Signed-off-by: NYehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>

[#3107 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

[#3104 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

[#3103 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

[#3102 state:incomplete]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

UrlRewriter#rewrite_url should call #to_param on the value given in :anchor option, just as #url_for does

[#2746 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

[#2252 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

Broke CI.

[#2252 state:open]

This reverts commit adedf728.

[#2754 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

[#2252 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

  * This initial implementation is a bit hackish, but it uses a normal middleware API
    so it's future-proof when we improve the internals.

[#3093 state:committed]
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>

Just a copy from Active Record (with tests). Each is a warpper function for
the equivalent scoped call to find eg first is a wrapper for find(:first)
Signed-off-by: NJoshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>

Similar to Active Record - it will raise ActiveResouce::ResourceInvalid if
the resource is not valid (ie if <tt>valid?</tt> returns false)

However - does not raise ActiveResource::ResourceNotFound if the callbacks
fail (callbacks have not yet been implemented) - it will just try to save
and raise if the callbacks all fail.

This is not ideal behaviour - but will do until we decide to change the
behaviour of save_with_validations to actually raise (rather than catch) the
ResourceInvalid exception.
Signed-off-by: NJoshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>

Active Record does not explode with RecordNotFound if you go looking for a
collection of objects - it just returns nil. Thus Active Resource should
also not explode.

After all - finding no objects that match a set of conditions is not
exceptional behaviour - unlike looking for a specific object with a given id
(which you'd expect to exist).

I've also added documentation to +find+ to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: NJoshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>

Pulled find-based tests into their own test case. This matches Active Record, and allows us to have one places where all find-tests are located, which will help when adding dynamic finders later.
Signed-off-by: NJoshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>

Moved all test cases into a new test/cases directory to match Active Record test directory structure.
Signed-off-by: NJoshua Peek <josh@joshpeek.com>