1. 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 08 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • X
      code gardening: removes redundant selfs · a9dc4545
      Xavier Noria 提交于
      A few have been left for aesthetic reasons, but have made a pass
      and removed most of them.
      
      Note that if the method `foo` returns an array, `foo << 1`
      is a regular push, nothing to do with assignments, so
      no self required.
      a9dc4545
  3. 07 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 20 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      Make collection caching explicit. · b4558c10
      Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
      Having collection caching that wraps templates and automatically tries
      to infer if they are cachable proved to be too much of a hassle.
      
      We'd rather have it be something you explicitly turn on.
      
      This removes much of the code and docs to explain the previous automatic
      behavior.
      
      This change also removes scoped cache keys and passing cache_options.
      b4558c10
  5. 03 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 03 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 30 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      Cut string ActionView template allocations · 9b189a31
      schneems 提交于
      The instrument method creates new strings, the most common action to instrument is "!render_template` so we can detect when that action is occurring and use a frozen string instead.
      
      This change buys us 113,714 bytes of memory and 1,790 fewer objects per request.
      9b189a31
  8. 20 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      Freeze string literals when not mutated. · 5bb1d4d2
      schneems 提交于
      I wrote a utility that helps find areas where you could optimize your program using a frozen string instead of a string literal, it's called [let_it_go](https://github.com/schneems/let_it_go). After going through the output and adding `.freeze` I was able to eliminate the creation of 1,114 string objects on EVERY request to [codetriage](codetriage.com). How does this impact execution?
      
      To look at memory:
      
      ```ruby
      require 'get_process_mem'
      
      mem = GetProcessMem.new
      GC.start
      GC.disable
      1_114.times { " " }
      before = mem.mb
      
      after = mem.mb
      GC.enable
      puts "Diff: #{after - before} mb"
      
      ```
      
      Creating 1,114 string objects results in `Diff: 0.03125 mb` of RAM allocated on every request. Or 1mb every 32 requests.
      
      To look at raw speed:
      
      ```ruby
      require 'benchmark/ips'
      
      number_of_objects_reduced = 1_114
      
      Benchmark.ips do |x|
        x.report("freeze")    { number_of_objects_reduced.times { " ".freeze } }
        x.report("no-freeze") { number_of_objects_reduced.times { " " } }
      end
      ```
      
      We get the results
      
      ```
      Calculating -------------------------------------
                    freeze     1.428k i/100ms
                 no-freeze   609.000  i/100ms
      -------------------------------------------------
                    freeze     14.363k (± 8.5%) i/s -     71.400k
                 no-freeze      6.084k (± 8.1%) i/s -     30.450k
      ```
      
      Now we can do some maths:
      
      ```ruby
      ips = 6_226k # iterations / 1 second
      call_time_before = 1.0 / ips # seconds per iteration 
      
      ips = 15_254 # iterations / 1 second
      call_time_after = 1.0 / ips # seconds per iteration 
      
      diff = call_time_before - call_time_after
      
      number_of_objects_reduced * diff * 100
      
      # => 0.4530373333993266 miliseconds saved per request
      ```
      
      So we're shaving off 1 second of execution time for every 220 requests. 
      
      Is this going to be an insane speed boost to any Rails app: nope. Should we merge it: yep. 
      
      p.s. If you know of a method call that doesn't modify a string input such as [String#gsub](https://github.com/schneems/let_it_go/blob/b0e2da69f0cca87ab581022baa43291cdf48638c/lib/let_it_go/core_ext/string.rb#L37) please [give me a pull request to the appropriate file](https://github.com/schneems/let_it_go/blob/b0e2da69f0cca87ab581022baa43291cdf48638c/lib/let_it_go/core_ext/string.rb#L37), or open an issue in LetItGo so we can track and freeze more strings. 
      
      Keep those strings Frozen
      
      ![](https://www.dropbox.com/s/z4dj9fdsv213r4v/let-it-go.gif?dl=1)
      5bb1d4d2
  9. 08 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      Support explicit defintion of resouce name for collection caching. · 5a41d004
      Dov Murik 提交于
      If a template includes `# Template Collection: ...` anywhere in its
      source, that name will be used as the cache name for the partial that is
      rendered for the collection.
      
      This allows users to enable collection caching even if the template
      doesn't start with `<% cache ... do %>`.
      
      Moreover, the `# Template Collection: ...` notation is recognized in all
      template types (and template types other than ERB can define a
      resource_cache_call_pattern method to allow the `cache ... do` pattern
      to be recognized too).
      5a41d004
  10. 21 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • K
      Collections automatically cache and fetch partials. · 11644fd0
      Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
      Collections can take advantage of `multi_read` if they render one template
      and their partials begin with a cache call.
      
      The cache call must correspond to either what the collections elements are
      rendered as, or match the inferred name of the partial.
      
      So with a notifications/_notification.html.erb template like:
      
      ```ruby
      <% cache notification %>
        <%# ... %>
      <% end %>
      ```
      
      A collection would be able to use `multi_read` if rendered like:
      
      ```ruby
      <%= render @notifications %>
      <%= render partial: 'notifications/notification', collection: @notifications, as: :notification %>
      ```
      11644fd0
  11. 19 2月, 2015 2 次提交
  12. 25 10月, 2014 2 次提交
  13. 03 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  14. 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 28 8月, 2014 2 次提交
    • A
      remove useless parameter · cab85e99
      Aaron Patterson 提交于
      cab85e99
    • A
      remove dead code · 7a2622bc
      Aaron Patterson 提交于
      the ERB has already been compiled to Ruby code by the time we're calling
      module_eval.  Nothing that module eval raises will be caught by a blank
      `rescue`, so I think we can remove this
      7a2622bc
  16. 14 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 14 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  18. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • P
      Introduce `render :html` for render HTML string · 920f3ba2
      Prem Sichanugrist 提交于
      This is an option for to HTML content with a content type of
      `text/html`. This rendering option calls `ERB::Util.html_escape`
      internally to escape unsafe HTML string, so you will have to mark your
      string as html safe if you have any HTML tag in it.
      
      Please see #12374 for more detail.
      920f3ba2
  19. 25 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  20. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 08 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  22. 01 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 06 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  24. 18 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 08 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  26. 01 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 27 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  28. 26 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  29. 06 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  30. 30 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 29 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  32. 28 8月, 2012 3 次提交
  33. 03 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  34. 22 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      Prevent concurrent compilation of templates - closes #6400 · ef19e802
      Tom Clarke 提交于
      This addresses an issue where in multi-threaded environments
      multiple threads can attempt to compile a template at the same time,
      which occasionally causes particular templates to end up in a bad
      state.
      
      So, add synchronization such that only a single thread can attempt to
      compile a template at one time.
      ef19e802
  35. 21 5月, 2012 1 次提交