`inverse_of` on through associations was accidently removed/caused to
stop working in commit f8d2899d which was part of a refactoring on
`ThroughReflection`.

To fix we moved `inverse_of` and `check_validity_of_inverse!` to the
`AbstractReflection` so it's available to the `ThroughReflection`
without having to dup any methods. We then need to delegate `inverse_name`
method in `ThroughReflection`. `inverse_name` can't be moved to
`AbstractReflection` without moving methods that set the instance
variable `@automatic_inverse_of`.

This adds a test that ensures that `inverse_of` on a `ThroughReflection`
returns the correct class name, and the correct record for the inverse
relationship.

Fixes #21692

These new methods are used from the Active Record model layer to
determine which relations are viable to back a model. These new methods
allow us to change `conn.tables` in the future to only return tables and
no views. Same for `conn.table_exists?`.

The goal is to provide the following introspection methods on the
connection:

* `tables`
* `table_exists?`
* `views`
* `view_exists?`
* `data_sources` (views + tables)
* `data_source_exists?` (views + tables)

This reverts commit d5ba9a42, reversing
changes made to 30c50339.

Reason: This generate the dynalic finders more than one time

`lengh` should be `length`  

Since after 87d1aba3 `dependent: :destroy` callbacks on has_one
assocations run *after* destroy, it is possible that a nullification is
attempted on an already destroyed target:

    class Car < ActiveRecord::Base
      has_one :engine, dependent: :nullify
    end

    class Engine < ActiveRecord::Base
      belongs_to :car, dependent: :destroy
    end

    > car = Car.create!
    > engine = Engine.create!(car: car)
    > engine.destroy! # => ActiveRecord::ActiveRecordError: cannot update a
    >   destroyed record

In the above case, `engine.destroy!` deletes `engine` and *then* triggers the
deletion of `car`, which in turn triggers a nullification of `engine.car_id`.
However, `engine` is already destroyed at that point.

Fixes #21223.

If the through class has default scopes we should skip the statement
cache.

Closes #20745.

This makes it more clear that they are reserved keywords and also it
seems less redundant as the line already starts with the call to the
`enum` method.

As per the docs, `mark_for_destruction` should do nothing if `autosave`
is not set to true. We normally persist associations on a record no
matter what if the record is a new record, but we were always skipping
records which were `marked_for_destruction?`.

Fixes #20882

Also removes a false positive test that depends on the fixed bug:

At this time, counter_cache does not work with polymorphic relationships
(which is a bug). The test was added to make sure that no
StaleObjectError is raised when the car is destroyed. No such error is
currently raised because the lock version is not incremented by
appending a wheel to the car.

Furthermore, `assert_difference` succeeds because `car.wheels.count`
does not check the counter cache, but the collection size. The test will
fail if it is replaced with `car.wheels_count || 0`.

This code is so fucked. Things that cause this bug not to replicate:

- Defining the validation before the association (we end up calling
  `uniq!` on the errors in the autosave validation)
- Adding `accepts_nested_attributes_for` (I have no clue why. The only
  thing it does that should affect this is adds `autosave: true` to the
  inverse reflection, and doing that manually doesn't fix this).

This solution is a hack, and I'm almost certain there's a better way to
go about it, but this shouldn't cause a huge hit on validation times,
and is the simplest way to get it done.

Fixes #20874.

When preload is used in a default scope the preload_values were
returning nested arrays and causing the preloader to fail because it
doesn't know how to deal with nested arrays. So before calling preload!
we need to splat the arguments.

This is not needed to includes because it flatten its arguments.

Fixes #17511 and #17415

If your STI class looks like this:

```ruby
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
  self.store_full_sti_class = false

  class GoodCo < Company
  end

  class BadCo < Company
  end
end
```

The expectation (which is valid) is that the `type` in the database is saved as
`GoodCo` or `BadCo`. However, another expectation should be that setting `type`
to `GoodCo` would correctly instantiate the object as a `Company::GoodCo`. That
second expectation is what this should fix.

Fixes #19528

fix for mysql2 test

better test

Assert that counter_cache behaviour is not used on belongs_to or
has_many associations if the option is not given explicitly.

Previously has_many associations assumed a counter_cache was to be used
based on the presence of an appropriately named column. This is
inconsistent, since the inverse belongs_to association will not make
this assumption. See issues #19042 #8446.
This commit checks for the presence of the counter_cache key in the
options of either the has_many or belongs_to association as well as
ensuring that the *_count column is present.

