1. 17 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 28 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 18 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 01 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      Attribute assignment and type casting has nothing to do with columns · 70ac0729
      Sean Griffin 提交于
      It's finally finished!!!!!!! The reason the Attributes API was kept
      private in 4.2 was due to some publicly visible implementation details.
      It was previously implemented by overloading `columns` and
      `columns_hash`, to make them return column objects which were modified
      with the attribute information.
      
      This meant that those methods LIED! We didn't change the database
      schema. We changed the attribute information on the class. That is
      wrong! It should be the other way around, where schema loading just
      calls the attributes API for you. And now it does!
      
      Yes, this means that there is nothing that happens in automatic schema
      loading that you couldn't manually do yourself. (There's still some
      funky cases where we hit the connection adapter that I need to handle,
      before we can turn off automatic schema detection entirely.)
      
      There were a few weird test failures caused by this that had to be
      fixed. The main source came from the fact that the attribute methods are
      now defined in terms of `attribute_names`, which has a clause like
      `return [] unless table_exists?`. I don't *think* this is an issue,
      since the only place this caused failures were in a fake adapter which
      didn't override `table_exists?`.
      
      Additionally, there were a few cases where tests were failing because a
      migration was run, but the model was not reloaded. I'm not sure why
      these started failing from this change, I might need to clear an
      additional cache in `reload_schema_from_cache`. Again, since this is not
      normal usage, and it's expected that `reset_column_information` will be
      called after the table is modified, I don't think it's a problem.
      
      Still, test failures that were unrelated to the change are worrying, and
      I need to dig into them further.
      
      Finally, I spent a lot of time debugging issues with the mutex used in
      `define_attribute_methods`. I think we can just remove that method
      entirely, and define the attribute methods *manually* in the call to
      `define_attribute`, which would simplify the code *tremendously*.
      
      Ok. now to make this damn thing public, and work on moving it up to
      Active Model.
      70ac0729
  5. 29 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 28 1月, 2015 2 次提交
    • S
      Remove Relation#bind_params · b06f64c3
      Sean Griffin 提交于
      `bound_attributes` is now used universally across the board, removing
      the need for the conversion layer. These changes are mostly mechanical,
      with the exception of the log subscriber. Additional, we had to
      implement `hash` on the attribute objects, so they could be used as a
      key for query caching.
      b06f64c3
    • S
      Unify access to bind values on Relation · 16ce2eec
      Sean Griffin 提交于
      The bind values can come from four places. `having`, `where`, `joins`,
      and `from` when selecting from a subquery that contains binds. These
      need to be kept in a specific order, since the clauses will always
      appear in that order. Up until recently, they were not.
      
      Additionally, `joins` actually did keep its bind values in a separate
      location (presumably because it's the only case that people noticed was
      broken). However, this meant that anything accessing just `bind_values`
      was broken (which most places were). This is no longer possible, there
      is only a single way to access the bind values, and it includes joins in
      the proper location. The setter was removed yesterday, so breaking `+=`
      cases is not possible.
      
      I'm still not happy that `joins` is putting it's bind values on the
      Arel AST, and I'm planning on refactoring it further, but this removes a
      ton of bug cases.
      16ce2eec
  7. 27 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      Change `having_values` to use the `WhereClause` class · 39f2c3b3
      Sean Griffin 提交于
      This fixed an issue where `having` can only be called after the last
      call to `where`, because it messes with the same `bind_values` array.
      With this change, the two can be called as many times as needed, in any
      order, and the final query will be correct. However, once something
      assigns `bind_values`, that stops. This is because we have to move all
      of the bind values from the having clause over to the where clause since
      we can't differentiate the two, and assignment was likely in the form
      of:
      
      `relation.bind_values += other.bind_values`
      
      This will go away once we remove all places that are assigning
      `bind_values`, which is next on the list.
      
      While this fixes a bug that was present in at least 4.2 (more likely
      present going back as far as 3.0, becoming more likely in 4.1 and later
      as we switched to prepared statements in more cases), I don't think this
      can be easily backported. The internal changes to `Relation` are
      non-trivial, anything that involves modifying the `bind_values` array
      would need to change, and I'm not confident that we have sufficient test
      coverage of all of those locations (when `having` was called with a hash
      that could generate bind values).
      
      [Sean Griffin & anthonynavarre]
      39f2c3b3
  8. 02 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 11 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  10. 02 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 31 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      Don't require calculations to be aliased to a column · 53ec0bc0
      Sean Griffin 提交于
      Arel has changed so that `.sum` no longer aliases `SUM(the_column)` to
      `sum_id`. This means the type returned by the adapter will be at the key
      `"SUM(the_column)"`. Longer term, we should eventually be able to retain
      type information from the AR::Base subclasses used in joined queries
      53ec0bc0
  12. 20 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 03 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  14. 22 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 18 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  16. 17 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 12 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  18. 10 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      Rename `type_cast` to `type_cast_from_database` · d24e6407
      Sean Griffin 提交于
      In some cases there is a difference between the two, we should always
      be doing one or the other. For convenience, `type_cast` is still a
      private method on type, so new types that do not need different behavior
      don't need to implement two methods, but it has been moved to private so
      it cannot be used accidentally.
      d24e6407
  19. 04 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • E
      reuse available belongs_to? method · 3ef8d536
      eileencodes 提交于
      Reflection has a `belongs_to?` method. Instead of checking for
      `macro == :belongs_to` throughout the source reuse existing
      method.
      
      I also bumped `foreign_key_present?` method onto on line because
      the `belongs_to?` makes it shorter than other longer lines in
      the same class.
      3ef8d536
  20. 03 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 25 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  22. 13 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 03 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  24. 15 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • L
      Make sure the column_name is different from 'all'. · a9416a40
      Lauro Caetano 提交于
      968c581e have fixed the EagerLoadTest, but
      not in the correct way.
      
      The problem was when `empty?` or `size` was called on relation. It was
      triggering `count(:all)`, which was passing `:all` as the column name to `count`
      on Calculations.
      
      On the other hand, the method `calculate` on Calculations was calling
      `construct_relation_for_association_calculations` instead of `perform_calculation`,
      because `has_include?` was returning `true` since `column_name` was present.
      
      To prevent calling the wrong method to perform the calculation, we have to check
      if the `column_name` is present and if it is different from `:all` (which is now used
      to correctly do `count` with `select`).
      
      More information here: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/968c581ea34b5236af14805e6a77913b1cb36238#commitcomment-6006135
      a9416a40
  25. 07 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  26. 14 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 11 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  28. 10 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  29. 14 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  30. 13 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  31. 31 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  32. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  33. 03 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  34. 02 7月, 2013 5 次提交