- 26 12月, 2014 10 次提交
-
-
由 Guillermo Iguaran 提交于
Fixed warning `possible reference to past scope` from railties
-
由 Vipul A M 提交于
-
由 Guillermo Iguaran 提交于
Fixed AR warning on ruby 2.2
-
由 Guillermo Iguaran 提交于
Targeting 2.2
-
由 Guillermo Iguaran 提交于
Remove unnecessary double space
-
由 Guillermo Iguaran 提交于
Remove ActionController::ModelNaming
-
由 Kenta Okamoto 提交于
-
由 Kyle Decot 提交于
-
由 Zachary Scott 提交于
-
由 Vipul A M 提交于
-
- 25 12月, 2014 11 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Draper 提交于
Check for Rails.env instead of Rails
-
由 Pavel Penkov 提交于
`Rails` constant is added by rails-html-sanitizer leading to bugs in non-Rails apps using ActiveRecord and ActionMailer
-
由 claudiob 提交于
The methods in these modules are not used anywhere. They used to be invoked in polymorphic_routes.rb but their usage was removed in e8210450. What is your opinion about removing these methods? They do belong to the public API, but in reality their code has already been duplicated to ActionView::ModelNaming, since they are used by methods like `dom_id` and `dom_class` to associated records with DOM elements (in ActionView). Please tell me if you think that removing this module is a good idea and, in that case, if the PR is okay as it is, or you'd rather start by showing a deprecation message, and remove the module in Rails 5.1.
-
由 Zachary Scott 提交于
List the Active Support Instrumentation guide in the index (as WIP)
-
由 Zachary Scott 提交于
-
由 Zachary Scott 提交于
Fix grammar in Caching with Rails docs
-
由 Elaine Fang 提交于
-
由 Robin Dupret 提交于
-
由 Ivan Tkalin 提交于
-
由 Arun Agrawal 提交于
Fix bug in ActionMailer guide.
-
由 Dan Bernier 提交于
When setting a mailer's default from address, you have to pass a hash with a `:from` key; you can't pass just an email address.
-
- 24 12月, 2014 17 次提交
-
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Add support for Reply-To field in mail_to helper
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Removed unused parameter to cookie serialize method
-
由 Vipul A M 提交于
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Describe full behaviour of Active Record's attribute query methods
-
由 Michael D.W. Prendergast 提交于
Clarify that query methods have a custom definition of whether a numeric value is present. [ci skip] The way Active Record query methods handle numeric values is a special case, and is not part of Rails's standard definition of present. This update attempts to make this more clear in the docs, so that people don't expect Object#present? to return false if used on a number that is zero.
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
References #18148.
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
-
由 Xavier Noria 提交于
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Remove unneeded special case to calculate size for has_many :through
-
由 Bogdan Gusiev 提交于
All cases are properly handled in CollectionAssociation for all subclasses of this association
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
[ci skip]
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
We were ignoring the `default_value?` escape clause in the serialized type, which caused the default value to always be treated as changed. Fixes #18169
-
由 Guo Xiang Tan 提交于
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
The code for `TableDefinition#references` and `SchemaStatements#add_reference` were almost identical both structurally, and in terms of domain knowledge. This removes that duplication into a common class, using the `Table` API as the expected interface of its collaborator.
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
This isn't Seattle.rb, @senny. ;)
-
- 23 12月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Fix connection leak when a thread checks in additional connections.
-
由 Sean Griffin 提交于
Remove block from super
-