If there was a polymorphic hm:t association with a scope AND second
non-scoped hm:t association on a model the polymorphic scope would leak
through into the call for the non-polymorhic hm:t association.

This would only break if `hotel.drink_designers` was called before
`hotel.recipes`. If `hotel.recipes` was called first there would be
no problem with the SQL.

Before (employable_type should not be here):
```
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "drink_designers" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON
"drink_designers"."id" = "chefs"."employable_id" INNER JOIN
"departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" = "departments"."id" WHERE
"departments"."hotel_id" = ? AND "chefs"."employable_type" = ?
[["hotel_id", 1], ["employable_type", "DrinkDesigner"]]
```

After:
```
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "recipes" INNER JOIN "chefs" ON "recipes"."chef_id"
= "chefs"."id" INNER JOIN "departments" ON "chefs"."department_id" =
"departments"."id" WHERE "departments"."hotel_id" = ?  [["hotel_id", 1]]
```

From the SQL you can see that `employable_type` was leaking through when
calling recipes. The solution is to dup the chain of the polymorphic
association so it doesn't get cached. Additionally, this follows
`scope_chain` which dup's the `source_reflection`'s `scope_chain`.

This required another model/table/relationship because the leak only
happens on a hm:t polymorphic that's called before another hm:t on the
same model.

I am specifically testing the SQL here instead of the number of records
becasue the test could pass if there was 1 drink designer recipe for the
drink designer chef even though the `employable_type` was leaking through.
This needs to specifically check that `employable_type` is not in the SQL
statement.

without replacement.

These files get modified whenever someone uses a tool like `sed`. Let's
just get this over with in one commit so it'd not adding diff noise to
something else.

Collection associations would have already been validated, but singular
associations were not.

Fixes #18735.

    Post.where('id = 1').or(Post.where('id = 2'))
    # => SELECT * FROM posts WHERE (id = 1) OR (id = 2)

[Matthew Draper & Gael Muller]

These callbacks will already have been defined when the association was
built. The check against `reflection.autosave` happens at call time, not
at define time, so simply modifying the reflection is sufficient.

Fixes #18704

When we made sure that the counter gets updated in memory, we only did
it on the has many side. The has many side only does the update if the
belongs to cannot. The belongs to side was updated to update the counter
cache (if it is able). This means that we need to check if the
belongs_to is able to update in memory on the has_many side.

We also found an inconsistency where the reflection names were used to
grab the association which should update the counter cache. Since
reflection names are now strings, this means it was using a different
instance than the one which would have the inverse instance set.

Fixes #18689

[Sean Griffin & anthonynavarre]

- Add check for not deleting previously created fixtures, to overcome sti fixtures from multiple files
- Added fixtures and fixtures test to verify the same

- Fixed wrong fixtures duplicating data insertion in same table

Addresses https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/ed56e596a0467390011bc9d56d462539776adac1#commitcomment-9145960

Update SecureToken Docs

Add Changelog entry for has_secure_token [ci skip]

Before this commit, returning `false` in an ActiveRecord `before_` callback
such as `before_create` would halt the callback chain.

After this commit, the behavior is deprecated: will still work until
the next release of Rails but will also display a deprecation warning.

The preferred way to halt a callback chain is to explicitly `throw(:abort)`.

This error only happens when the foreign key is missing.

Before this fix the following exception was being raised:

    NoMethodError: undefined method `val' for #<Arel::Nodes::BindParam:0x007fc64d19c218>

Now the message is:

    ActiveRecord::UnknownAttributeError: unknown attribute 'foreign_key' for Model.

Closes #7247.

Conflicts:
	activerecord/CHANGELOG.md
	activerecord/test/models/owner.rb

This is no longer required now that we are injecting a type caster
object into the Arel table, with the exception of uniqueness
validations. Since it calls `ConnectionAdapter#type_cast`, the value has
already been cast for the database. We don't want Arel to attempt to
cast it further, so we need to continue wrapping it in a quoted node.
This can potentially go away when this validator is refactored to make
better use of `where` or the predicate builder.

Part of the larger refactoring to remove type casting from Arel. We can
inform it that we already have the right type by wrapping the value in
an `Arel::Nodes::Quoted`. This commit can be reverted when we have
removed type casting from Arel in Rail 5.1