- 25 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 bogdanvlviv 提交于
-
- 24 10月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 João Fernandes 提交于
The documentation wrongly suggests that Time extensions to Numeric include methods months and years, when these belong to Integer. Update both classes and guides.
-
由 Dillon Welch 提交于
activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/acts_like.rb acts_like? Add a case statement to use direct symbols instead of string interpolation for the three scenarios I found in the Rails codebase: time, date, and string. For time/date/string, this change prevents two string allocations for each time the method is called and speeds up the method by ~2.7x. For other arguments, there is no memory difference and performance difference is within margin of error. begin require "bundler/inline" rescue LoadError => e $stderr.puts "Bundler version 1.10 or later is required. Please update your Bundler" raise e end gemfile(true) do source "https://rubygems.org" gem "rails", github: "rails/rails" gem "arel", github: "rails/arel" gem "benchmark-ips" end def allocate_count GC.disable before = ObjectSpace.count_objects yield after = ObjectSpace.count_objects after.each { |k,v| after[k] = v - before[k] } after[:T_HASH] -= 1 # probe effect - we created the before hash. GC.enable result = after.reject { |k,v| v == 0 } GC.start result end class Object def fast_acts_like?(duck) case duck when :time respond_to? :acts_like_time? when :date respond_to? :acts_like_date? when :string respond_to? :acts_like_string? else respond_to? :"acts_like_#{duck}?" end end end puts puts " acts_like? ".center(80, '=') puts obj = ''.freeze %i(time date string super_hacka).each do |type| puts " #{type} ".center(80, '=') puts " Memory Usage ".center(80, "=") puts puts "value.acts_like?" puts allocate_count { 1000.times { obj.acts_like?(type) } } puts "value.fast_acts_like?" puts allocate_count { 1000.times { obj.fast_acts_like?(type) } } puts puts " Benchmark.ips ".center(80, "=") puts Benchmark.ips do |x| x.report("acts_like?") { obj.acts_like?(type) } x.report("fast_acts_like?") { obj.fast_acts_like?(type) } x.compare! end end ================================== acts_like? ================================== ===================================== time ===================================== ================================= Memory Usage ================================= value.acts_like? {:FREE=>-1983, :T_STRING=>2052, :T_IMEMO=>1} value.fast_acts_like? {:FREE=>-1} ================================ Benchmark.ips ================================= Warming up -------------------------------------- acts_like? 104.281k i/100ms fast_acts_like? 155.523k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- acts_like? 1.688M (±10.7%) i/s - 8.342M in 5.003804s fast_acts_like? 4.596M (±12.1%) i/s - 22.551M in 5.000124s Comparison: fast_acts_like?: 4596162.4 i/s acts_like?: 1688163.8 i/s - 2.72x slower ===================================== date ===================================== ================================= Memory Usage ================================= value.acts_like? {:FREE=>-2001, :T_STRING=>2000} value.fast_acts_like? {:FREE=>-1} ================================ Benchmark.ips ================================= Warming up -------------------------------------- acts_like? 85.372k i/100ms fast_acts_like? 166.097k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- acts_like? 1.720M (± 8.3%) i/s - 8.537M in 5.001003s fast_acts_like? 4.695M (±10.1%) i/s - 23.254M in 5.010734s Comparison: fast_acts_like?: 4695493.1 i/s acts_like?: 1719637.9 i/s - 2.73x slower ==================================== string ==================================== ================================= Memory Usage ================================= value.acts_like? {:FREE=>-2001, :T_STRING=>2000} value.fast_acts_like? {:FREE=>-1} ================================ Benchmark.ips ================================= Warming up -------------------------------------- acts_like? 100.221k i/100ms fast_acts_like? 182.841k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- acts_like? 1.706M (± 7.3%) i/s - 8.519M in 5.022331s fast_acts_like? 3.968M (±22.8%) i/s - 18.650M in 5.006762s Comparison: fast_acts_like?: 3967972.9 i/s acts_like?: 1705773.7 i/s - 2.33x slower ================================= super_hacka ================================== ================================= Memory Usage ================================= value.acts_like? {:FREE=>-2004, :T_STRING=>2002, :T_SYMBOL=>1} value.fast_acts_like? {:FREE=>-2003, :T_STRING=>2001, :T_SYMBOL=>1} ================================ Benchmark.ips ================================= Warming up -------------------------------------- acts_like? 100.344k i/100ms fast_acts_like? 101.690k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- acts_like? 1.617M (± 7.5%) i/s - 8.128M in 5.055285s fast_acts_like? 1.534M (±10.1%) i/s - 7.627M in 5.031052s Comparison: acts_like?: 1617390.7 i/s fast_acts_like?: 1533897.3 i/s - same-ish: difference falls within error
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
-
- 23 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Kuruvilla 提交于
-
- 21 10月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
This basically reverts 8da30ad6
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
In order to keep this method compatible with the Ruby 2.5 version of Hash#slice. This bahavior is actually slightly incompatibile with previous versions of Active Support but it might not cause a real problem, since HWIA, the biggest use case of Hash subclassing here, already overrides `slice` to return another HWIA.
