- 15 2月, 2011 10 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
* fixtures: remove unused methods extract database activity out of Fixtures instances extract rows that should be inserted to a method fixtures will return a list of tables that may be effected, delete existing fixtures will delete those tables
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
* jonleighton/association_fixes: Add a transaction wrapper in add_to_target. This means that #build will now also use a transaction. IMO this is reasonable given that the before_add and after_add callbacks might do anything, and this great consistency allows us to abstract out the duplicate code from #build and #create. Inline ensure_owner_is_persisted! as it is only called from one place @target should always be an array Rename add_record_to_target_with_callbacks to add_to_target Don't pass the block through build_record Move create and create! next to build Get rid of create_record as it is not only used in one place Get rid of AssociationCollection#save_record Fix test/cases/connection_pool_test.rb for sqlite3 in-memory db Add interpolation of association conditions back in, in the form of proc { ... } rather than instance_eval-ing strings
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
fixtures will return a list of tables that may be effected, delete existing fixtures will delete those tables
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 14 2月, 2011 16 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
[#6389 state:resolved]
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
[#6416 state:resolved]
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
Add a transaction wrapper in add_to_target. This means that #build will now also use a transaction. IMO this is reasonable given that the before_add and after_add callbacks might do anything, and this great consistency allows us to abstract out the duplicate code from #build and #create.
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
Add interpolation of association conditions back in, in the form of proc { ... } rather than instance_eval-ing strings
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
-
- 13 2月, 2011 12 次提交
-
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
由 Ernie Miller 提交于
-
由 Brian Lopez 提交于
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
由 Wojciech Wnętrzak 提交于
[#6419 state:committed] Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Sjoerd Andringa 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Ernie Miller 提交于
[#6423 state:committed] Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
Applied changes to stylesheet_link_tag from javascript_include_tag which corrects issues with ordering and duplicates.
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
This corrects two issues with javascript_include_tag, the order at which they are expanded, and removing duplicates. When individual js assets are specified, they will override the order of the same asset specified in an expansion. [#5938 state:resolved]
-
由 Carlos Antonio da Silva 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 12 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Stuart 提交于
As per the HTML 4.01 spec: Buttons created with the BUTTON element function just like buttons created with the INPUT element, but they offer richer rendering possibilities: the BUTTON element may have content. For example, a BUTTON element that contains an image functions like and may resemble an INPUT element whose type is set to "image", but the BUTTON element type allows content. Since rich content is the main purpose of the <button> element, it makes sense for the button_tag helper to accept a block. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#edef-BUTTON http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-button-element.html#the-button-elementSigned-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino and Emilio Tagua <santiago+emilioe@wyeworks.com>
-
由 Tom Stuart 提交于
"submit" is the default value of the <button> element's type attribute according to the HTML 4.01 and the HTML5 draft specs, so if button_tag is going to have a default, type="submit" is a more sensible choice than type="button". http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#adef-type-BUTTON http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-button-element.html#attr-button-typeSigned-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino and Emilio Tagua <santiago+emilioe@wyeworks.com>
-