- 17 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Piotr Sarnacki 提交于
Don't explain except normal CRUD sql.
-
- 16 9月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 kennyj 提交于
-
由 Carlos Antonio da Silva 提交于
Fix find_in_batches with customized primary_key
-
由 Toshiyuki Kawanishi 提交于
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
Query for loading index info should be marked as SCHEMA.
-
- 15 9月, 2012 30 次提交
-
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
Clarify the documentation on the Rails::Application#call method
-
由 David Czarnecki 提交于
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
This fix the build http://travis-ci.org/#!/rails/rails/builds/2459981
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
fix the build
-
由 Steve Klabnik 提交于
-
由 kennyj 提交于
-
由 kennyj 提交于
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
Deprecate ActiveSupport::Benchmarkable#silence.
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
Improve Process::Status#to_json
-
由 Steve Klabnik 提交于
Because Process::Status has no instance_variables, the ActiveSupport version of #to_json produces {}, which isn't good. Therefore, we implement our own #as_json, which makes it useful again. Fixes #4857
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
Support for multiple etags in an If-None-Match header
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
-
由 Travis Warlick 提交于
This is a rebased version of #2520. Conflicts: actionpack/test/dispatch/request_test.rb
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
Few more warnings removed.
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Arun Agrawal 提交于
I found them when I was running warning mode on with railties See https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/3782
-
由 Steve Klabnik 提交于
Due to its lack of thread safety, we're deprecating this, and it will be removed in Rails 4.1. Fixes #4060.
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
Accidentally checked in commented test code. Fail. >_<
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
This method was first seen in 045713ee, and subsequently reimplemented in fb2325e3. According to @jeremy, this is okay to remove. He thinks it was added because at the time we didn't have much transaction state to keep track of, and he viewed it as a hack for us to track it internally, thinking it was better to ask the connection for the transaction state. Over the years we have added more and more state to track, a lot of which is impossible to ask the connection for. So it seems that this is just a relic of the passed and we will just track the state internally only.
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
The caller needs to have knowledge of the rollback either way, so do it all in the caller (#transaction)
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
This avoids us having to manually increment and decrement it.
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
-
由 Jon Leighton 提交于
This reverts commit c24c8852. Here's the explanation I just sent to @tenderlove: Hey, I've been thinking about about the transaction memory leak thing that we were discussing. Example code: post = nil Post.transaction do N.times { post = Post.create } end Post.transaction is going to create a real transaction and there will also be a (savepoint) transaction inside each Post.create. In an idea world, we'd like all but the last Post instance to be GC'd, and for the last Post instance to receive its after_commit callback when Post.transaction returns. I can't see how this can work using your solution where the Post itself holds a reference to the transaction it is in; when Post.transaction returns, control does not switch to any of Post's instance methods, so it can't trigger the callbacks itself. What we really want is for the transaction itself to hold weak references to the objects within the transaction. So those objects can be GC'd, but if they are not GC'd then the transaction can iterate them and execute their callbacks. I've looked into WeakRef implementations that are available. On 1.9.3, the stdlib weakref library is broken and we shouldn't use it. There is a better implementation here: https://github.com/bdurand/ref/blob/master/lib/ref/weak_reference/pure_ruby.rb We could use that, either by pulling in the gem or just copying the code in, but it still suffers from the limitation that it uses ObjectSpace finalizers. In my testing, this finalizers make GC quite expensive: https://gist.github.com/3722432 Ruby 2.0 will have a native WeakRef implementation (via ObjectSpace::WeakMap), hence won't be reliant on finalizers: http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4168 So the ultimate solution will be for everyone to use Ruby 2.0, and for us to just use ObjectSpace::WeakMap. In the meantime, we have basically 3 options: The first is to leave it as it is. The second is to use a finalizer-based weakref implementation and take the GC perf hit. The final option is to store object ids rather than the actual objects. Then use ObjectSpace._id2ref to deference the objects at the end of the transaction, if they exist. This won't stop memory use growing within the transaction, but it'll grow more slowly. I benchmarked the performance of _id2ref this if the object does or does not exist: https://gist.github.com/3722550 If it does exist it seems decent, but it's hugely more expensive if it doesn't, probably because we have to do the rescue nil. Probably most of the time the objects will exist. However the point of doing this optimisation is to allow people to create a large number of objects inside a transaction and have them be GC'd. So for that use case, we'd be replacing one problem with another. I'm not sure which of the two problems is worse. My feeling is that we should just leave this for now and come back to it when Ruby 2.0 is out. I'm going to revert your commit because I can't see how it solves this. Hope you don't mind... if I've misunderstood then let me know! Jon
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
- 14 9月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 José Valim 提交于
update CHANGELOG
-
由 Sergey Nartimov 提交于
Add entry about 24594110 and 95be790e.
-
由 José Valim 提交于
warning removed: shadowing outer local variable - message
-
由 José Valim 提交于
Build fix for ActionMailer
-
由 Jeremy Kemper 提交于
use presence method instead of checking for blank
-