1. 22 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  2. 21 1月, 2014 4 次提交
  3. 19 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • G
      Restore ActiveRecord states after a rollback for models w/o callbacks · 7386ffc7
      Godfrey Chan 提交于
      This fixes a regression (#13744) that was caused by 67d8bb96.
      
      In 67d8bb96, we introduced lazy rollback for records, such that the
      record's internal states and attributes are not restored immediately
      after a transaction rollback, but deferred until they are first
      accessed.
      
      This optimization is only performed when the model does not have any
      transactional callbacks (e.g. `after_commit` and `after_create`).
      
      Unfortunately, the models used to test the affected codepaths all
      comes with some sort of transactional callbacks. Therefore this
      codepath remains largely untested until now and as a result there are
      a few issues in the implementation that remains hidden until now.
      
      First, the `sync_with_transaction_state` (or more accurately,
      `update_attributes_from_transaction_state`) would perform the
      synchronization prematurely before a transaction is finalized (i.e.
      comitted or rolled back). As a result, when the actuall rollback
      happens, the record will incorrectly assumes that its internal states
      match the transaction state, and neglect to perform the restore.
      
      Second, `update_attributes_from_transaction_state` calls `committed!`
      in some cases. This in turns checks for the `destroyed?` state which
      also requires synchronization with the transaction stae, which causes
      an infnite recurrsion.
      
      This fix works by deferring the synchronization until the transaction
      has been finalized (addressing the first point), and also unrolled
      the `committed!` and `rolledback!` logic in-place (addressing the
      second point).
      
      It should be noted that the primary purpose of the `committed!` and
      `rolledback!` methods are to trigger the relevant transactional
      callbacks. Since this code path is only entered when there are no
      transactional callbacks on the model, this shouldn't be necessary. By
      unrolling the method calls, the intention here (to restore the states
      when necessary) becomes more clear.
      7386ffc7
  4. 18 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 17 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 16 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  7. 15 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  8. 14 1月, 2014 8 次提交
  9. 13 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 11 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • Y
      use enum labels as form values. Achieved by `_before_type_cast`. · 792c66f8
      Yves Senn 提交于
      Closes #13650, #13672
      
      This is an alternate implementation to solve #13650. Currently form fields
      contain the enum value (eg. "1"). This breaks because the setter `enum=`
      expects the label (eg. "active").
      
      ActiveRecord::Enum allows you to use labels in your application but store numbers.
      We should make sure that all parts after AR are dealing with labels and not the
      underlying mapping to a number.
      
      This patch defines `_before_type_cast` on every enum column to return the label.
      This method is later used to fetch the value to display in form fields.
      
      I deliberately copied the implementation of the enum getter instead of delegating to it.
      This allows you to overwrite the getter and for example return a `Value Object` but have it
      still work for form fields.
      792c66f8
  11. 10 1月, 2014 3 次提交
    • Y
      35cc3284
    • S
      Ensure Active Record connection consistency · 6cc03675
      schneems 提交于
      Currently Active Record can be configured via the environment variable `DATABASE_URL` or by manually injecting a hash of values which is what Rails does, reading in `database.yml` and setting Active Record appropriately. Active Record expects to be able to use `DATABASE_URL` without the use of Rails, and we cannot rip out this functionality without deprecating. This presents a problem though when both config is set, and a `DATABASE_URL` is present. Currently the `DATABASE_URL` should "win" and none of the values in `database.yml` are used. This is somewhat unexpected to me if I were to set values such as `pool` in the `production:` group of `database.yml` they are ignored.
      
      There are many ways that active record initiates a connection today:
      
      - Stand Alone (without rails)
        - `rake db:<tasks>`
        - ActiveRecord.establish_connection
       
      - With Rails
        - `rake db:<tasks>`
        - `rails <server> | <console>`
        - `rails dbconsole`
      
      
      We should make all of these behave exactly the same way. The best way to do this is to put all of this logic in one place so it is guaranteed to be used.
      
      Here is my prosed matrix of how this behavior should work:
      
      ```
      No database.yml
      No DATABASE_URL
      => Error
      ```
      
      ```
      database.yml present
      No DATABASE_URL
      => Use database.yml configuration
      ```
      
      ```
      No database.yml
      DATABASE_URL present
      => use DATABASE_URL configuration
      ```
      
      ```
      database.yml present
      DATABASE_URL present
      => Merged into `url` sub key. If both specify `url` sub key, the `database.yml` `url`
         sub key "wins". If other paramaters `adapter` or `database` are specified in YAML,
         they are discarded as the `url` sub key "wins".
      ```
      
      ### Implementation
      
      Current implementation uses `ActiveRecord::Base.configurations` to resolve and merge all connection information before returning. This is achieved through a utility class: `ActiveRecord::ConnectionHandling::MergeAndResolveDefaultUrlConfig`.
      
      To understand the exact behavior of this class, it is best to review the behavior in activerecord/test/cases/connection_adapters/connection_handler_test.rb though it should match the above proposal.
      6cc03675
    • A
      Revert "ask the fixture set for the sql statements" · da65fe9e
      Aaron Patterson 提交于
      This reverts commit 026d0555.
      
      Conflicts:
      	activerecord/lib/active_record/fixtures.rb
      
      Fixes #13383
      da65fe9e
  12. 08 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  13. 07 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • N
      Make change_table use object of current database adapter · eb589fed
      Nishant Modak 提交于
        - Earlier, change_table was creating database-agnostic object.
        - After this change, it will create correct object based on current
          database adapter.
        - This will ensure that create_table and change_table will get same objects.
        - This makes update_table_definition method public and nodoc.
        - Fixes #13577 and #13503
      eb589fed
  14. 06 1月, 2014 4 次提交
  15. 04 1月, 2014 4 次提交