1. 18 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 16 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 12 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 11 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 09 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 07 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 21 2月, 2010 2 次提交
    • J
      Require persisted? in ActiveModel::Lint and remove new_record? and destroyed?... · 250c8092
      José Valim 提交于
      Require persisted? in ActiveModel::Lint and remove new_record? and destroyed? methods. ActionPack does not care if the resource is new or if it was destroyed, it cares only if it's persisted somewhere or not.
      250c8092
    • S
      AMo #key is now #to_key and CI is probably happy · f81c6bc0
      snusnu 提交于
      Obviously #key is a too common name to be included
      in the AMo interface, #to_key fits better and also
      relates nicely to #to_param. Thx wycats, koz and
      josevalim for the suggestion.
      
      AR's #to_key implementation now takes customized
      primary keys into account and there's a testcase
      for that too.
      
      The #to_param AMo lint makes no assumptions on how
      the method behaves in the presence of composite
      primary keys. It leaves the decision wether to
      provide a default, or to raise and thus signal to
      the user that implementing this method will need
      his special attention, up to the implementers. All
      AMo cares about is that #to_param is implemented
      and returns nil in case of a new_record?.
      
      The default CompliantObject used in lint_test
      provides a naive default implementation that just
      joins all key attributes with '-'.
      
      The #to_key default implementation in lint_test's
      CompliantObject now returns [id] instead of [1].
      This was previously causing the (wrong) tests I
      added for AR's #to_key implementation to pass. The
      #to_key tests added with this patch should be
      better.
      
      The CI failure was caused by my lack of knowledge
      about the test:isolated task. The tests for the
      record_identifier code in action_controller are
      using fake non AR models and I forgot to stub the
      #to_key method over there. This issue didn't come
      up when running the test task, only test:isolated
      revealed it. This patch fixes that.
      
      All tests pass isolated or not, well, apart from
      one previously unpended test in action_controller
      that is unrelated to my patch.
      f81c6bc0
  8. 20 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      Adds #key and #to_param to the AMo interface · 9acd6867
      snusnu 提交于
      This commit introduces two new methods that every
      AMo compliant object must implement. Below are the
      default implementations along with the implied
      interface contract.
      
        # Returns an Enumerable of all (primary) key
        # attributes or nil if new_record? is true
        def key
          new_record? ? nil : [1]
        end
      
        # Returns a string representing the object's key
        # suitable for use in URLs, or nil if new_record?
        # is true
        def to_param
          key ? key.first.to_s : nil
        end
      
      1) The #key method
      
      Previously rails' record_identifier code, which is
      used in the #dom_id helper, relied on calling #id
      on the record to provide a reasonable DOM id. Now
      with rails3 being all ORM agnostic, it's not safe
      anymore to assume that every record ever will have
      an #id as its primary key attribute.
      
      Having a #key method available on every AMo object
      means that #dom_id can be implemented using
      
        record.to_model.key # instead of
        record.id
      
      Using this we're able to take composite primary
      keys into account (e.g. available in datamapper)
      by implementing #dom_id using a newly added
      
        record_key_for_dom_id(record)
      
      method. The user can overwrite this method to
      provide customized versions of the object's key
      used in #dom_id.
      
      Also, dealing with more complex keys that can
      contain arbitrary strings, means that we need to
      make sure that we only provide DOM ids that are
      valid according to the spec. For this reason, this
      patch sends the key provided through a newly added
      
        sanitize_dom_id(candidate_id)
      
      method, that makes sure we only produce valid HTML
      
      The reason to not just add #dom_id to the AMo
      interface was that it feels like providing a DOM
      id should not be a model concern. Adding #dom_id
      to the AMo interface would force these concern on
      the model, while it's better left to be implemented
      in a helper.
      
      Now one could say the same is true for #to_param,
      and actually I think that it doesn't really fit
      into the model either, but it's used in AR and it's
      a main part of integrating into the rails router.
      
      This is different from #dom_id which is only used
      in view helpers and can be implemented on top of a
      semantically more meaningful method like #key.
      
      2) The #to_param method
      
      Since the rails router relies on #to_param to be
      present, AR::Base implements it and returns the
      id by default, allowing the user to overwrite the
      method if desired.
      
      Now with different ORMs integrating into rails,
      every ORM railtie needs to implement it's own
      #to_param implementation while already providing
      code to be AMo compliant. Since the whole point of
      AMo compliance seems to be to integrate any ORM
      seamlessly into rails, it seems fair that all we
      really need to do as another ORM, is to be AMo
      compliant. By including #to_param into the official
      interface, we can make sure that this code can be
      centralized in the various AMo compliance layers,
      and not be added separately by every ORM railtie.
      
      3) All specs pass
      9acd6867
  9. 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 14 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 03 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 02 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 20 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 11 10月, 2009 2 次提交
  15. 04 10月, 2009 4 次提交
  16. 14 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  17. 07 9月, 2009 4 次提交
  18. 04 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  19. 02 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  20. 26 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 16 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      Got tests to pass with some more changes. · 1310231c
      Yehuda Katz 提交于
        * request.formats is much simpler now
          * For XHRs or Accept headers with a single item, we use the Accept header
          * For other requests, we use params[:format] or fallback to HTML
          * This is primarily to work around the fact that browsers provide completely
            broken Accept headers, so we have to whitelist the few cases we can
            specifically isolate and treat other requests as coming from the browser
          * For APIs, we can support single-item Accept headers, which disambiguates
            from the browsers
        * Requests to an action that only has an XML template from the browser will
          no longer find the template. This worked previously because most browsers
          provide a catch-all */*, but this was mostly accidental behavior. If you
          want to serve XML, either use the :xml format in links, or explicitly
          specify the XML template: render "template.xml".
      1310231c
  22. 13 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 07 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  24. 21 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 19 7月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      Define ActiveModel API Compliance · 5ffaaa71
      Yehuda Katz 提交于
        - Define to_model on AR
        - Define to_model on ActiveModel::APICompliant
        - Update test fixtures to be API Compliant
        - Start using to_model in AP
      5ffaaa71
  26. 24 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 18 6月, 2009 3 次提交
  28. 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交