Skip to content
体验新版
项目
组织
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
打开侧边栏
张重言
rails
提交
3366a3ad
R
rails
项目概览
张重言
/
rails
通知
1
Star
0
Fork
0
代码
文件
提交
分支
Tags
贡献者
分支图
Diff
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
Wiki
0
Wiki
分析
仓库
DevOps
项目成员
Pages
R
rails
项目概览
项目概览
详情
发布
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分支图
比较
Issue
0
Issue
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
Pages
分析
分析
仓库分析
DevOps
Wiki
0
Wiki
成员
成员
收起侧边栏
关闭侧边栏
动态
分支图
创建新Issue
提交
Issue看板
体验新版 GitCode,发现更多精彩内容 >>
未验证
提交
3366a3ad
编写于
2月 03, 2016
作者:
H
Hongli Lai (Phusion)
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
电子邮件补丁
差异文件
Document the fact that Action Cable does not require a multi-threaded app server
[ci skip]
上级
8a84f1c0
变更
1
隐藏空白更改
内联
并排
Showing
1 changed file
with
11 addition
and
2 deletion
+11
-2
actioncable/README.md
actioncable/README.md
+11
-2
未找到文件。
actioncable/README.md
浏览文件 @
3366a3ad
...
...
@@ -448,8 +448,17 @@ as long as you haven’t committed any thread-safety sins.
But this also means that Action Cable needs to run in its own server process.
So you'll have one set of server processes for your normal web work, and another
set of server processes for the Action Cable. The former can be single-threaded,
like Unicorn, but the latter must be multi-threaded, like Puma.
set of server processes for the Action Cable.
The Action Cable server does _not_ need to be a multi-threaded application server.
This is because Action Cable uses the
[
Rack socket hijacking API
](
http://old.blog.phusion.nl/2013/01/23/the-new-rack-socket-hijacking-api/
)
to take over control of connections from the application server. Action Cable
then manages connections internally, in a multithreaded manner, regardless of
whether the application server is multi-threaded or not. So Action Cable works
with all the popular application servers -- Unicorn, Puma and Passenger.
Action Cable does not work with WEBrick, because WEBrick does not support the
Rack socket hijacking API.
## License
...
...
编辑
预览
Markdown
is supported
0%
请重试
或
添加新附件
.
添加附件
取消
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
取消
想要评论请
注册
或
登录