- 24 11月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 17 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 16 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
[#5978 state:committed]
-
- 09 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Chelimsky 提交于
- persisted? is the API defined in ActiveModel - makes it easier for extension libraries to conform to ActiveModel APIs without concern for whether the extended object is specifically ActiveRecord [#5927 state:committed] Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pratik Naik 提交于
-
- 21 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Jan 提交于
-
- 16 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 28 9月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 23 9月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 21 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emilio Tagua 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 08 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Patterson 提交于
-
- 05 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
order that is declared first has highest priority in all cases. Here are some examples. Car.order('name desc').find(:first, :order => 'id').name Car.named_scope_with_order.named_scope_with_another_order Car.order('id DESC').scoping do Car.find(:first, :order => 'id asc') end No special treatment to with_scope or scoping. Also note that if default_scope declares an order then the order declared in default_scope has the highest priority unless with_exclusive_scope is used. Signed-off-by: NSantiago Pastorino <santiago@wyeworks.com>
-
- 02 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew White 提交于
Signed-off-by: NXavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Kemper 提交于
-
- 15 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Santiago Pastorino 提交于
-
- 03 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
to relevant files. Number of assertions before refactoring: 2391 tests, 7579 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors Number of assertions after refactoring: 2391 tests, 7579 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Brian Lopez 提交于
-
- 02 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Lopez 提交于
-
- 19 7月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Łukasz Strzałkowski 提交于
-
由 Łukasz Strzałkowski 提交于
-
- 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
Before refactoring test result from AR: 2291 tests, 7180 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors After the refactoring test result from AR: 2291 tests, 7180 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Pratik Naik 提交于
This reverts commit 3c300b31.
-
由 wycats 提交于
-
- 14 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pratik Naik 提交于
-
- 09 7月, 2010 6 次提交
-
-
由 David Trasbo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
- it will only save the attribute it has been asked to save and not all dirty attributes - it does not invoke callbacks - it does change updated_at/on Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Mislav Marohnić 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net>
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Josh Kalderimis 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Eric Chapweske 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 29 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Trasbo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 23 6月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Neeraj Singh 提交于
[#4945 state:resolved] Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul Gillard 提交于
Cloning an active record object should be shallow in that it should copy attributes but not associations. This was no longer true as a result of #3164. Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 rohit 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosé Valim <jose.valim@gmail.com>
-