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
since r60229
-
- 20 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Max Felsher 提交于
Instructions to use `h` or `html_escape` in ERB templates were added to `actionpack/lib/action_view/template_handlers/erb.rb` in a1b03493 (Rails 2.1), but ERB has automatically escaped values since Rails 3.
-
- 16 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aditya Kapoor 提交于
-
- 10 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael Mendonça França 提交于
-
- 04 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 yuuji.yaginuma 提交于
-
由 Ryuta Kamizono 提交于
* Add missing credit * Add backticks * Fix indentation * Remove trailing spaces And some minor tweaks.
-
- 03 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Erich Soares Machado 提交于
Fixes ActiveSupport::Cache::FileStore#cleanup bug which prevented it from cleaning up the expired cache keys
-
- 01 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 yuuji.yaginuma 提交于
`new_credentials_configuration` is no longer used since 081a6ac6f7fd929798481f9ee333fb92b441356c.
-
- 30 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ryuta Kamizono 提交于
Follow up of #30728.
-
- 29 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
See the changelog entry. Remove `secrets.secret_token` from the bug report templates, since we don't accept bug reports for Rails versions that don't support a `secret_key_base`. [ claudiob & Kasper Timm Hansen ]
-
- 27 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 yuuji.yaginuma 提交于
Currently, `#transform_values`, `#select` and `#reject` return instance of `HashWithIndifferentAccess`. But `#transform_keys` returns instance of Hash. This behavior is a bit confusing. I think that `HashWithIndifferentAccess#transform_keys` should also return instance of `HashWithIndifferentAccess` as well as other methods.
-
- 25 9月, 2017 8 次提交
-
-
由 Francesco Rodriguez 提交于
I got this error in production using Puma in multi-threaded mode: ``` RuntimeError: Digest::Base cannot be directly inherited in Ruby from active_support/security_utils.rb:23:in `variable_size_secure_compare' from active_support/security_utils.rb:23:in `hexdigest' from active_support/security_utils.rb:23:in `digest' ``` Looks like Digest uses const_missing to load Digest::SHA256 (https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/ext/digest/lib/digest.rb#L8) - https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9494 - https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/c02fa39463a0c6bf698b01bc610135604aca2ff4
-
由 dixpac 提交于
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
It's become clear to me that the use case is still a bit muddy and the upgrade path is going to be tough for people to figure out. This attempts at understanding it better through documentation, but still needs follow up work. [ Michael Coyne & Kasper Timm Hansen ]
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
[ Michael Coyne & Kasper Timm Hansen ]
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
Noticed that verifiers and encryptors never once mentioned key generators and salts but only concerned themselves with generated secrets. Clears up the confusing naming around raw_key and secret as well. And makes the rotation API follow the constructor signature to the letter.
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
Spares users from passing in non-changing values explicitly. [ Michael Coyne & Kasper Timm Hansen ]
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
-
- 24 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Coyne 提交于
Both classes now have a rotate method where new instances are added for each call. When decryption or verification fails the next rotation instance is tried.
-
- 23 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 yuuji.yaginuma 提交于
Currently, bang version does not work with `InheritableOptions`. `InheritableOptions` treats the argument Hash as the default value. However, `Hash#fetch` does not use the default value when key is not found, so can not get the default value. So in bang version, should use `Hash#[]` instead of `Hash#fetch`.
-
- 20 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Manoj M J 提交于
-
- 19 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 yuuji.yaginuma 提交于
`digits_and_rounded_number` is unused since #26628
-
- 17 9月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 bogdanvlviv 提交于
-
由 bogdanvlviv 提交于
-
- 14 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kasper Timm Hansen 提交于
Removes most mentions of secrets.secret_key_base and explains credentials instead. Also removes some very stale upgrade notices about Rails 3/4.
