1. 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 01 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 08 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 01 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 22 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      Make ActiveSupport::Autoload local · a1687e48
      José Valim 提交于
      Previously, ActiveSupport::Autoload was global and reserved
      for usage inside Rails. This pull request makes it local,
      fixes its test (they were not being run because its file
      was named wrongly) and make it part of Rails public API.
      a1687e48
  6. 22 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  7. 17 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  8. 19 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      Removed ActiveSupport#load_all! · 0f8f99b9
      Pan Thomakos 提交于
      This is no longer used and actually raises an error when trying to load
      `ActiveSupport::Dependencies`. I removed the related code and added the
      `Dependencies` module to the autoload list.
      0f8f99b9
  9. 03 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 01 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 20 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 20 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  14. 24 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  15. 10 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 23 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 07 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  18. 11 10月, 2010 2 次提交
  19. 24 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 20 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 19 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  22. 07 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • W
      Make many parts of Rails lazy. In order to facilitate this, · 39d6f9e1
      wycats 提交于
      add lazy_load_hooks.rb, which allows us to declare code that
      should be run at some later time. For instance, this allows
      us to defer requiring ActiveRecord::Base at boot time purely
      to apply configuration. Instead, we register a hook that should
      apply configuration once ActiveRecord::Base is loaded.
      
      With these changes, brings down total boot time of a
      new app to 300ms in production and 400ms in dev.
      
      TODO: rename base_hook
      39d6f9e1
  23. 01 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • Y
      For performance reasons, you can no longer call html_safe! on Strings.... · 4cbb9db0
      Yehuda Katz 提交于
      For performance reasons, you can no longer call html_safe! on Strings. Instead, all Strings are always not html_safe?. Instead, you can get a SafeBuffer from a String by calling #html_safe, which will SafeBuffer.new(self).
      
        * Additionally, instead of doing concat("</form>".html_safe), you can do
          safe_concat("</form>"), which will skip both the flag set, and the flag
          check.
        * For the first pass, I converted virtually all #html_safe!s to #html_safe,
          and the tests pass. A further optimization would be to try to use
          #safe_concat as much as possible, reducing the performance impact if
          we know up front that a String is safe.
      4cbb9db0
  24. 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  25. 05 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  26. 31 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 30 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  28. 28 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  30. 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 25 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  32. 14 9月, 2009 2 次提交