDs, so that we abort ASAP.
The return value of this command cannot be an error if
the client successfully acknowledged some messages,
so it should be executed in a "all or nothing" fashion.

Use built-in alsoPropagate mechanism that wraps commands
in MULTI/EXEC before sending them to replica/AOF

Fixes #6744.

This commit solves the following bug:
127.0.0.1:6379> XGROUP CREATE x grp $ MKSTREAM
OK
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 666 f v
"666-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
   2) 1) 1) "666-0"
         2) 1) "f"
            2) "v"
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 667 f v
"667-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XDEL x 667
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
   2) (empty array)

The root cause is that we use s->last_id in streamCompareID
while we should use the last *valid* ID

This commit solves several edge cases that are related to
exhausting the streamID limits: We should correctly calculate
the succeeding streamID instead of blindly incrementing 'seq'
This affects both XREAD and XADD.

Other (unrelated) changes:
Reply with a better error message when trying to add an entry
to a stream that has exhausted last_id

Calling XADD with 0-0 or 0 would result in creating an
empty key and storing it in the database.
Even worse, because XADD will reply with error the action
will not be replicated, creating a master-replica
inconsistency

Fixes GitHub issue #6492
Added stream support in RM_KeyType and RM_ValueLength.
Also moduleDelKeyIfEmpty was updated, even though it has
no effect now (It will be relevant when stream type direct
API will be coded - i.e. RM_StreamAdd)

rename RM_ServerInfoGetFieldNumerical RM_ServerInfoGetFieldSigned
move string2ull to util.c
fix leak in RM_GetServerInfo when duplicate info fields exist

The XCLAIM docs state the XCLAIM increments the delivery counter for
messages. This PR makes the code match the documentation - which seems
like the desired behaviour - whilst still allowing RETRYCOUNT to be
specified manually.

My understanding of the way streamPropagateXCLAIM() works is that this
change will safely propagate to replicas since retry count is pulled
directly from the streamNACK struct.

Fixes #5194

Fix issue #5785, in case create group on a key is not stream.

This commit fixes #5570. It is a similar bug to one fixed a few weeks
ago and is due to the range API to be called with NULL as "end ID"
parameter instead of repeating again the start ID, to be sure that we
selectively issue the entry with a given ID, or we get zero returned
(and we know we should emit a NULL reply).

This fixes the issue reported in #5570.
This was fixed the hard way, that is, propagating more information to
the lower level API about this being a request to read just the history,
so that the code is simpler and less likely to regress.

This bug had a double effect:

1. Sometimes entries may not be emitted, producing broken protocol where
the array length was greater than the emitted entires, blocking the
client waiting for more data.

2. Some other time the right entry was claimed, but a wrong entry was
returned to the client.

This fix should correct both the instances.

This fixes an overflow on 32-bit systems.

They play better with Lua scripting, otherwise Lua will see status
replies as "ok" = "string" which is very odd, and actually as @oranagra
reasoned in issue #5456 in the rest of the Redis code base there was no
such concern as saving a few bytes when the protocol is emitted.