-
- 12 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Heinemeier Hansson 提交于
* WIP: Add credentials using a generic EncryptedConfiguration class This is sketch code so far. * Flesh out EncryptedConfiguration and test it * Better name * Add command and generator for credentials * Use the Pathnames * Extract EncryptedFile from EncryptedConfiguration and add serializers * Test EncryptedFile * Extract serializer validation * Stress the point about losing comments * Allow encrypted configuration to be read without parsing for display * Use credentials by default and base them on the master key * Derive secret_key_base in test/dev, source it from credentials in other envs And document the usage. * Document the new credentials setup * Stop generating the secrets.yml file now that we have credentials * Document what we should have instead Still need to make it happen, tho. * [ci skip] Keep wording to `key base`; prefer defaults. Usually we say we change defaults, not "spec" out a release. Can't use backticks in our sdoc generated documentation either. * Abstract away OpenSSL; prefer MessageEncryptor. * Spare needless new when raising. * Encrypted file test shouldn't depend on subclass. * [ci skip] Some woordings. * Ditch serializer future coding. * I said flip it. Flip it good. * [ci skip] Move require_master_key to the real production.rb. * Add require_master_key to abort the boot process. In case the master key is required in a certain environment we should inspect that the key is there and abort if it isn't. * Print missing key message and exit immediately. Spares us a lengthy backtrace and prevents further execution. I've verified the behavior in a test app, but couldn't figure the test out as loading the app just exits immediately with: ``` /Users/kasperhansen/Documents/code/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/testing/isolation.rb:23:in `load': marshal data too short (ArgumentError) from /Users/kasperhansen/Documents/code/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/testing/isolation.rb:23:in `run' from /Users/kasperhansen/.rbenv/versions/2.4.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/minitest-5.10.2/lib/minitest.rb:830:in `run_one_method' from /Users/kasperhansen/.rbenv/versions/2.4.1/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/minitest-5.10.2/lib/minitest/parallel.rb:32:in `block (2 levels) in start' ``` It's likely we need to capture and prevent the exit somehow. Kernel.stub(:exit) didn't work. Leaving it for tomorrow. * Fix require_master_key config test. Loading the app would trigger the `exit 1` per require_master_key's semantics, which then aborted the test. Fork and wait for the child process to finish, then inspect the exit status. Also check we aborted because of a missing master key, so something else didn't just abort the boot. Much <3 to @tenderlove for the tip. * Support reading/writing configs via methods. * Skip needless deep symbolizing. * Remove save; test config reader elsewhere. * Move secret_key_base check to when we're reading it. Otherwise we'll abort too soon since we don't assign the secret_key_base to secrets anymore. * Add missing string literal comments; require unneeded yaml require. * ya ya ya, rubocop. * Add master_key/credentials after bundle. Then we can reuse the existing message on `rails new bc4`. It'll look like: ``` Using web-console 3.5.1 from https://github.com/rails/web-console.git (at master@ce985eb) Using rails 5.2.0.alpha from source at `/Users/kasperhansen/Documents/code/rails` Using sass-rails 5.0.6 Bundle complete! 16 Gemfile dependencies, 72 gems now installed. Use `bundle info [gemname]` to see where a bundled gem is installed. Adding config/master.key to store the master encryption key: 97070158c44b4675b876373a6bc9d5a0 Save this in a password manager your team can access. If you lose the key, no one, including you, can access anything encrypted with it. create config/master.key ``` And that'll be executed even if `--skip-bundle` was passed. * Ensure test app has secret_key_base. * Assign secret_key_base to app or omit. * Merge noise * Split options for dynamic delegation into its own method and use deep symbols to make it work * Update error to point to credentials instead * Appease Rubocop * Validate secret_key_base when reading it. Instead of relying on the validation in key_generator move that into secret_key_base itself. * Fix generator and secrets test. Manually add config.read_encrypted_secrets since it's not there by default anymore. Move mentions of config/secrets.yml to config/credentials.yml.enc. * Remove files I have no idea how they got here. * [ci skip] swap secrets for credentials. * [ci skip] And now, changelogs are coming.
-
- 01 9月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Akira Matsuda 提交于
since r59328
-
-
由 Matthew Draper 提交于
-
由 Matthew Draper 提交于
Don't use remove_method or remove_possible_method just before a new definition: at best the purpose is unclear, and at worst it creates a race condition. Instead, prefer redefine_method when practical, and silence_redefinition_of_method otherwise.
-